Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism
Can robots have significant moral status? This is an emerging topic of debate among roboticists and ethicists. This paper makes three contributions to this debate. First, it presents a theory—‘ethical behaviourism’—which holds that robots can have significant moral status if they are roughly performatively equivalent to other entities that have significant moral status. This theory is then defended from seven objections. Second, taking this theoretical position onboard, it is argued that the performative threshold that robots need to cross in order to be afforded significant moral status may not be that high and that they may soon cross it (if they haven’t done so already). Finally, the implications of this for our procreative duties to robots are considered, and it is argued that we may need to take seriously a duty of ‘procreative beneficence’ towards robots.
KeywordsRobots Moral status Moral standing Ethical behaviourism Procreative beneficence
The author would like to thank Matthijs Maas, Sven Nyholm and four anonymous reviewers and for helpful comments on earlier drafts of this article. He would also like to thank audiences at NUI Galway and Manchester University for enduring earlier presentations of its core argument.
- Bennet, M. R., Dennett, D., Hacker, P. M. S., & Searle, J. (2007). Neuroscience and philosophy: Brain, mind, and language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Graham, G. (2015). Behaviorism. Stanford Encyclopedia of the Philosophy, available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/behaviorism/. Accessed 10 July 2018.
- Gruen, L. (2017). The moral status of animals. In Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-animal/.
- Gunkel, D. (2011). The machine question. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Hauskeller, M. (2017). Automatic sweethearts for transhumanists. In J. Danaher & N. McArthur (Eds.), Robot sex: Social and ethical implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jaworska, A., & Tannenbaum, J. (2018). The grounds of moral status. In Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/grounds-moral-status/.
- Kaczor, C. (2011). The ethics of abortion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Leong, B., & Selinger, E. (2019). Robot eyes wide shut: Understanding dishonest anthropomorphism. In 2019 Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery’s Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 299–308.Google Scholar
- Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University.Google Scholar
- Lockhart, T. (2000). Moral uncertainty and its consequences. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
- Nyholm, S., & Frank, L. E. (2017). From sex robots to love robots: Is mutual love with a robot possible? In J. Danaher & N. McArthur (Eds.), Robot sex: Social and ethical implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Overall, C. (2011). Why have children? The ethical debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Raoult, A., & Yampolskiy, R. (2018). Reviewing tests for machine consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, forthcoming—available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325498266_Reviewing_Tests_for_Machine_Consciousness. Accessed 28 March 2019.
- Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Singer, P. (1981). The expanding circle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Sparrow, R. (2012). Can machines be people? Reflections on the turing triage test. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics (pp. 301–316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Stone, Z. (2017). Everything you need to know about Sophia, The World’s First Robot Citizen. Forbes 7th November 2017, available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/zarastone/2017/11/07/everything-you-need-to-know-about-sophia-the-worlds-first-robot-citizen/#4e76f02b46fa. Accessed 10 July 2018.
- Sumner, L. (1987). The moral foundations of rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Vincent, J. (2017). Pretending to give robots citizenship helps no one. The Verge 30th October 2017, available at https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/30/16552006/robot-rights-citizenship-saudi-arabia-sophia. Accessed 10 July 2018.