Engineering Students’ Views of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Case Study from Petroleum Engineering
- 643 Downloads
The mining and energy industries present unique challenges to engineers, who must navigate sometimes competing responsibilities and codes of conduct, such as personal senses of right and wrong, professional ethics codes, and their employers’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the current dominant framework used by industry to conceptualize firms’ responsibilities to their stakeholders, yet has it plays a relatively minor role in engineering ethics education. In this article, we report on an interdisciplinary pedagogical intervention in a petroleum engineering seminar that sought to better prepare engineering undergraduate students to critically appraise the strengths and limitations of CSR as an approach to reconciling the interests of industry and communities. We find that as a result of the curricular interventions, engineering students were able to expand their knowledge of the social, rather than simply environmental and economic dimensions of CSR. They remained hesitant, however, in identifying the links between those social aspects of CSR and their actual engineering work. The study suggests that CSR may be a fruitful arena from which to illustrate the profoundly sociotechnical dimensions of the engineering challenges relevant to students’ future careers.
KeywordsEngineering ethics Corporate social responsibility Petroleum engineering Pedagogical strategies Student learning
This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1540298. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Research with Human Subjects
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Baillie, C. (2011). A multidisciplinary approach to curriculum development for engineering graduates who are socially and environmentally just. 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.Google Scholar
- Clarke, C. E., Boudet, H. S., & Bugden, D. (2013). Fracking in the American mind: Americans’ views on hydraulic fracturing in September, 2012. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/reports.
- Davis, R., & Franks, D. M. (2014). Costs of company–community conflict in the extractive sector. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Report. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/CSRI/research/Costs%20of%20Conflict_Davis%20%20Franks.pdf.
- Dobb, E. (2013). The new oil landscape. National Geographic. Retrieved from http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2013/03/bakken-shale-oil/dobb-text.
- Dolan, C., & Rajak, D. (Eds.). (2016). The anthropology of corporate social responsibility. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
- Douglas, D., Papadopoulos, G., & Boutelle, J. (2009). Citizen engineer: A handbook for socially responsible engineering. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Fergus, J.W. (2013). Materials engineering as a catalyst for sustainability education. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google Scholar
- Frey, W.J., Papadopoulos, C., Castro-Sitiriche, M., Zevallos, F., & Echevarria, D. (2012). On integrating appropriate technology responsive to community capabilities: A case study from Haiti. 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Explosition.Google Scholar
- Galambosi, A., & Ozelkan, E. (2011). Integrating sustainability into systems engineering curriculum. 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google Scholar
- Kirsch, S. (2014). Mining capitalism: Dialectical relations between corporations & their critics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Koehn, J., Nagumantri, P., & Koehn, K. (2008). Environmental concepts of civil/construction engineering students. 2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google Scholar
- Lucena, J., Schneider, J., & Leydens, J. (2010). Engineering and sustainable community development. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar
- Rajak, D. (2011). In good company: An anatomy of corporate social responsibility. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rulifson, G., Bielefeldt, A., & Thomas, W. (2014). Understanding of social responsibility by first year engineering students: Ethical foundations and courses. 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. M. (2017). From corporate social responsibility to creating shared value: Contesting responsibilization and the mining industry. In Competing responsibilities: The ethics and politics of contemporary life. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Society of Petroleum Engineers. (2013). Our industry, public perception. Special Issue of the Way Ahead, 9(2), 1–32.Google Scholar
- Sutkus, J., Finelli, C., Carpenter, D., & Harding, T. (2009). An examination of student experiences related to engineering ethics: Initial findings. 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google Scholar
- Tougaw, D., & Schroeder, D. (2005). Collaborative teaching of a course in technology, society and the natural environment. 2005 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google Scholar
- United Nations Environmental Program. (2009). Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. New York: UNEP.Google Scholar