Blind Myself: Simple Steps for Editors and Software Providers to Take Against Affiliation Bias

  • János TóthEmail author
Letter to the Editor


This letter contains suggestions for editors and software providers to help avoid affiliation bias in the initial and concluding stages of the peer review process. Submission management systems have a responsibility to ensure protection against affiliation bias. This can be achieved by automatically withholding the author’s identity and affiliation information from all editors, including the Editor-in-Chief, until a decision about publication has been made. Journals relying on email-based submissions are in a more difficult situation. Not having external support in confirming the submitting author’s identity, this dilemma can be resolved through the implementation of strict instructions and guidelines concerning manuscript submission and handling. In this case the “human factor” cannot be fully eliminated, while automated processes can only be changed intentionally and with a certain delay. Therefore, with the suggested steps, submission management systems could become a strong guard against unconscious bias while also making conscious bias more difficult to impact the peer review process.


Affiliation bias Journal policies Submission software Triple blind peer review 



  1. Harris, M., Marti, J., Bhatti, Y., Watt, H., Macinko, J., & Darzi, A. (2017). Explicit bias towards high-income country research: A randomized, blinded, crossover experiment in English clinicians. Health Affairs. Scholar
  2. Toth, J. (2018). U.S. journals can afford to remain regional, but we can not. Author distribution-based internationality of Eastern European communication journals. KOME - An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 6(2), 1–15. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication and MediaKodolányi János UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations