Imaginative Value Sensitive Design: Using Moral Imagination Theory to Inform Responsible Technology Design
Safe-by-design (SBD) frameworks for the development of emerging technologies have become an ever more popular means by which scholars argue that transformative emerging technologies can safely incorporate human values. One such popular SBD methodology is called value sensitive design (VSD). A central tenet of this design methodology is to investigate stakeholder values and design those values into technologies during early stage research and development. To accomplish this, the VSD framework mandates that designers consult the philosophical and ethical literature to best determine how to weigh moral trade-offs. However, the VSD framework also concedes the universalism of moral values, particularly the values of freedom, autonomy, equality trust and privacy justice. This paper argues that the VSD methodology, particularly applied to nano-bio-info-cogno technologies, has an insufficient grounding for the determination of moral values. As such, an exploration of the value-investigations of VSD are deconstructed to illustrate both its strengths and weaknesses. This paper also provides possible modalities for the strengthening of the VSD methodology, particularly through the application of moral imagination and how moral imagination exceeds the boundaries of moral intuitions in the development of novel technologies.
KeywordsValue sensitive design Design psychology Moral imagination Applied ethics
This paper has been adapted from a dissertation accepted and published by the University of Edinburgh. I would like to thank the two anonymous reviews that provided both encouraging and constructive comments on this manuscript. Any remaining errors are the author’s alone. The view expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies.
- Borges, M. (2004). What can Kant teach us about emotions? The Journal of Philosophy, 101(3), 140–158.Google Scholar
- Borning, A., & Muller, M. (2012). Next steps for value sensitive design. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI’12 (p. 1125). https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208560.
- Correljé, A., Cuppen, E., Dignum, M., Pesch, U., & Taebi, B. (2015). Responsible innovation in energy projects: Values in the design of technologies, Institutions and Stakeholder Interactions 1 (Draft Version for Forthcoming Book). In B.-J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, & J. van den Hoven (Eds.), Responsible innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 183–200). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Davis, J., & Nathan, L. P. (2015). Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design: Sources, theory, values and application domains. In J. van den Hoven, P. E. Vermaas & I. van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design: Sources, theory, values and application domains (pp. 12–40). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6970-0.
- De Tiège, A., Van de Peer, Y., Braeckman, J., & Tanghe, K. B. (2018). The sociobiology of genes: The gene’s eye view as a unifying behavioural-ecological framework for biological evolution. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 40(1), 6.Google Scholar
- Ervas, F., Gola, E., & Rossi, M. G. (2018). Argumentation as a bridge between metaphor and reasoning. In S. Oswald, T. Herman & J. Jacquin (Eds.), Argumentation and language—Linguistic, cognitive and discursive explorations (pp. 153–170). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Fesmire, S. (2003). John Dewey and moral imagination: Pragmatism in ethics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
- Flanagan, M., Howe, D. C., & Nissenbaum, H. (2008). Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. In J. van den Hoven & J. Weckert (Eds.), Information technology and moral philosophy (pp. 322–353). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Friedman, B. (1997). Human values and the design of computer technology. In B. Friedman (Ed.) CSLI Publications. https://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/site/1575860805.shtml#.
- Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2003a). Human values, ethics, and design. In J. A. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1177–1201). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
- Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2003b). Human values, ethics, and design. In The human-computer interaction handbook (pp. 1177–1201). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, NJ.Google Scholar
- Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., & Borinng, A. (2008). Value sensitive design and information systems. In K. E. Himma & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), The Handbook of information and computer ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., Borning, A., & Huldtgren, A. (2013). Value sensitive design and information systems. In N. Doorn, D. Schuurbiers, I. van de Poel, & M. E. Gorman (Eds.), Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the Laboratory (pp. 55–95). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_4.Google Scholar
- Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2017). Metaphor wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gogoll, J., & Müller, J. F. (2017). Autonomous cars: In favor of a mandatory ethics setting. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(3), 681–700.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, B. (2016). Mechanism and meaning. In J. Hyman (Ed.), Investigating psychology (pp. 62–80). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2007). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. The Innate Mind, 3, 367–391.Google Scholar
- Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Harman, G. (2016). Immaterialism: Objects and social theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Harman, G. (2018a). Object-oriented ontology: A new theory of everything. New York, NY: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
- Harman, G. (2018b). Object-oriented ontology. Pelican.Google Scholar
- Hughes, J. (2014). Compassionate AI and selfless robots: A buddhist approach. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), Robot ethics: The ethical and social implications of robotics (pp. 69–84). Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Huldtgren, A. (2014). Design for values in ICT. In J. van den Hoven, P. E. Vermaas, & I. van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design: Sources, theory, values and application domains (pp. 1–24). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6_35-1.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. (2013). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. (2014). Morality for humans: Ethical understanding from the perspective of cognitive science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Kahn, C. H. (1987). Plato’s theory of desire. The Review of Metaphysics, 41(1), 77–103.Google Scholar
- Kant, I. (2015). Critical neutralization of the antinomy of practical reason. In A. Reath & M. Gregor (Eds.), The critique of practical reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kemeny, M. E. (2009). Psychobiological responses to social threat: Evolution of a psychological model in psychoneuroimmunology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Krakowiak, K. M., & Tsay-Vogel, M. (2015). The dual role of morally ambiguous characters: Examining the effect of morality salience on narrative responses. Human Communication Research, 41(3), 390–411.Google Scholar
- Kramp, M. K. (2003). Exploring life and experience through narrative inquiry. In O. Lagerspetz, J. Antfolk, Y. Gustafsson, & C. Kronqvist (Eds.), Foundations for research (pp. 119–138). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Polity.Google Scholar
- Le Dantec, C. A., Poole, E. S., & Wyche, S. P. (2009). Values as lived experience: Evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI’09 (pp. 1141–1150). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518875.
- Meillassoux, Q. (2008). In R. Brassier (Ed.), After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
- Meillassoux, Q. (2009). In R. Brassier (Ed.), After finitude: An essay on the necessity of contingency. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/after-finitude-9781441173836.
- Mordini, E. (2007). The narrative dimension of nanotechnology. Nanotechnology Perceptions, 3, 15–24.Google Scholar
- Morton, T. (2016). Dark ecology: For a logic of future coexistence. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Morton, T. (2018). Being ecological. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). The fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in greek tragedy and philosophy (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Peterson, J. B. (1999). Maps of meaning: The architecture of belief. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Rolf, M., & Crook, N. (2016). What if: Robots create novel goals? Ethics based on social value systems. In CEUR workshop proceedings (pp. 20–25).Google Scholar
- Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sarbin, T. R. (2001). Embodiment and the narrative structure of emotional life. Narrative Inquiry, 11(1), 217–225.Google Scholar
- Segerstrale, U. (2016). The westermarck thesis as a thinking tool for sociobiology. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (Eds.), Evolution, human behaviour and morality (pp. 97–118). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Taub, S. (2012). Iconicity and metaphor. In Sign language—An international handbook (pp. 388–412). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Tilmouth, C. (2007). Passion’s triumph over reason: A history of the moral imagination from spenser to rochester. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Turner, M. (1994). Reading minds: The study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Turner, M. (2006). The artful mind: Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Turner, M. (2010). Conceptual integration. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0015.
- Turner, M., & Fauconnier, G. (2000). Metaphor, metonymy, and binding. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (Vol. 356). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Unger, R. M. (1976). Knowledge and politics. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- van den Hoven, J. (2013). Architecture and value-sensitive design. In C. Basta & S. Moroni (Eds.), Ethics, design and planning of the built environment (Vol. 224). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- van den Hoven, J., & Weckert, J. (Eds.). (2008). Information technology and moral philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2017). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Warnier, M., Dechesne, F., & Brazier, F. (2014). Design for the value of privacy. In J. van den Hoven, P. E. Vermaas, & I. van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design: Sources, theory, values and application domains (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6994-6_17-1.Google Scholar