Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 825–828 | Cite as

The Principles of Fair Allocation of Peer-Review: How Much Should a Researcher be Expected to Contribute?

  • José G. B. DerraikEmail author
Commentary

Abstract

There seems to be reluctance amongst scientists to invest some of their own time in the peer-review of manuscripts. As a result, journal editors often struggle to secure reviewers for a given manuscript in a timely manner. Here, two simple principles are proposed, which could fairly allocate the contribution of individual researchers to the peer-review process.

Keywords

Peer-review Science Guidelines Research 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Dr Benjamin Albert (Liggins Institute, University of Auckland) for his very insightful comments and peer-review of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The author has no financial conflicts of interest to disclose, except that he is in the editorial board of a scientific journal.

References

  1. Beall J. (2014). List of Predatory Publishers 2014 [Online]. Available: http://scholarlyoa.com/2014/01/02/list-of-predatory-publishers-2014/.
  2. Kubke F. (2012). What I learned as an Academic Editor for PLoS One [Online]. Available: http://blogs.plos.org/mindthebrain/2012/10/17/what-i-learned-as-an-academic-editor-for-plos-one/.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Liggins InstituteUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations