A Simple Framework for Evaluating Authorial Contributions for Scientific Publications
- 431 Downloads
A simple tool is provided to assist researchers in assessing contributions to a scientific publication, for ease in evaluating which contributors qualify for authorship, and in what order the authors should be listed. The tool identifies four phases of activity leading to a publication—Conception and Design, Data Acquisition, Analysis and Interpretation, and Manuscript Preparation. By comparing a project participant’s contribution in a given phase to several specified thresholds, a score of up to five points can be assigned; the contributor’s scores in all four phases are summed to yield a total “contribution score”, which is compared to a threshold to determine which contributors merit authorship. This tool may be useful in a variety of contexts in which a systematic approach to authorial credit is desired.
KeywordsAuthorship Scientific publications Ethics
- Ahmed, S. M., Maurana, C. A., Engle, J. A., Uddin, D. E., & Glaus, K. D. (1997). A method for assigning authorship in multi-authored publications. Family Medicine, 29, 42.Google Scholar
- American Chemical Society. (2012). Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research. Washington: ACS Publications.Google Scholar
- Belwalkar, B., & Toaddy, S. (2014). Authorship determination scorecard. American Psychological Society. http://www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-determination-scorecard.pdf.
- ICMJE. (2013). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.Google Scholar
- Kosslyn, S. (2002). Criteria for authorship. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic562342.files/authorship_criteria_Nov02.pdf.
- NIH. (2007). Guidelines for the conduct of research in the intramural research program at NIH. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, R. H. (1987). A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 68, 8.Google Scholar
- Steneck, N. H. (2007). ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar