Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do?
In the internet era spam has become a big problem. Researchers are troubled with unsolicited or bulk spam emails inviting them to publish. However, this strategy has helped predatory journals hunt their prey and earn money. These journals have grown tremendously during the past few years despite serious efforts by researchers and scholarly organizations to hinder their growth. Predatory journals and publishers are often based in developing countries, and they potentially target researchers from these counties by using different tactics identified in previous research. In response to the spread of predatory publishing, scientists are trying to develop criteria and guidelines to help avoid them—for example, the recently reported “predatory rate”. This article attempts to (a) highlight the strategies used by predatory journals to convince researchers to publish with them, (b) report their article processing charges, (c) note their presence in Jeffrey Beall’s List of Predatory Publishers, (d) rank them based on the predatory rate, and (e) put forward suggestions for junior researchers (especially in developing counties), who are the most likely targets of predatory journals.
KeywordsEditorial policy Impact factor Peer review Predatory journals Research fraud
I thank K. Shashok (Author AID in the Eastern Mediterranean) for improving the use of English in the manuscript and for helpful suggestions.
Aamir Raoof Memon contributed to all the aspects of this manuscript and takes the responsibility of it.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The author does not have any potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
- Beall, J. (2015). Be careful using NCBI databases as journal whitelists. https://scholarlyoa.com/2015/11/19/be-careful-using-ncbi-databases-as-journal-whitelists/. Accessed 7 Jan 2017.
- Beall, J. (2016a). Don’t use PubMed as a journal whitelist. https://scholarlyoa.com/2016/10/20/dont-use-pubmed-as-a-journal-whitelist/. Accessed 7 Jan 2017.
- Beall, J. (2016b). Questionable spam email from a Springer Nature Journal. https://scholarlyoa.com/2016/12/15/questionable-spam-email-from-a-springernature-journal/. Accessed 8 Jan 2017.
- Beall, J. (2017a). Beall’s list of predatory publishers 2017. https://scholarlyoa.com/2017/01/03/bealls-list-of-predatory-publishers-2017/. Accessed 7 Jan 2017.
- Committee on Publication Ethics, Directory of Open Access Journals, Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, and World Association of Medical Editors. (2015). Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. http://publicationethics.org/files/Principles_of_Transparency_and_Best_Practice_in_Scholarly_Publishingv2.pdf. Accessed 8 January 2017.
- Dadkhah, M., Maliszewski, T., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016). Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, 12(3), 353–362. doi: 10.1007/s12024-016-9785-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elmes, J. (2017). Journals blacklist creator blames university for website closure. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/journals-blacklist-creator-blames-university-website-closure. Accessed 3 July 2017.
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2016). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. Accessed 8 January 2017.
- Jawad, F. (2017). The race for publishing original biomedical research articles in Pakistan. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 67(1), 1–2.Google Scholar
- Laine, C., & Winker, M. A. (2017). Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals. http://www.wame.org/identifying-predatory-or-pseudo-journals. Accessed 5 March 2017.
- Memon, A. R. (2016). ResearchGate is no longer reliable: leniency towards ghost journals may decrease its impact on the scientific community. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 66(12), 1643–1647.Google Scholar
- Memon, A. R. (2017b). Research publications and education in Pakistani medical universities: Avoiding predatory journals and improving the quality of research. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical, 67(6), 830–833.Google Scholar
- Pulla, P. (2016). Predatory publishers gain foothold in Indian academia’s upper echelon. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/12/predatory-publishers-gain-foothold-indian-academia-s-upper-echelon. Accessed 5 March 2017. doi: 10.1126/science.aal0526.