Advertisement

An Empirical Study on Construction Process Corruption Susceptibility: A Vignette of International Expertise

  • Emmanuel Kingsford OwusuEmail author
  • Albert P. C. Chan
  • Ming Shan
  • Erika Pärn
Original Research
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Construction process stages are argued to be vulnerable to the prevalence of corrupt practices. However, the validity of this argument has not been empirically explored in the extant literature of construction management. Therefore, this study examines the stages of the construction process susceptibility to corruption and its most prominent forms of corrupt activities (within the respective stages). A total of forty-four project-related professionals were involved in an expert survey to assess such susceptibilities and the criticality of the identified corrupt activities at each stage. A comparative study of expert views from developing regions against experts from developed regions is conducted. Expert scoring results revealed that three stages are most susceptible, namely: project execution, pre-qualification and tender stages. Such results were confirmed by application of the Mann–Whitney U test statistics tool, showing wide disparities in seven out of eleven identical stages. This study is intended to incite polemic discussions and greater empirical, evidence-based research from scholars in both developed and developing countries. This study adds to the extant literature corruption-related works on the construction process through deeper understanding of the dynamic nature of corrupt practices involved in the stages of the construction process in developing countries. Practically, it intends to offer a veritable plethora of information on the critical stages of the construction process for industry practitioners, policymakers and anti-corruption bodies to careen their attention towards the fight against corruption.

Keywords

Construction management Corruption Susceptibility International survey 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper forms part of a research project entitled “Dynamic Evaluation of Corruption in Public Infrastructure Procurement: A Comparative Study of Emerging and Established Economies,” from which other deliverables have been produced with different objectives but sharing some levels of commonalities. We express our sincere gratitude to the Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong and to the Hong Kong Polytechnic University for funding this study. We are grateful to the industrial and academic experts involved in this study for the invaluable input, support and motivations (for both pilot study and the main survey). Lastly, the authors are extremely grateful to all the anonymous reviewers for providing constructive comments to enhance the quality of this paper.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that the authors of this paper have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ameyaw, E. E., & Chan, A. P. (2015). Evaluation and ranking of risk factors in public–private partnership water supply projects in developing countries using fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(12), 5102–5116.Google Scholar
  2. Ameyaw, E. E., Pärn, E., Chan, A. P., Owusu-Manu, D. G., Edwards, D. J., & Darko, A. (2017). Corrupt practices in the construction industry: Survey of Ghanaian experience. Journal of Management in Engineering, 1, 1.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000555.Google Scholar
  3. Blackburn, T. (2012). A project lifecycle and the construction processSeven stages from conception to demolition. https://pdhonline.com/courses/p155/p155content.pdf. Accessed August 25, 2017.
  4. Bowen, P. A., Edwards, P. J., & Cattell, K. (2012). Corruption in the South African construction industry: A thematic analysis of verbatim comments from survey participants. Construction Management and Economics, 30(10), 885–901.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, J. M., & Padilla, J. D. (2009). FIDIC and integrity: A status report. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 9(3), 125–128.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, J., & Loosemore, M. (2015). Behavioural factors influencing corrupt action in the Australian construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 22(4), 372–389.Google Scholar
  7. Buswell, R. A., Soar, R. C., Gibb, A. G., & Thorpe, A. (2007). Freeform construction: Mega-scale rapid manufacturing for construction. Automation in construction, 16(2), 224–231.Google Scholar
  8. Chan, A. P. C., Darko, A., Olanipekun, A. O., & Ameyaw, E. E. (2017). Critical barriers to green buildingtechnologies adoption in developing countries: The case of Ghana. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1067–1079.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, A. P., & Owusu, E. K. (2017). Corruption forms in the construction industry: Literature review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1, 1.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001353.Google Scholar
  10. Chan, E. H., Qian, Q. K., & Lam, P. T. (2009). The market for green building in developed Asian cities—The perspectives of building designers. Energy Policy, 37(8), 3061–3070.Google Scholar
  11. Chattered Institute of Building CIOB. (2013). A report exploring corruption in the UK construction industry. The Chartered Institute of Building. https://www.ciob.org/sites/default/files/CIOB%20research%20-%20Corruption%20in%20the%20UK%20Construction%20Industry%20September%202013.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2017.
  12. Chudley, R., & Greeno, R. (2013). Building construction handbook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Darko, A., & Chan, A. P. C. (2017). Strategies to promote green building technologies adoption in developing countries: The case of Ghana. Building and Environment, 130, 74–84.Google Scholar
  14. Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., & Owusu, E. K. (2018). What are the green technologies for sustainable housing development? An empirical study in Ghana. Business Strategy & Development, 1(2), 140–153.Google Scholar
  15. De Jong, M., Henry, W. P., & Stansbury, N. (2009). Eliminating corruption in our engineering/construction industry. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 9(3), 105–111.Google Scholar
  16. Fellows, R. F., & Liu, A. M. (2015). Research methods for construction. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Florida R. (2010). What makes countries corrupt. The Atlantic Business. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/11/what-makes-countries-corrupt/66362/. Accessed September 11, 2018.
  18. Harmon, K. M. (2003). Resolution of construction disputes: A review of current methodologies. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 3(4), 187–201.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, F., & McCaffer, R. (2013). Modern construction management. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Hendrickson, C., & Au, T. (2008). Project management for construction: Fundamental concepts for owners, engineers, architects, and builders. http://pmbook.ce.cmu.edu/03_The_Design_And_Construction_Process.html. Accessed December 20, 2017.
  21. Hoxley, M. (2008). Questionnaire design and factor analysis. In A. Knight & L. Ruddock (Eds.), Advanced research methods in the built environment (pp. 122–134). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Hwang, B. G., Shan, M., Xie, S., & Chi, S. (2017). Investigating residents’ perceptions of green retrofit program in mature residential estates: The case of Singapore. Habitat International, 63, 103–112.Google Scholar
  23. Hwang, B. G., Zhao, X., See, Y. L., & Zhong, Y. (2015). Addressing risks in green retrofit projects: The case of Singapore. Project Management Journal, 46(4), 76–89.Google Scholar
  24. Kenny, C. (2009). Transport construction, corruption and developing countries. Transport Reviews, 29(1), 21–41.Google Scholar
  25. Kim, T. K. (2015). T test as a parametric statistic. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 68(6), 540–546.Google Scholar
  26. Kottasova, I. (2014). World’s most corrupt industries. CNNMoney. https://money.cnn.com/2014/12/02/news/bribery-foreign-corruption/index.html. Accessed August 24, 2017.
  27. Krishnan, C. (2009). Combating corruption in the construction and engineering sector: The role of transparency international. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 9(3), 112–114.Google Scholar
  28. Krishnan, C. (2010). Tackling corruption in the construction. https://www.transparency.org.uk/wp-content/plugins/download-attachments/includes/download.php?id=1032. Accessed November 15, 2017.
  29. Lam, P. T., Chan, E. H., Ann, T. W., Cam, W. C., & Jack, S. Y. (2015). Applicability of clean development mechanism to the Hong Kong building sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 271–283.Google Scholar
  30. Le, Y., Shan, M., Chan, A. P., & Hu, Y. (2014a). Investigating the causal relationships between causes of and vulnerabilities to corruption in the Chinese public construction sector. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140(9), 05014007.Google Scholar
  31. Le, Y., Shan, M., Chan, A., & Hu, Y. (2014b). Overview of corruption research in construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(4), 02514001.Google Scholar
  32. Levy, S. M. (2010). Construction process planning and management: An owner’s guide to successful projects. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  33. Li, Y. Y., Chen, P. H., Chew, D. A. S., Teo, C. C., & Ding, R. G. (2011). Critical project management factors of AEC firms for delivering green building projects in Singapore. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(12), 1153–1163.Google Scholar
  34. Ling, F. Y. Y., Ong, S. Y., Ke, Y., Wang, S., & Zou, P. (2014). Drivers and barriers to adopting relational contracting practices in public projects: Comparative study of Beijing and Sydney. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 275–285.Google Scholar
  35. Menkel-Meadow, C. (1996). When dispute resolution begets disputes of its own: conflicts among dispute professionals. UCLA Law Review, 44, 1871.Google Scholar
  36. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (pp. 86–113, 190–255). New York City: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  37. Osei-Kyei, R., Chan, A. P., Dansoh, A., Ofori-Kuragu, J. K., & Owusu, E. K. (2018). Motivations for adopting unsolicited proposals for public–private partnership project implementation: A survey of international experts. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 23(2), 221–238.Google Scholar
  38. Ott, R. L., & Longnecker, M. T. (2015). An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Scarborough: Nelson Education.Google Scholar
  39. Owusu, E. K., & Chan, A. P. (2018). Barriers affecting effective application of anticorruption measures in infrastructure projects: Disparities between developed and developing countries. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(1), 04018056.Google Scholar
  40. Owusu, E. K., Chan, A. P., DeGraft, O.-M., Ameyaw, E. E., & Robert, O.-K. (2018). Contemporary review of anti-corruption measures in construction project management. Project Management Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972818808983.Google Scholar
  41. Owusu, E. K., Chan, A. P. C., & Shan, M. (2017). Causal factors of corruption in construction project management: An overview. Science and Engineering Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0002-4.Google Scholar
  42. PII—Pacific Invasive Initiative. (2011). The project process stages. http://pacificinvasivesinitiative.org/rk/project/1_Project_Selection.html. Accessed December 20, 2017.
  43. Santos, J. R. A. (1999). Cronbach’s alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of Extension, 37(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
  44. Seifert, B. M. (2005). International construction dispute adjudication under international federation of consulting engineers conditions of contract and the dispute adjudication board. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131(2), 149–157.Google Scholar
  45. Shakantu, W. M. W. (2006). Corruption in the construction industry: Forms, susceptibility and possible solutions. In CIDB 1st postgraduate conference 2003 (pp. 274–283). South Africa: Port Elizabeth.Google Scholar
  46. Shan, M., Chan, A. P. C., Le, Y., Hu, Y., & Xia, B. (2017a). Understanding collusive practices in Chinese construction projects. ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 143(3), 05016012.Google Scholar
  47. Shan, M., Hwang, B. G., & Wong, K. S. N. (2017b). A preliminary investigation of underground residential buildings: Advantages, disadvantages, and critical risks. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 70, 19–29.Google Scholar
  48. Shan, M., Le, Y., Yiu, K. T., Chan, A. P., & Hu, Y. (2017c). Investigating the underlying factors of corruption in the public construction sector: Evidence from China. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(6), 1643–1666.Google Scholar
  49. Sichombo, B., Muya, M., Shakantu, W., & Kaliba, C. (2009). The need for technical auditing in the Zambian construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 27(8), 821–832.Google Scholar
  50. Sohail, M., & Cavill, S. (2008). Accountability to prevent corruption in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(9), 729–738.Google Scholar
  51. Søreide, T. (2002). Corruption in public procurement. Causes, consequences and cures. Chr. Michelsen Intitute. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2435744/R%202002-1.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y. Accessed June 12, 2017.
  52. Stansbury, C., & Stansbury, N. (2008). Examples of corruption in infrastructure. Global Infrastructure Anti-Global Infrastructure Anti-Corruption Centre. http://www.giaccentre.org/documents/giacc.corruptionexamples.pdf. Accessed October 1, 2018.
  53. Tabish, S. Z. S., & Jha, K. N. (2011). Analyses and evaluation of irregularities in public procurement in India. Construction Management and Economics, 29(3), 261–274.Google Scholar
  54. Tabish, S. Z. S., & Jha, K. N. (2012). The impact of anti-corruption strategies on corruption free performance in public construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 30(1), 21–35.Google Scholar
  55. Tan, W. C. K. (2011). Practical research methods. Singapore: Pearson Custom.Google Scholar
  56. Transparency International. (2006). The role of transparency international in fighting corruption in infrastructure. Annual bank conference on development economics. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTDECABCTOK2006/Resources/OLeary.pdf. Accessed August 22, 2017.
  57. Vee, C., & Skitmore, C. (2003). Professional ethics in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 10(2), 117–127.Google Scholar
  58. Watts, A. (2016). Modern construction handbook. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  59. Willar, D., Trigunarsyah, B., & Coffey, V. (2016). Organisational culture and quality management system implementation in Indonesian construction companies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(2), 114–133.Google Scholar
  60. Wilson, J. M. (2003). Gantt charts: A centenary appreciation. European Journal of Operational Research, 149(2), 430–437.Google Scholar
  61. Wong, J. K. W., San Chan, J. K., & Wadu, M. J. (2016). Facilitating effective green procurement in construction projects: An empirical study of the enablers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 859–871.Google Scholar
  62. Yat Hung, C., Ping Chuen Albert, C., & Chi Man Eddie, H. (2002). Capital structure and profitability of the property and construction sectors in Hong Kong. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 20(6), 434–453.Google Scholar
  63. Zhang, B., Le, Y., Xia, B., & Skitmore, M. (2016). Causes of business-to-government corruption in the tendering process in China. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(2), 05016022.Google Scholar
  64. Zhang, B., Le, Y., Xia, B., & Skitmore, M. (2017). Causes of business-to-government corruption in the tendering process in China. Journal of Management in Engineering, 33(2), 05016022.Google Scholar
  65. Zou, P. X. (2006). Strategies for minimizing corruption in the construction industry in China. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 11(2), 15–29.Google Scholar
  66. Zuo, J., & Zillante, G. (2005). Project culture within construction projects: A literature review. In 13th international group for lean construction conference: Proceedings (p. 353). International Group on Lean Construction.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Building and Real EstateThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloonHong Kong
  2. 2.School of Civil EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangsha ShiChina
  3. 3.School of the Built Environment, City Centre CampusBirmingham City UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations