Researcher Perspectives on Conflicts of Interest: A Qualitative Analysis of Views from Academia
The increasing interconnectedness of academic research and external industry has left research vulnerable to conflicts of interest. These conflicts have the potential to undermine the integrity of scientific research as well as to threaten public trust in scientific findings. The present effort sought to identify themes in the perspectives of faculty researchers regarding conflicts of interest. Think-aloud interview responses were qualitatively analyzed in an effort to provide insights with regard to appropriate ways to address the threat of conflicts of interest in research. Themes in participant responses included disclosure of conflicts of interest, self-removal from situations where conflict exists, accommodation of conflict, denial of the existence of conflict, and recognition of complexity of situations involving conflicts of interest. Moral disengagement operations are suggested to explain the appearance of each identified theme. In addition, suggestions for best practices regarding addressing conflicts of interest given these themes in faculty perspectives are provided.
KeywordsBias Conflicts of interest Ethical decision making Moral disengagement
- Deer, B. (2011). How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed. BMJ (British Medical Journal), 342. Retrieved from http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c5347#xref-ref-7-1.
- Godlee, F., Smith, J., & Marcovitch, H. (2011). Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. BMJ (British Medical Journal), 342. Retrieved from http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c7452#ref-9.
- Krimsky, S. (2005). The funding effect in science and its implications for the judiciary. The Journal of Law, Economics & Policy, 13, 43–68.Google Scholar
- The New York Times. (2013). Aftermath of an unfounded vaccine scare. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/23/opinion/the-aftermath-of-measles-vaccine-scare-in-britain.html?ref=andrewwakefield&_r=0.