Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 1537–1549 | Cite as

The Ethics of Ironic Science in Its Search for Spoof

  • Maryam Ronagh
  • Lawrence SouderEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The goal of most scientific research published in peer-review journals is to discover and report the truth. However, the research record includes tongue-in-cheek papers written in the conventional form and style of a research paper. Although these papers were intended to be taken ironically, bibliographic database searches show that many have been subsequently cited as valid research, some in prestigious journals. We attempt to understand why so many readers cited such ironic science seriously. We draw from the literature on error propagation in research publication for ways categorize citations. We adopt the concept of irony from the fields of literary and rhetorical criticism to detect, characterize, and analyze the interpretations in the more than 60 published research papers that cite an instance of ironic science. We find a variety of interpretations: some citing authors interpret the research as valid and accept it, some contradict or reject it, and some acknowledge its ironic nature. We conclude that publishing ironic science in a research journal can lead to the same troubles posed by retracted research, and we recommend relevant changes to publication guidelines.

Keywords

Irony Retraction Research publication Transparency Error propagation 

References

  1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Averbeck, J. (2010). Irony and language expectancy theory: Evaluations of expectancy violation outcomes. Communication Studies, 61(3), 356–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berk, L. B. (2006). Primer on integrative oncology. Hematology-Oncology Clinics of North America, 20(1), 213–222. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2006.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth, W. C. (1974). A rhetoric of irony. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brownnutt, M. J. (2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer—Hope should never be squashed by being told that things cannot happen. British Medical Journal, 324(7344), 1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cadge, W. (2012). Possibilities and limits of medical science: Debates over double-blind clinical trials of intercessory prayer. Zygon, 47(1), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, D. A. (2011). The power of observation. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 66(2), 71–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00963.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coruh, B. A., Ayele, H., Pugh, M., & Mulligan, T. (2005). Does religious activity improve health outcomes? A critical review of the recent literature. Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing, 1(3), 186–191. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2005.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. da Rosa, M. I., Silva, F. R., Silva, B. R., Costa, L. C., Bergamo, A. M., Silva, N. C., … & Azevedo, R. (2013). A randomized clinical trial on the effects of remote intercessory prayer in the adverse outcomes of pregnancies. Cienc. Saude Coletiva, 18(8), 2379–2384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Saussure, L., & Schulz, P. (2009). Subjectivity out of irony. Semiotica, 173(1), 397–416.Google Scholar
  11. Dossey, L. (2011). CAM, religion, and Schrodinger’s one mind. Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing, 7(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2010.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisterhold, J., Attardo, S., & Boxer, D. (2006). Reactions to irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(8), 1239–1256. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gammack, J. K., & Morley, J. E. (2004). Anti-aging medicine-the good, the bad, and the ugly. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 20(2), 157. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2004.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giacomini, M. (2009). Theory-Based Medicine and the Role of Evidence: why the emperor needs new clothes, again. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2), 234–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Heard, S. B. (2014). On whimsy, jokes, and beauty: can scientific writing be enjoyed? Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hettiaratchy, S., & Hemsley, C. (2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer—Paper proves power of statistics, not prayer. British Medical Journal, 324(7344), 1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ho, V. K. Y. (2011). Medicine, Methodology, And Values: trade-offs in clinical science and practice. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 54(2), 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hodge, D. R. (2007). A systematic review of the empirical literature on intercessory prayer. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(2), 174–187. doi: 10.1177/1049731506296170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hopkins, J. (2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer—”You cannae break the laws of physics, captain”. British Medical Journal, 324(7344), 1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howick, J. (2011). Exposing the vanities-and a qualified defense-of mechanistic reasoning in health care decision making. Philosophy of Science, 78(5), 926–940. doi: 10.1086/662561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunink, M. G. M. (2004). Does evidence based medicine do more good than harm? British Medical Journal, 329(7473), 1051. doi: 10.1136/BMJ.329.7473.1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kierkegaard, S., & Capel, L. M. (1966). The concept of irony: With constant reference to socrates. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  24. Kompanje, E. J. O. (2013). ‘Real men wear kilts’. The anecdotal evidence that wearing a Scottish kilt has influence on reproductive potential: how much is true? Scottish Medical Journal, 58(1), e1–e5. doi: 10.1177/0036933012474600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lachmann, P. J. (2009). God: The failed hypothesis. how science shows that god does not exist. American Journal of Psychology, 122(2), 272–278.Google Scholar
  26. Lagnado, M. (2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer—Competing interests on religious conviction or spirituality may be important. British Medical Journal, 324(7344), 1037–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, B. Y., & Newberg, A. B. (2005). Religion and health: A review and critical analysis. Zygon, 40(2), 443–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00674.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leibovici, L. (2001). Effects of remote, retroactive intercessory prayer on outcomes in patients with bloodstream infection: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 323(7327), 1450–1451. doi: 10.1136/BMJ.323.7327.1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leibovici, L. (2002). Letters. BMJ, 324, 1038–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lesniak, K. T. (2006). The effect of intercessory prayer on wound healing in nonhuman primates. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 12(6), 42–48.Google Scholar
  31. Maranise, A. M. J. (2013). Superstition and religious ritual: An examination of their effects and utilization in sport. Sport Psychologist, 27(1), 83–91.Google Scholar
  32. Marshall, J. C. (2003). Such stuff as dreams are made on: Mediator-directed therapy in sepsis. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2(5), 391–405. doi: 10.1038/nrd1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Masters, K. S., Spielmans, G. I., & Goodson, J. T. (2006). Are there demonstrable effects of distant intercessory prayer? A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 32(1), 21–26. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm3201_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mulkay, M., & Gilbert, G. N. (1982). Joking apart: Some recommendations concerning the analysis of scientific culture. Social Studies of Science, 12(4), 585–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nordstrom, C. (2006). Re: “exposure to loud noise and risk of acoustic neuroma”. American Journal of Epidemiology, 164(7), 706. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Osmun, W. E., & Naugler, C. (1998). The impact of hissy fits in primary care. The Canadian Medical Association Journal, 159(12), 1457–1459.Google Scholar
  37. Palmer, R. F., Katerndahl, D., & Morgan-Kidd, J. (2004). A randomized trial of the effects of remote intercessory prayer: Interactions with personal beliefs on problem-specific outcomes and functional status. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 10(3), 438–448. doi: 10.1089/1075553041323803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paul, D. (2000). In Citing Chaos A Study of the Rhetorical Use of Citations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14(2), 185–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paul, G. (2008). The remote prayer delusion: Clinical trials that attempt to detect supernatural intervention are as futile as they are unethical. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(9), e18. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prayer. (2014). New World Encyclopedia. Accessed April 21, 2014. http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Prayer#cite_ref-7
  41. Price, C. I. (2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer—All randomised controlled trials require informed consent. British Medical Journal, 324(7344), 1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Radin, D., Stone, J., Levine, E., Eskandarnejad, S., Schlitz, M., Kozak, L., & Hayssen, G. (2008). Compassionate intention as a therapeutic intervention by partners of cancer patients: Effects of distant intention on the patients’ autonomic nervous system. Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing, 4(4), 235–243. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2008.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rahtu, T. (2011). Irony and (in)coherence: Interpreting irony using reader responses to texts. Text & Talk, 31(3), 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Redman, B. K., Yarandi, H. N., & Merz, J. F. (2008). Empirical developments in retraction. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(11), 807–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roberts, L., Ahmed, I., Hall, S., & Davison, A. (2009). Intercessory prayer for the alleviation of ill health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000368.pub3.Google Scholar
  46. Roggla, G., & Fortunat, S. (2003). Is there enough rationale in randomised controlled trials on distant healing? Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 115(15–16), 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schwartz, S. A. (2010a). Nonlocality and exceptional experiences: A study of genius, religious epiphany, and the psychic. Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing, 6(4), 227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2010.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwartz, S. A. (2010b). Trends that will affect your future … the denier movements critique evolution, climate change, and nonlocal consciousness. Explore-the Journal of Science and Healing, 6(3), 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. London, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Secor, M., & Walsh, L. (2004). A rhetorical perspective on the sokal hoax: Genre, style, and context. Written Communication, 21(1), 69–91. doi: 10.1177/0741088303261037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sharma, V., & Minhas, R. (2012). Explanatory models are needed to integrate RCT and observational data with the patient’s unique biology. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 105(1), 11–24. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, G., & Pell, J. (2003). Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. British Medical Journal, 327(7429), 1459–1461. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7429.1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steen, R. G. (2011). Retractions in the medical literature: How many patients are put at risk by flawed research? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(11), 688–692.Google Scholar
  54. Steinman, K. J., & Bambakidis, A. (2008). Faith-health collaboration in the united states: Results from a nationally representative study. American Journal of Health Promotion, 22(4), 256–263. doi: 10.4278/061212152R.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stewart, W. C., Adams, M. P., Stewart, J. A., & Nelson, L. A. (2013). Review of clinical medicine and religious practice. Journal of Religion and Health, 52(1), 91–106. doi: 10.1007/s10943-012-9578-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomsen, M., & Resnik, D. (1995). The effectiveness of the erratum in avoiding error propagation in physics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(3), 231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thornett, A. M. (2002). Effect of retroactive intercessory prayer—Cautious approach is needed. British Medical Journal, 324(7344), 1037. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7344.1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tonelli, M. R. (2012). Compellingness: Assessing the practical relevance of clinical research results. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(5), 962–967. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01901.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Trilla, A., Aymerich, M., Lacy, A. M., & Bertran, M. J. (2006). Phenotypic differences between male physicians, surgeons, and film stars: Comparative study. BMJ, 333(7582), 1291–1293. doi: 10.1136/BMJ.39015.672373.80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turner, D. D. (2006). Just another drug? A philosophical assessment of randomised controlled studies on intercessory prayer. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(8), 487–490. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vasconcelos, A. F. (2010). The effects of prayer on organizational life: A phenomenological study. Journal of Management and Organization, 16(3), 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Verhoef, H. (2002). Divine intervention. Lancet, 360(9349), 1990. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11906-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wager, E., & Williams, P. (2011). Why and how do journals retract articles? an analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 567–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wander, P. C. (1976). The Rhetoric of Science. Western Speech Communication, 40(4), 226–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Watson, N. J., & Nesti, M. (2005). The role of spirituality in sport psychology consulting: An analysis and integrative review of literature. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 17(3), 228–239. doi: 10.1080/10413200591010102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wimsatt, W. K., & Beardsley, M. C. (1946). The Intentional Fallacy. Sewanee Review, 54, 468–488.Google Scholar
  67. Winston. (2012). This ‘Christian doctor’ was lucky not to be struck off. The Guardian, June 18, 2012, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2012/jun/18/christian-doctor-lucky-not-struck-off
  68. Witcombe, B., & Meyer, D. (2006). Sword swallowing and its side effects. British Medical Journal, 333(7582), 1285–1287. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39027.676690.55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Woolgar, S. (1983). Irony in the social study of science. In K. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives in the social study of science (pp. 239–266). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Worrall, J. (2011). Causality in medicine: Getting back to the hill top. Preventive Medicine, 53(4–5), 235–238. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Youngster, I., Berkovitch, M., Kozer, E., Lazarovitch, Z., Berkovitch, S., & Goldman, M. (2009). Can religious icons be vectors of infectious diseases in hospital settings? American Journal of Infection Control, 37(10), 861–863. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Culture and CommunicationDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations