The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans
- 3.5k Downloads
This article applies tools from argumentation theory to slippery slope arguments used in current ethical debates on genetic engineering. Among the tools used are argumentation schemes, value-based argumentation, critical questions, and burden of proof. It is argued that so-called drivers such as social acceptance and rapid technological development are also important factors that need to be taken into account alongside the argumentation scheme. It is shown that the slippery slope argument is basically a reasonable (but defeasible) form of argument, but is often flawed when used in ethical debates because of failures to meet the requirements of its scheme.
KeywordsArgumentation schemes Genetic enhancement Gene editing Germline therapy
I would like to thank The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for Insight Grant 435-2012-0104 that supported the work in this paper, and acknowledge my indebtedness to the four very helpful referees who provided me with many detailed constructive criticisms, insightful comments, and corrections.
- Barry, V. E. (1976). Practical logic. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Beardsley, M. C. (1966). Thinking straight. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Bench-Capon, T. J. M., & Dunne, P. E. (2002). Value based argumentation frameworks, Technical report: http://intranet.csc.liv.ac.uk/research/techreports/tr2002/ulcs-02-001.pdf.
- Hook, S. (1970). The paradoxes of freedom. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Hurley, P. (1982). A concise introduction to logic. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Kneale, W., & Kneale, M. (1962). The development of logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lifton, R. J. (1986). The Nazi doctors: Medical killing and the psychology of genocide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Rizzo, M. J., & Whitman, D. C. (2003). The camel’s nose in the tent: Rules, theories and slippery slopes. UCLA Law Review, 51, 539–592.Google Scholar
- Saliger, F. (2007). The dam burst and slippery slope argument in medical law and medical ethics. Zeitschrift fur Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, 9, 341–352.Google Scholar
- Walton, D. (1992). Slippery slope arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar