From Treasure to Trash: The Lingering Value of Technological Artifacts

  • Benjamin HaleEmail author
  • Lucy McAllister
Original Research/Scholarship


Electronic waste (e-waste) is the fastest growing form of waste worldwide, associated with a range of environmental, health, and justice problems. Unfortunately, disposal and recycling are hindered by a tendency of consumers to resist recycling their e-waste. This backlog of un-discarded e-waste poses significant challenges for the future. This paper addresses the reasons why many people might continue to value their technological artifacts and therefore to hoard them, suggesting that many of these common explanations are deficient in some way. It argues instead for a derivative kind of value, here labelled “system value”. Addressing the problem of hoarding by invoking the idea of system value, the authors conjecture, could offer some clarity about how to move forward with more successful e-waste management programs.


E-waste System value Lifeworld Recycling 



  1. Arthur, C. (2012). Apple rejoins EPEAT environmental ratings system. Guardian. Accessed 26 May 2017.
  2. Boone, T., & Ganeshan, R. (2012). A primer on e-waste. In Sustainable supply chains (pp. 107-127). Springer, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  3. Boudier, F., & Bensebaa, F. (2011). Hazardous waste management and corporate social responsibility: Illegal trade of electrical and electronic waste. Business and Society Review, 116(1), 29–53.Google Scholar
  4. Bouvier, R., & Wagner, T. (2011). The influence of collection facility attributes on household collection rates of electronic waste: The case of televisions and computer monitors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(11), 1051–1059.Google Scholar
  5. Darby, L., & Obara, L. (2005). Household recycling behavior and attitudes towards the disposal of small electrical and electronic equipment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 44(1), 17–35.Google Scholar
  6. Duan, H., Miller, T. R., Gregory, J., Kirchain, R., & Linnell, J. (2013). Quantitative characterization of domestic and transboundary flows of used electronics. MIT Materials Systems Laboratory.Google Scholar
  7. EcoLog. (2013). E-waste recycling slow to enter Canadian tech culture, poll says. Accessed 23 February 2017.Google Scholar
  8. Fu, J., Zhou, Q., Liu, J., Liu, W., Wang, T., Zhang, Q., et al. (2008). High levels of heavy metals in rice (Oryza sativa L.) from a typical E-waste recycling area in southeast China and its potential risk to human health. Chemosphere, 71(7), 1269–1275.Google Scholar
  9. Garfinkel, S. L., & Shelat, A. (2003). Remembrance of data passed: A study of disk sanitization practices. IEEE Security and Privacy, 99(1), 17–27.Google Scholar
  10. Gettleman, J. (2013). The price of precious. National Geographic. Accessed 4 January 2016.
  11. Gibbs, C., McGarrell, E. F., Axelrod, M., & Rivers, L. (2011). Conservation criminology and the global trade in electronic waste: Applying a multi-disciplinary research framework. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 35(4), 269–291.Google Scholar
  12. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system, Vol. 2 (T. McCarthy, Trans. Vol. 2). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kahhat, R., Kim, J., Xu, M., Allenby, B., Williams, E., & Zhang, P. (2008). Exploring e-waste management systems in the United States. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(7), 955–964.Google Scholar
  15. Kang, H. Y., & Schoenung, J. M. (2005). Electronic waste recycling: A review of US infrastructure and technology options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 45(4), 368–400.Google Scholar
  16. Knussen, C., & Yule, F. (2008). “I’m not in the habit of recycling” the role of habitual behavior in the disposal of household waste. Environment and Behavior, 40(5), 683–702.Google Scholar
  17. Knussen, C., Yule, F., MacKenzie, J., & Wells, M. (2004). An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: The roles of past behavior, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 237–246.Google Scholar
  18. Lepawsky, J. (2012). Legal geographies of e-waste legislation in Canada and the US: Jurisdiction, responsibility and the taboo of production. Geoforum, 43(6), 1194–1206.Google Scholar
  19. Lepawsky, J., & Mather, C. (2011). From beginnings and endings to boundaries and edges: rethinking circulation and exchange through electronic waste. Area, 43(3), 242–249.Google Scholar
  20. Leung, A. O. W., Duzgoren-Aydin, N. S., Cheung, K. C., & Wong, M. H. (2008). Heavy metals concentrations of surface dust from e-waste recycling and its human health implications in Southeast China. Environmental Science and Technology, 42(7), 2674–2680.Google Scholar
  21. Luther, L. (2008). Managing electronic waste: An analysis of state e-waste legislation. Congressional Research Service, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  22. Luther, L. (2010). Managing electronic waste: Issues with exporting e-waste. Congressional Research Service, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  23. McAllister, L. (2012). Field notes. New Delhi, India. University of Colorado Boulder IRB Protocol #: 12-0645.Google Scholar
  24. McAllister, L., Magee, A., & Hale, B. (2014). Women, e-waste, and technical solutions to climate change. Health and Human Rights, 16(1), 166–178.Google Scholar
  25. Myyry, L., & Helkama, K. (2002). The role of value priorities and professional ethics training in moral sensitivity. Journal of Moral Education, 31(1), 35–50.Google Scholar
  26. Ogunseitan, O. A., Schoenung, J. M., Saphores, J. D. M., & Shapiro, A. A. (2009). The electronics revolution: From e-wonderland to e-wasteland. Science, 326(5953), 670–671.Google Scholar
  27. Parsons, T. (1991). The social system. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  28. Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviors: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79–98.Google Scholar
  29. Pickren, G. (2014). Political ecologies of electronic waste: uncertainty and legitimacy in the governance of e-waste geographies. Environment and Planning A, 46(1), 26–45.Google Scholar
  30. Prather, M. J., & Hsu, J. (2008). NF3, the greenhouse gas missing from Kyoto. Geophysical Research Letters, 35(12), L20821.Google Scholar
  31. Riley, M. (2008). From salvage to recycling–new agendas or same old rubbish? Area, 40(1), 79–89.Google Scholar
  32. Ritter, B. A. (2006). Can business ethics be trained? A study of the ethical decision-making process in business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(2), 153–164.Google Scholar
  33. Robinson, B. H. (2009). E-waste: An assessment of global production and environmental impacts. Science of the Total Environment, 408(2), 183–191.Google Scholar
  34. Saphores, J. D. M., Nixon, H., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Shapiro, A. A. (2009). How much e-waste is there in US basements and attics? Results from a national survey. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(11), 3322–3331.Google Scholar
  35. Saphores, J. D. M., Ogunseitan, O. A., & Shapiro, A. A. (2012). Willingness to engage in a pro-environmental behavior: An analysis of e-waste recycling based on a national survey of US households. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 60, 49–63.Google Scholar
  36. Savitz, E. (2012). Carriers to take EPS Hit with arrival of Apple iPhone 5. Accessed 6 August 2014.Google Scholar
  37. Sepúlveda, A., Schluep, M., Renaud, F. G., Streicher, M., Kuehr, R., Hagelüken, C., et al. (2010). A review of the environmental fate and effects of hazardous substances released from electrical and electronic equipments during recycling: Examples from China and India. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(1), 28–41.Google Scholar
  38. Sthiannopkao, S. (2012). Managing e-waste in developed and developing countries. In Global risk-based management of chemical additives II, Springer, pp. 263–278. Accessed 27 October 2013.
  39. Strickland, E. (2011). Cracking down on conflict minerals. Accessed 27 October 2013.Google Scholar
  40. Sunstein, C., & Thaler, R. (2008). Nudge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Thøgersen, J. (1994). A model of recycling behavior, with evidence from Danish source separation programmes. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11(2), 145–163.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Studies Program and Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.History and Society DivisionBabson CollegeBabson ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations