Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct
- 419 Downloads
The prevalence and characteristics of research misconduct have mainly been studied in highly developed countries. In moderately or poorly developed countries such as Croatia, data on research misconduct are scarce. The primary aim of this study was to determine the rates at which scientists report committing or observing the most serious forms of research misconduct, such as falsification , fabrication, plagiarism, and violation of authorship rules in the Croatian scientific community. Additionally, we sought to determine the degree of development and the extent of implementation of the system for defining and regulating research misconduct in a typical scientific community in Croatia. An anonymous questionnaire was distributed among 1232 Croatian scientists at the University of Rijeka in 2012/2013 and 237 (19.2 %) returned the survey. Based on the respondents who admitted having committed research misconduct, 9 (3.8 %) admitted to plagiarism, 22 (9.3 %) to data falsification, 9 (3.8 %) to data fabrication, and 60 (25.3 %) respondents admitted to violation of authorship rules. Based on the respondents who admitted having observed research misconduct of fellow scientists, 72 (30.4 %) observed plagiarism, 69 (29.1 %) observed data falsification, 46 (19.4 %) observed data fabrication, and 132 (55.7 %) respondents admitted having observed violation of authorship rules. The results of our study indicate that the efficacy of the system for managing research misconduct in Croatia is poor. At the University of Rijeka there is no document dedicated exclusively to research integrity, describing the values that should be fostered by a scientist and clarifying the forms of research misconduct and what constitutes a questionable research practice. Scientists do not trust ethical bodies and the system for defining and regulating research misconduct; therefore the observed cases of research misconduct are rarely reported. Finally, Croatian scientists are not formally educated about responsible conduct of research at any level of their formal education. All mentioned indicate possible reasons for higher rates of research misconduct among Croatian scientists in comparison with scientists in highly developed countries.
KeywordsResearch misconduct Research integrity Institutional policies and procedures Questionable research practices
We thank Prof. Elvio Baccarini, president of the Council of Honor of the University of Rijeka, on his constructive advice for designing the survey questionnaire and Dr. Aleksandra Mišak and Elizabeth Hughes Komljen for excellent language consultations.
The study is part of two research projects: “Acceptance and awareness of the principles of research ethics of University of Rijeka scientists” (Project Number: 3%-12-33) funded by the University of Rijeka and “Attitude toward scientific plagiarism, its prevalence and characteristics” (Project Number: 13.06.1.2.29) funded by the University of Rijeka Foundation.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Anderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists??? Misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 853–860. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bilić-Zulle, L., Frković, V., Turk, T., Azman, J., & Petrovecki, M. (2005). Prevalence of plagiarism among medical students. Croatian Medical Journal, 46(1), 126–131.Google Scholar
- ESF, & ALLEA. (2011). The European code of conduct for research integrity, 1–20. doi: 10.1037/e648332011-002.
- Kattenbraker, M. (2007). Health education research and publication: Ethical considerations and the response of health educators. Carbondale: Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale.Google Scholar
- Kleinert, S., & Wager, E. (2010). Responsible research publication: international standards for authors A position statement. 2nd world conference on research integrity, Singapore, July 22–24, 2010. http://publicationethics.org/files/Internationalstandards_authors_forwebsite_11_Nov_2011_0.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2015.
- Nacionalno vijeće za znanost, (National Council for Science). (2013). Pravilnik o uvjetima za izbor u znanstvena zvanja (Ordinance on Election into Scientific Titles) Narodne novine.Google Scholar
- Petrovecki, M., & Scheetz, M. (2001). Croatian Medical Journal introduces culture, control, and the study of research integrity. Croatian Medical Journal, 42(1), 7–13.Google Scholar
- Puljak, L. (2007). Croatia founded a national body for ethics in science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(2), 191–193. http://apps.isiknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=UA&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=5&SID=V2s1Lh3tIewOnt2cQDB&page=1&doc=6. Accessed 18 Dec 2015.
- Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., Mavrinac, M., & Petrovecki, M. (2010). Attitudes toward plagiarism among pharmacy and medical biochemistry students—Cross-sectional survey study. Biochemia Medica, 20(3), 279–281.Google Scholar
- Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., & Petrovecki, M. (2008). On academic plagiarism in Europe: An analytical approach based on four studies. DIGITHUM: The Humanities in the Dital Era, (10), 13–18. http://www.uoc.edu/digithum/10/dt/eng/pupovac_bilic-zulle_petrovecki.pdf.
- Science Europe Working Group on Research Integrity. (2015). Seven reasons to care about integrity in research.Google Scholar
- Swazey, J. P., Anderson, M. S., & Seashore, L. K. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist, 81, 542–543.Google Scholar
- World Conference on Research Integrity. (2010). Singapore statement on research integrity. http://www.singaporestatement.org/statement.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2016.
- World Conference on Research Integrity. (2013). Montreal statement on research integrity in cross-boundary research collaborations. http://www.researchintegrity.org/Statements/MontrealStatementEnglish.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2016.
- Zwirn Periš, Ž., & Avilov, M. (2013). Nastavnici i suradnici u nastavi na visokim učilištima u ak. g. 2012./2013. - priopćenje [Teaching staff at institutions of higher education 2012/2013 academic year - first relase]. Croatian Bureau of Statiatics. http://www.dzs.hr/Hrv_Eng/publication/2013/08-01-01_01_2013.htm. Accessed 25 Nov 2015.