Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 1353–1366 | Cite as

Reporting Race and Ethnicity in Genetics Research: Do Journal Recommendations or Resources Matter?

  • Pamela Sankar
  • Mildred K. Cho
  • Keri MonahanEmail author
  • Kamila Nowak
Original Paper

Abstract

Appeals to scrutinize the use of race and ethnicity as variables in genetics research notwithstanding, these variables continue to be inadequately explained and inconsistently used in research publications. In previous research, we found that published genetic research fails to follow suggestions offered for addressing this problem, such as explaining the basis on which these labels are assigned to populations. This study, an analysis of genetic research articles using race or ethnicity terms, explores possible features of journals that are associated with improved reporting of race and ethnicity in genetic research. A journal’s expressed commitment to improving how race and ethnicity are used in genetic research, demonstrated by an editorial or in its instructions to authors, was the strongest predictor of following recommendations about reporting race and ethnicity. Journal impact factor had only a limited positive effect on attention to these issues, suggesting that editorial resources associated with higher impact factor journals are not sufficient to improve practices. Our findings reiterate that race and ethnicity variables are used inconsistently in genetic research, but also shed light on how journals might improve practices by highlighting the need for scientists to carefully scrutinize the use of these variables in their work.

Keywords

Race Ethnicity Genetics research Terminology Compliance Journals 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Public Health Service (R01-HG003191).

References

  1. Andreason, R. O. (2005). The meaning of “Race”: Folk conceptions and the new biology of race. Journal of Philosophy, 102, 94–106.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous. (1996). Style matters: Ethnicity, race, and culture: Guidelines for research, audit, and publication. British Medical Journal, 312, 1094.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous. (2000). Census, race, and science. Nature Genetics, 24, 97–98.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous. (2004) The unexamined ‘Caucasian’. Nature Genetics, 36(6), 541.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, T. (1997). “Racial” and ethnic classification: Two steps forward and one step back? Public Health Reports, 112, 477–480.Google Scholar
  6. Buchanan, C. C., Torstenson, E. S., Bush, W. S., Ritchie, M. D. (2012). A comparison of cataloged variation between International HapMap Consortium and 1000 Genomes Project data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19, 289–294.Google Scholar
  7. Burchard, E. G., Ziv, E., Coyle, N., Gomez, S. L., Tang, H., Karter, A. J., et al. (2003). The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(12), 1170–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper, R. S., Kaufman, J. S., & Ward, R. (2003). Race and genomics. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(12), 1166–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, M., Bruckman, D., Cabana, M., Clark, S., Dombkowski, K., Kemper, A., et al. (2001). Constructive use of race and ethnicity variables. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 155, 973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dutton, G., (2006) Correlating genomics, race, and medicine researchers strive to quantify racial role in disease risk & treatment. Genetic Engineering News, 26(1), 1–+.Google Scholar
  11. Ellison, G. T. H., Smart, A., Tutton, R., Outram, S. M., Ashcroft, R., & Martin, P. (2007). Racial categories in medicine: A failure of evidence-based practice? Public Library of Science Medicine, 4, 1434–1436.Google Scholar
  12. Gambaro, G., Anglani, F., & D’Angelo, A. (2000). Association studies of genetic polymorphisms and complex disease. The Lancet, 355, 308–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodman, A. H. (1998). The race pit. Anthropology Newsletter, 39, 50–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton, J. A. (2008). Revitalizing difference in the HapMap: Race and contemporary human genetic variation research. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 36(3), 471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haney-Lopez, I. F. (1994). The social construction of race: Some observations on illusion, fabrication, and choice. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 29(1), 1–62. 66–67, 11–17.Google Scholar
  16. Havranek, E. P., & Masoudi, F. A. (2004). What we’re talking about when we talk about race. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 43, 436–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2003). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. Retrieved April 19, 2004, www.icmje.org.
  18. International HapMap Project. (2005). Guidelines for referring to the HapMap populations in publications and presentations. http://www.hapmap.org/citinghapmap.html.
  19. Ioannadis, J., Ntzani, E., & Trikalinos, T. (2004). ‘Racial’ differences in genetic effects for complex diseases. Nature Genetics, 36, 1312–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jenkins, G., Merz, J., & Sankar, P. (2005). A qualitative study of women’s views on medical confidentiality. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 499–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaplan, J., & Bennett, T. (2003). Use of race and ethnicity in biomedical publications. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289, 2709–2716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koenig, B. A., Lee, S. S. J., & Richardson, S. (2008). Revisiting race in a genomic age. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, S. S., Mountain, J., Koenig, B., Altman, R., Brown, M., Camarillo, A., et al. (2008). The ethics of characterizing difference: Guiding principles on using racial categories in human genetics. Genome Biology, 9, 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muhr, T. (2004). User’s manual for ATLAS.ti. Berlin: Scientific Software Development GmbH.Google Scholar
  25. Mukamal, K., Conigrave, K., Mittleman, M., Camargo, C, Jr., Stampfer, M., Willett, W., et al. (2003). Roles of drinking pattern and type of alcohol consumed in coronary heart disease in men. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mykytyn, K., Nishimura, D., Searby, C., Beck, G., Bugge, K., Haines, H., et al. (2003). Evaluation of complex inheritance involving the most common Bardet-Biedl syndrome locus (BBS1). American Journal of Human Genetics, 72, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nebert, D. W., & Menon, A. (2001). Pharmacogenomics, ethnicity, and susceptibility genes. The Pharmacogenomics Journal, 1(1), 19–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Osborne, N. G., & Feit, M. D. (1992). The use of race in medical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phimister, E. G. (2003). Medicine and the racial divide. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 1081–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rivara, F., & Finberg, L. (2001). Use of the terms race and ethnicity. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 155, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sankar, P. (2003). Medline definitions of race and ethnicity and their application to genetic research. Nature Genetics, 34(2), 119.Google Scholar
  32. Sankar, P. (2013). Genomics research and race: Refining claims about essentialism. In J. Hartigan (Ed.), Anthropology of Race Genes, Biology, and Culture, (pp. 107-124). SAR Press: Santa Fe, NM.Google Scholar
  33. Sankar, P., Cho, M. K., & Mountain, J. L. (2007). Race and ethnicity in genetic research. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 9(143A), 961–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smart, A., Tutton, R., Ashcroft, R., Martin, P. A., & Ellison, G. T. H. (2006). Can science alone improve the measurement and communication of race and ethnicity in genetic research? Exploring the strategies proposed by nature genetics. BioSocieties, 1, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sondik, E., Lucas, J., Madans, J., & Smith, S. (2000). Race/ethnicity and the 2000 census: Implications for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1709–1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomson ISI. (2005a). Journal citation reports. Retrieved July 1, 2005, www.isinet.com.
  37. Thomson ISI. (2005b). The impact factor. Retrieved July 25, 2005, www.isinet.com/essays/journalcitationreports/7.html.
  38. Van der Weyden, M. (2007). The ICMJE and URM: Providing independent advice for the conduct of biomedical research and publication. In A. Singh & S. Singh (Eds.), The academia-industry symposium MSM 2007: Medical practice and pharmaceutical industry. And ever the duo shall meet: MSM, 5, 15–24.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, J. F., Weale, M. E., Smith, A. C., Gratix, F., Fletcher, F., Thomas, M. G., et al. (2001). Population genetic structure of variable drug response. Nature Genetics, 29, 265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Winker, M. (2004). Measuring race and ethnicity: Why and how? Journal of the American Medical Association, 292, 1612–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela Sankar
    • 1
  • Mildred K. Cho
    • 2
  • Keri Monahan
    • 3
    Email author
  • Kamila Nowak
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Medical Ethics and Health PolicyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Stanford Center for Biomedical EthicsStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Department of Medical Ethics and Health PolicyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Jefferson Medical CollegePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations