Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 635–642 | Cite as

Uterine Transplant: A Risk to Life or a Chance for Life?

  • Alankrita Taneja
  • Siddhartha Das
  • Syed Ather Hussain
  • Mohammed Madadin
  • Stany Wilfred Lobo
  • Huda Fatima
  • Ritesh G. MenezesEmail author
Brief Communication


Being inherently different from any other lifesaving organ transplant, uterine transplantation does not aim at saving lives but supporting the possibility to generate life. Unlike the kidneys or the liver, the uterus is not specifically a vital organ. Given the non-lifesaving nature of this procedure, questions have been raised about its feasibility. The ethical dilemma revolves around whether it is worth placing two lives at risk related to surgery and immunosuppression, amongst others, to enable a woman with absolute uterine factor infertility to experience the presence of an organ enabling childbirth. In the year 2000, the first uterine transplantation, albeit unsuccessful, was performed in Saudi Arabia from where it has spread to the rest of the world including Sweden, the United States and now recently India. The procedure is, however, still in the preclinical stages and several ethical, legal, social and religious concerns are yet to be addressed before it can be integrated into the clinical setting as standard of care for women with absolute uterine factor infertility.


Human organ transplantation Uterine transplant Human organ donation laws Ethical and legal aspects 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests


  1. Appelbaum, P. S., Roth, L. H., Lidz, C. W., Benson, P., & Winslade, W. (1987). False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. The Hastings Center Report, 17, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arora, M. (2017). Mom donates womb to daughter in India’s first uterus transplant. CNN News. Accessed 29 August 2017.
  3. Brannstrom, M. (2015). Uterus transplantation. Current opinion in organ transplantation, 20, 621–628.Google Scholar
  4. Brannstrom, M. (2017). Uterus transplantation and beyond. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine, 28, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brannstrom, M., Bokstrom, H., Dahm-Kahler, P., Diaz-Garcia, C., Ekberg, J., Enskog, A., et al. (2016). One uterus bridging three generations: First live birth after mother-to-daughter uterus transplantation. Fertility and Sterility, 106, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brannstrom, M., Johannesson, L., Bokstrom, H., Kvarnstrom, N., Molne, J., Dahm-Kahler, P., et al. (2015). Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet, 385, 607–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brannstrom, M., Johannesson, L., Dahm-Kahler, P., Enskog, A., Molne, J., Kvarnstrom, N., et al. (2014). First clinical uterus transplantation trial: A six-month report. Fertility and Sterility, 101, 1228–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Del Priore, G., & Gudipudi, D. K. (2014). Promise of uterine transplant–myth or a reality? Maturitas, 77, 20–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickens, B. M. (2016). Legal and ethical issues of uterus transplantation. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 133, 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. El-Akouri, R. R., Kurlberg, G., Dindelegan, G., Molne, J., Wallin, A., & Bransstrom, M. (2002). Heterotopic uterine transplantation by vascular anastomosis in the mouse. Journal of Endocrinology, 174, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Enskog, A., Johannesson, L., Chai, D. C., Dahm-Kahler, P., Marcickiewicz, J., Nyachieo, A., et al. (2010). Uterus transplantation in the baboon: Methodology and long-term function after auto-transplantation. Human Reproduction, 25, 1980–1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fageeh, W., Raffa, H., Jabbad, H., & Marzouki, A. (2002). Transplantation of the human uterus. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 76, 245–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gauthier, T., Garnault, D., Therme, J. F., Piver, P., Essig, M., Pichon, N., et al. (2015). Uterine transplantation: Is there a real demand? Gynecologie Obstetrique and Fertilite, 43, 133–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. GBD 2015 Healthcare Access and Quality Collaborators. (2017). Healthcare access and quality index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: A novel analysis from the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet, 390, 231–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilbert, F., O’Connell, C. D., Mladenovska, T., & Dodds, S. (2017). Print me an organ? Ethical and regulatory issues emerging from 3D bioprinting in medicine. Science and Engineering Ethics. Scholar
  16. Isa, N. M. (2016). Darurah (necessity) and its application in Islamic ethical assessment of medical applications: A review on Malaysian Fatwa. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 1319–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johannesson, L., Enskog, A., Dahm-Kahler, P., Hanafy, A., Chai, D. C., Mwenda, J. M., et al. (2012). Uterus transplantation in a non-human primate: Long-term follow-up after autologous transplantation. Human Reproduction, 27, 1640–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johannesson, L., Enskog, A., Molne, J., Diaz-Garcia, C., Hanafy, A., Dahm-Kahler, P., et al. (2013). Pre-clinical report on allogeneic uterus transplantation in non-human primates. Human Reproduction, 28, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Joshi, Y., & Pandit, S. (2017). 21-year-old Pune woman gets mother’s womb in India’s first uterus transplant. Hindustan Times. Accessed 29 August 2017.
  20. Lavoue, V., Vigneau, C., Duros, S., Boudjema, K., Leveque, J., Piver, P., et al. (2017). Which donor for uterus transplants: Brain-dead donor or living donor? A systematic review. Transplantation, 101, 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lefkowitz, A., Edwards, M., & Balayla, J. (2012). The Montreal criteria for the ethical feasibility of uterine transplantation. Transplant International, 25, 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Menezes, R. G., Bhagavath, P., & Adiga, P. K. (2007). Surrogacy in India. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 14, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Milliez, J. (2009). Uterine transplantation FIGO committee for the ethical aspects of human reproduction and women’s health. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 106, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olausson, M., Johannesson, L., Brattgard, D., Diaz-Garcia, C., Lundmark, C., Groth, K., et al. (2014). Ethics of uterus transplantation with live donors. Fertility and Sterility, 102, 40–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Petrini, C., Gainotti, S., Morresi, A., & Costa, A. N. (2017). Ethical issues in uterine transplantation: Psychological implications and informed consent. Transplantation Proceedings, 49, 707–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tryphonopoulos, P., Tzakis, A. G., Tekin, A., Johannesson, L., Rivas, K., Morales, P. R., et al. (2014). Allogeneic uterus transplantation in baboons: Surgical technique and challenges to long-term graft survival. Transplantation, 98, e51–e56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wranning, C. A., El-Akouri, R. R., Lundmark, C., Dahm-Kahler, P., Molne, J., Enskog, A., et al. (2006). Auto-transplantation of the uterus in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa): Surgical technique and early reperfusion events. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 32, 358–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wranning, C. A., Marcickiewicz, J., Enskog, A., Dahm-Kahler, P., Hanafy, A., & Brannstrom, M. (2010). Fertility after autologous ovine uterine–tubal–ovarian transplantation by vascular anastomosis to the external iliac vessels. Human Reproduction, 25, 1973–1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alankrita Taneja
    • 1
  • Siddhartha Das
    • 2
  • Syed Ather Hussain
    • 3
  • Mohammed Madadin
    • 4
  • Stany Wilfred Lobo
    • 5
  • Huda Fatima
    • 3
  • Ritesh G. Menezes
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Armed Forces Medical CollegePuneIndia
  2. 2.Department of Forensic Medicine and ToxicologyJawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER)PuducherryIndia
  3. 3.Dow Medical CollegeDow University of Health SciencesKarachiPakistan
  4. 4.Department of Pathology, College of MedicineImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityDammamSaudi Arabia
  5. 5.Touro College of Osteopathic MedicineMiddletownUSA

Personalised recommendations