Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 645–646 | Cite as

The Implications of Using Internet Search Engines in Structured Scientific Reviews

  • Marko CurkovicEmail author


  1. Adams, J. M., Hillier-Brown, F., Moore, H., Lake, A., Araujo-Soares, V., White, M. J., et al. (2016). Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: Critical reflections on three case studies. Systematic Reviews, 5, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bozdag, E., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Breaking the filter bubble: Democracy and design. Ethics and Information Technology, 17, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bramer, W. M., Giustini, D., & Kramer, B. M. (2016). Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: A prospective study. Systematic Reviews, 5, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cooper, C., Booth, A., Britten, N., & Garside, R. (2017). A comparison of results of empirical studies of supplementary search techniques and recommendations in review methodology handbooks: A methodological review. Systematic Reviews, 6, 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curkovic, M. (2017). Need for controlling of the filter bubble effect. Science and Engineering Ethics. Scholar
  6. Piasecki, J., Waligora, M., & Dranseika, V. (2017). Google search as an additional source in systematic reviews. Science and Engineering Ethics. Scholar
  7. Reuters. (2017). U.S. regulators ditch net neutrality rules as legal battles loom. Accessed December 17, 2017.
  8. Stansfield, C., Dickson, K., & Bangpan, M. (2016). Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: How can we be systematic? Systematic Reviews, 5, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Psychiatric Hospital VrapceZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations