Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 1801–1807 | Cite as

Central Europe: Ethical Overlaps of Environmental and Economic Interests in Coming Years

  • Zdeněk CahaEmail author


Despite the size and thanks to the rich brown coal reserves, the Czech Republic is one of the leading energy producers in Europe, and the 7th biggest exporter of electricity in the world. However, following the climate change mitigation, the novel energy policy that enhances the reduction of coal mining is about to be implemented. A preliminary material flow analysis of the Czech energy sector was carried out. The data obtained confirmed that this government act would result in a dramatic reduction of revenues from electricity sales. Conversely, increased costs would be necessary in order to modernize nuclear power plants and promote the production of renewable energy. In addition, the economic analysis revealed that the act might be prejudicial to economic relations in Central and Western-European countries as some of them are significantly dependent on the electricity imported from the Czech Republic. Disputes between engineers and politicians were highlighted. The aforementioned interrelations were subsequently analyzed and a conclusion was made stating that global interests should have the highest moral priority.


Energy policy Moral responsibility Material flow analysis Economics 


  1. Atilgan, B., & Azapagic, A. (2016). An integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Turkey. Energy Policy, 93, 168–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharya, M., Paramati, S. R., Ozturk, I., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from top 38 countries. Applied Energy, 162, 733–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2004). Practical handbook of material flow analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Lewis.Google Scholar
  4. Burgholzer, B., & Auer, H. (2016). Cost/benefit analysis of transmission grid expansion to enable further integration of renewable electricity generation in Austria. Renewable Energy, 97, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cansino, J. M., Pablo-Romero, M. D. P., Román, R., & Yñiguez, R. (2011). Promoting renewable energy sources for heating and cooling in EU-27 countries. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3803–3812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Černoch, F., & Zapletalová, V. (2015). Hinkley point C: A new chance for nuclear power plant construction in central Europe? Energy Policy, 83, 165–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frantál, B., & Nováková, E. (2014). A curse of coal? Exploring unintended regional consequences of coal energy in the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports, 22(2), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frélichová, J., Vačkář, D., Pártl, A., Loučková, B., Harmáčková, Z. V., & Lorencová, E. (2014). Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Services, 8, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gass, V., Schmidt, J., Strauss, F., & Schmid, E. (2013). Assessing the economic wind power potential in Austria. Energy Policy, 53, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hašková, S. (2017). Holistic assessment and ethical disputation on a new trend in solid biofuels. Science and engineering ethics, 23(2), 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jehličková, B., & Morris, R. (2007). Effectiveness of policy instruments for supporting the use of waste wood as a renewable energy resource in the Czech Republic. Energy Policy, 35(1), 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kolář, L., Kužel, S., Peterka, J., Štindl, P., & Plát, V. (2008). Agrochemical value of organic matter of fermenter wastes in biogas production. Plant, Soil and Environment, 54(8), 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kopáček, J., & Veselý, J. (2005). Sulfur and nitrogen emissions in the Czech Republic and Slovakia from 1850 till 2000. Atmospheric Environment, 39(12), 2179–2188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koptíková, L., Hladil, J., Slavík, L., Čejchan, P., & Bábek, O. (2010). Fine-grained non-carbonate particles embedded in neritic to pelagic limestones (Lochkovian to Emsian, Prague Synform, Czech Republic): Composition, provenance and links to magnetic susceptibility and gamma-ray logs. Geologica Belgica, 13, 407–430.Google Scholar
  15. Mardoyan, A., & Braun, P. (2015). Analysis of Czech subsidies for solid biofuels. International Journal of Green Energy, 12, 405–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maroušek, J. (2013a). Study on commercial scale steam explosion of winter Brassica napus straw. International Journal of Green Energy, 10(9), 944–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Maroušek, J. (2013b). Use of continuous pressure shockwaves apparatus in rapeseed oil processing. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 15(4), 721–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maroušek, J. (2014). Novel technique to enhance the disintegration effect of the pressure waves on oilseeds. Industrial Crops and Products, 53, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Váchal, J., & Vaníčková, R. (2014). Nutrient management in processing of steam exploded lignocellulose phytomass. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 37(11), 1945–1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Vaníčková, R., Maroušková, A., Váchal, J., et al. (2015a). Techno-economic assessment of processing the cellulose casings waste. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17, 2441–2446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Žák, J., Vaníčková, R., Maroušková, A., et al. (2016). Polemics on ethical aspects in the compost business. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(2), 581–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maroušek, J., Itoh, S., Higa, O., Kondo, Y., Ueno, M., Suwa, R., et al. (2012). The use of underwater high voltage discharges to improve the efficiency of Jatropha curcas L. biodiesel production. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, 59(6), 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maroušek, J., & Kwan, J. T. H. (2013). Use of pressure manifestations following the water plasma expansion for phytomass disintegration. Water Science and Technology, 67(8), 1695–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maroušek, J., Maroušková, A., Myšková, K., Váchal, J., Vochozka, M., & Žák, J. (2015b). Techno-economic assessment of collagen casings waste management. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12, 3385–3390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maroušek, J., Vochozka, M., Plachý, J., & Žák, J. (2017). Glory and misery of biochar. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(2), 311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marques, A. C., & Fuinhas, J. A. (2012). Are public policies towards renewables successful? Evidence from European countries. Renewable Energy, 44, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Novák, V., Vokoun, M., Stellner, F., & Vochozka, M. (2016). Institutional analysis of contemporary regional labour market in the Czech Republic. E+M Ekonomie a Management, 19(3), 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Odeh, N. A., & Cockerill, T. T. (2008). Life cycle analysis of UK coal fired power plants. Energy Conversion and Management, 49, 212–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Průša, J., Klimešová, A., & Janda, K. (2013). Consumer loss in Czech photovoltaic power plants in 2010–2011. Energy Policy, 63, 747–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rieder, M., Crelling, J. C., Šustai, O., Drábek, M., Weiss, Z., & Klementová, M. (2007). Arsenic in iron disulfides in a brown coal from the North Bohemian Basin, Czech Republic. International Journal of Coal Geology, 71(2), 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smrčka, L. (2011). Photovoltaics in the Czech Republic-example of a distorted market. In 6th IASME/WSEAS international conference on energy and environment (pp. 378–383).Google Scholar
  32. Spath, P., Mann, M., & Kerr, D. (1999). Life cycle assessment of coal-fired power production. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swider, D. J., Beurskens, L., Davidson, S., Twidell, J., Pyrko, J., Prüggler, W., et al. (2008). Conditions and costs for renewables electricity grid connection: Examples in Europe. Renewable Energy, 33(8), 1832–1842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Valle-Zermeño, R., Formosa, J., & Chimenos, J. M. (2015). Wet flue gas desulfurization using alkaline agents. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 31, 303–327.Google Scholar
  35. Van Wees, M. T., Uyterlinde, M. A., & Maly, M. (2002). Energy efficiency and renewable energy policy in the Czech Republic within the framework of accession to the European Union. Energy, 27(11), 1057–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vokoun, M. (2016a). The economics and politics of process innovation and the sustainable urban development. Procedia Engineering, 161, 2229–2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vokoun, M. (2016b). Innovation behaviour of firms in a small open economy: The case of the Czech manufacturing industry. Empirica, 43(1), 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vokoun, M., Polanecký, L., & Stellner, F. (2015). The impact of the recent economic crisis on the food industry in the Czech and Slovak Republic. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 142–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wright, L. A., Kemp, S., & Williams, I. (2011). ‘Carbon footprinting’: Towards a universally accepted definition. Carbon Management, 2(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Würzburg, K., Labandeira, X., & Linares, P. (2013). Renewable generation and electricity prices: Taking stock and new evidence for Germany and Austria. Energy Economics, 40, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao, J., Hong, J., Song, Z., Wang, Q., Zhao, X., & Ma, C. (2015). Cost combined life cycle assessment of lignite-based electricity generation. Fuel, 159, 666–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Institute of Technology and Business in České BudějoviceCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations