Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 1553–1560 | Cite as

Is There a Role for Publication Consultants and How Should Their Contribution be Recognized?

Opinion

Abstract

When a scientific paper, dissertation or thesis is published the author(s) have a duty to report who has contributed to the work. This recognition can take several forms such as authorship, relevant acknowledgments and by citing previous work. There is a growing industry where publication consultants will work with authors, research groups or even institutions to help get their work published, or help submit their dissertation/thesis. This help can range from proof reading, data collection, analysis (including statistics), helping with the literature review and identifying suitable journals/conferences. In this opinion article we question whether these external services are required, given that institutions should provide this support and that experienced researchers should be qualified to carry out these activities. If these services are used, we argue that their use should at least be made transparent either by the consultant being an author on the paper, or by being acknowledged on the paper, dissertation or thesis. We also argue that publication consultants should provide an annual return that details the papers, dissertations and thesis that they have consulted on.

Keywords

Ethics Agency Consultant Research misconduct Transparency 

References

  1. Anon, (1983). The murky world of toxicity testing. Science, 220(4602), 1130–1132. doi:10.1126/science.6857237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, M. (2012). Independent labs to verify high-profile papers: Reproducibility initiative aims to speed up preclinical research. Nature (News). doi:10.1038/nature.2012.11176
  3. Begley, C. G., & Ellis, L. M. (2012). Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483(7391), 531–533. doi:10.1038/483531a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2003). The craft of research (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kendall, G., Bai, R., Błazewicz, J., De Causmaecker, P., Gendreau, M., & John, R., et al. (in press). Good laboratory practice for optimization research. Journal of the Operational Research Society.Google Scholar
  6. Philips, M., & Pugh, D. S. (2006). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors (4th ed.). New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Prinz, F., Schlange, T., & Asadullah, K. (2011). Believe it or not: How much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 10(7391), 10–11. doi:10.1038/nrd3439-c1 Google Scholar
  8. Wager, E., & Kleinert, S. (2011). Promoting research integrity in a global environment, chap. Responsible Research Publication: International Standards for Authors: A position statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22–24, 2010 (pp. 309–316). Imperial College Press/World Scientific Publishing. http://bit.ly/1VM7rGQ. Accessed 26 Sep 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ASAP Research Group, School of Computer ScienceUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.University of Nottingham Malaysia CampusSemenyihMalaysia
  3. 3.School of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations