Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 1051–1061 | Cite as

Protecting Ideas: Ethical and Legal Considerations When a Grant’s Principal Investigator Changes

  • Leonidas G. KoniarisEmail author
  • Mary I. Coombs
  • Eric M. Meslin
  • Teresa A. Zimmers
Review Paper

Abstract

Ethical issues related the responsible conduct of research involve questions concerning the rights and obligations of investigators to propose, design, implement, and publish research. When a principal investigator (PI) transfers institutions during a grant cycle, financial and recognition issues need to be addressed to preserve all parties’ obligations and best interests in a mutually beneficial way. Although grants often transfer with the PI, sometimes they do not. Maintaining a grant at an institution after the PI leaves does not negate the grantee institution’s obligation to recognize the PI’s original ideas, contributions, and potential rights to some forms of expression and compensation. Issues include maintaining a role for the PI in determining how to take credit for, share and publish results that involve his or her original ideas. Ascribing proper credit can become a thorny issue. This paper provides a framework for addressing situations and disagreements that may occur when a new PI continues the work after the original PI transfers. Included are suggestions for proactively developing institutional mechanisms that address such issues. Considerations include how to develop solutions that comply with the responsible conduct of research, equitably resolve claims regarding reporting of results, and avoid the possibility of plagiarism.

Keywords

Grant transfers Grant stipulations Grant awards Principal investigator PI transfer Authorship Plagiarism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Lana Christian for her expert editing assistance with this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Potential conflict of interest

LGK has transferred a grant to another investigator.

References

  1. Assembly Bill 609, Chapter 789. (2014). State-funded research: State Department of Public Health. State of California.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R. D., & Stewart, L. A. (2011). University research funding: The United States is behind and falling. The information technology and innovation foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al. (2011). No. 09-1159. Retrieved from: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-1159.pdf.
  4. Bouville, M. (2008). Plagiarism: Words and ideas. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browning, D. (2014). Decline in federal grants threatens state research. Star Tribune. Retrieved from: http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/241990681.html.
  6. Council on Governmental Relations (2001). Managing externally funded programs at colleges and universities a guideline to good management practices.Google Scholar
  7. Council on Governmental Relations (2011a). A tutorial on technology transfer in U.S. Colleges and Universities.Google Scholar
  8. Council on Governmental Relations (2011b). Access to rights and responsibilities sharing and retention of research data: Rights and responsibilities.Google Scholar
  9. Faust, D. G. (2010). The Role of the University in a Changing World. Presented at the Royal Irish Academy, Trinity College; Dublin, Ireland; 30 June 2010. Retrieved from: http://www.harvard.edu/president/speech/2010/role-university-changing-world.
  10. Government Accounting Office (2013). Biomedical research: NIH should assess the impact of growth in indirect costs on its mission. Retrieved from: http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/658087.pdf.
  11. Harper, G. K. (2007). Copyright Crash Course: Who Owns What? University of Texas Libraries. Retrieved from: http://copyright.lib.utexas.edu/whoowns.html.
  12. Henderson, J. A., & Smith, J. J. (2002). Academia, Industry and the Bayh–Dole act: an implied duty to commercialize.Google Scholar
  13. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2015) Defining the role of authors and contributors. Retrieved from: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html.
  14. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1991). Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. New England Journal of Medicine, 324(6), 424–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lawrence, C., & Gunther, G. (1990). Good speech, bad speech. Stanford Lawyer, 24(1), 4–9.Google Scholar
  16. Mangan, K. S., & Blumenstyk, G. (2000). Colleges’ conflict-of-interest rules are criticized as vague. The chronicle of higher education. Retrieved from: http://chronicle.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/article/Colleges-Conflict-of-Interest/13975/.
  17. National Institutes of Health (2010a). Grants and funding: NIH grants policy statement part II: Terms and conditions of NIH grant awards. Retrieved from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2010/nihgps_ch8.htm.
  18. National Institutes of Health (2010b). Equipment under grants. Retrieved from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/equipment_faqs.htm.
  19. National Institutes of Health (2013). Types of grant programs. Retrieved from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/funding_program.htm.
  20. National Institutes of Health (2015). NIH budget: Research for the people. Retrieved from: http://www.nih.gov/about/budget.htm.
  21. National Institutes of Health (2015) NIH peer review: Grants and cooperative agreements. Retrieved from: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/PeerReview22713webv2.pdf.
  22. Office of Research Integrity; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1994). ORI Provides Working Definition of Plagiarism. ORI Newsletter, 3(1), 5–6.Google Scholar
  23. Sargent, J. F. Jr. (2013). Federal research and development funding: FY 2013. Congressional Research Service, 7-5700, R42410.Google Scholar
  24. Shamoo, A. E., & Resnik, D. B. (2009). On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research (3rd ed.). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. (2010). Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotheraphy. 1(1), 42–58.Google Scholar
  26. Who Owns Patent Rights: Employer or Inventor? (2015) Retrieved from: http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/who-owns-patent-rights-employer-inventor.html.
  27. Zinner, D. E., & Campbell, E. G. (2009). Life-science research within U.S. academic medical centers. JAMA, 302(9), 969–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonidas G. Koniaris
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mary I. Coombs
    • 2
  • Eric M. Meslin
    • 3
  • Teresa A. Zimmers
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.School of LawUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA
  3. 3.Indiana University Center for BioethicsUniversity of Indiana School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA
  4. 4.Department of Cell Biology and AnatomyIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations