Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 707–765 | Cite as

A Review of Contemporary Work on the Ethics of Ambient Assisted Living Technologies for People with Dementia

  • Peter NovitzkyEmail author
  • Alan F. Smeaton
  • Cynthia Chen
  • Kate Irving
  • Tim Jacquemard
  • Fiachra O’Brolcháin
  • Dónal O’Mathúna
  • Bert Gordijn
Review Paper


Ambient assisted living (AAL) technologies can provide assistance and support to persons with dementia. They might allow them the possibility of living at home for longer whilst maintaining their comfort and security as well as offering a way towards reducing the huge economic and personal costs forecast as the incidence of dementia increases worldwide over coming decades. However, the development, introduction and use of AAL technologies also trigger serious ethical issues. This paper is a systematic literature review of the on-going scholarly debate about these issues. More specifically, we look at the ethical issues involved in research and development, clinical experimentation, and clinical application of AAL technologies for people with dementia and related stakeholders. In the discussion we focus on: (1) the value of the goals of AAL technologies, (2) the special vulnerability of persons with dementia in their private homes, (3) the complex question of informed consent for the usage of AAL technologies.


Dementia Ethics Ambient assisted living Ambient intelligence Ambient technology Informed consent 



This research has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement 288199—Dem@Care.


  1. Aarts, E., Markopoulos, P., & Ruyter, B. (2007). The persuasiveness of ambient intelligence. In M. Petković & W. Jonker (Eds.), Security, privacy, and trust in modern data management (pp. 367–381). Berlin: Springer.
  2. Abascal, J., & Azevedo, L. (2007). Fundamentals of inclusive HCI design. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal access in human computer interaction. Coping with diversity (pp. 3–9). Berlin: Springer.
  3. Abascal, J., & Nicolle, C. (2005). Moving towards inclusive design guidelines for socially and ethically aware HCI. Interacting with Computers, 17, 484–505. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  4. Ahonen, P., Alahuhta, P., Daskala, B., Delaitre, S., Hert, P. D., Lindner, R., Maghiros, I., Moscibroda, A., Schreurs, W., & Verlinden, M. (2010). Safeguards. In D. Wright, M. Friedewald, Y. Punie, S. Gutwirth & E. Vildjiounaite (Eds.), Safeguards in a world of ambient intelligence (pp. 179–251). Berlin: Springer.
  5. Allen, M., Leung, R., McGrenere, J., & Purves, B. (2008). Involving domain experts in assistive technology research. Universal Access in the Information Society, 7, 145–154. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  6. Appleyard, R. (2005). Disability informatics. In D. Lewis, G. Eysenbach, R. Kukafka, P. Z. Stavri & H.B. Jimison (Eds.), Consumer health informatics (pp. 129–142). New York: Springer.
  7. Árnason, V., Li, H., & Cong, Y. (2011). Informed consent. In R. Chadwick, H. ten Have & E. M. Meslin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of health care ethics (pp. 106–116). Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  8. Astell, A., Alm, N., Gowans, G., Ellis, M., Dye, R., & Vaughan, P. (2009). Involving older people with dementia and their carers in designing computer based support systems: Some methodological considerations. Universal Access in the Information Society, 8, 49–58. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  9. Batchelor, R., Bobrowicz, A., Mackenzie, R., & Milne, A. (2012). Challenges of ethical and legal responsibilities when technologies’ uses and users change: Social networking sites, decision-making capacity and dementia. Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 99–108. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  10. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Belbachir, A. N., Lunden, T., Hanák, P., Markus, F., Böttcher, M., & Mannersola, T. (2010). Biologically-inspired stereo vision for elderly safety at home. Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, 127, 216–222. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  12. Bermingham, A., O’Rourke, J., Gurrin, C., Collins, R., Irving, K., & Smeaton, A. F. (2013). Automatically recommending multimedia content for use in group reminiscence therapy. In 1st ACM MM workshop on multimedia indexing and information retrieval for healthcare—MIIRH’13, 22 October 2013, Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  13. Beyleveld, D. (2011). Privacy, confidentiality and data protection. In R. Chadwick, H. ten Have & E. M. Meslin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of health care ethics (pp. 95–105). Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  14. Borenstein, J., & Pearson, Y. (2010). Robot caregivers: Harbingers of expanded freedom for all? Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 277–288. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  15. Broek, G., Cavallo, F., & Wehrmann, C. (2010). AALIANCE ambient assisted living roadmap. IOS Press: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, S., Hine, N., Sixsmith, A., & Garner, P. (2004). Care in the community. BT Technology Journal, 22, 56–64. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  17. Brown, S., Hine, N., Sixsmith, A., & Garner, P. (2006). Care in the community. In A. Steventon & S. Wright (Eds.), Intelligent spaces (pp. 65–80). London: Springer.
  18. Burleson, W., Newman, N., & Brotman, R. (2012). Empowering independent living for people with autism: Designing supportive, low-cost, interactive E-health environments. In M. Bang & E. L. Ragnemalm (Eds.), Persuasive technology. Design for health and safety (pp. 13-30). Berlin: Springer.
  19. Cahill, S., Macijauskiene, J., Nygard, A.-M., Faulkner, J.-P., & Hagen, I. (2007). Technology in dementia care. Technology and Disability, 19(2), 55–60.
  20. Camarinha-Matos, L., & Afsarmanesh, H. (2011). Collaborative ecosystems in ageing support. In L. M. Camarinha-Matos, A. Pereira-Klen & H. Afsarmanesh (Eds.), Adaptation and value creating collaborative networks (pp. 177-188). Boston: Springer.
  21. Cavoukian, A., Fisher, A., Killen, S., & Hoffman, D. (2010). Remote home health care technologies: How to ensure privacy? Build it in: Privacy by design. Identity in the Information Society, 3, 363–378. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  22. Chan, M., Campo, E., Estève, D., & Fourniols, J.-Y. (2009). Smart homes—Current features and future perspectives. Maturitas, 64, 90–97. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  23. Chan, M., Estève, D., Escriba, C., & Campo, E. (2008). A review of smart homes-present state and future challenges. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 91, 55–81. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  24. Coeckelbergh, M. (2010). Health care, capabilities, and AI assistive technologies. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 13, 181–190.
  25. Coeckelbergh, M. (2012). “How I learned to love the robot”: Capabilities, information technologies, and elderly care. In I. Oosterlaken, J. Hoven, D. E. Goldberg, E. Selinger & I. Poel (Eds.), The capability approach, technology and design (pp. 77–86). Berlin: Springer.
  26. Conley, E., Owens, D., Luzio, S., Subramanian, M., Ali, A., Hardisty, A., & Rana, O. (2008). Simultaneous trend analysis for evaluating outcomes in patient-centred health monitoring services. Health Care Management Science, 11, 152–166. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  27. Cook, D. J., Augusto, J. C., & Jakkula, V. R. (2009). Ambient intelligence: Technologies, applications, and opportunities. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 5, 277–298. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  28. Daniel, K. M., Cason, C. L., & Ferrell, S. (2009). Emerging technologies to enhance the safety of older people in their homes. Geriatric Nursing, 30, 384–389. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  29. Darwish, A., & Hassanien, A. E. (2011). Wearable and implantable wireless sensor network solutions for healthcare monitoring. Sensors, 11, 5561–5595. Accessed March 19, 2012.
  30. Darzentas, J., & Miesenberger, K. (2005). Design for all in information technology: A universal concern. In K. Andersen, J. Debenham & R. Wagner (Eds.), Database and expert systems applications (pp. 406–420). Berlin: Springer.
  31. Decker, M. (2012). Service robots in the mirror of reflective research. Poiesis & Praxis, 9, 181–200. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  32. Decker, M., Dillmann, R., Dreier, T., Fischer, M., Gutmann, M., Ott, I., & Spiecker genannt Döhmann, I. (2011). Service robotics: Do you know your new companion? Framing an interdisciplinary technology assessment. Poiesis & Praxis, 8, 25–44. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  33. Dekkers, W. (2009). On the notion of home and the goals of palliative care. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 30, 335–349. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  34. Dishman, E., & Carrillo, M. C. (2007). Perspective on everyday technologies for Alzheimer’s care: Research findings, directions, and challenges. Alzheimer’s and Dementia, 3, 227–234. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  35. Doorn, N. (2010). A procedural approach to distributing responsibilities in R&D networks. Poiesis & Praxis, 7, 169–188. March 19, 2012.
  36. Duquenoy, P. (2004). Intelligent ethics. In R. Jacquart (Ed.), Building the information society (pp. 597–602). Dordrecht: Springer.
  37. Duquenoy, P., & Whitehouse, D. (2006). A 21st century ethical debate: Pursuing perspectives on ambient intelligence. In C. Zielinski, P. Duquenoy & K. Kimppa (Eds.), Information society: Emerging landscapes (pp. 293–314). New York: Springer.
  38. Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., & Grady, C. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(20), 2701–2711.
  39. Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., Killen, J., & Grady, C. (2004). What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 189, 930–937.
  40. Eurostat. (2011). Population projections. European Commission. Retrieved from
  41. Fairclough, S. H. (2009). Fundamentals of physiological computing. Interacting with Computers, 21, 133–145. Accessed March 19, 2012.
  42. Foddy, B. (2012). The right and wrong of growing old: Assessing the argument from evolution. Philosophy & Technology, 1–14. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  43. Francis, P., Balbo, S., & Firth, L. (2009). Towards co-design with users who have autism spectrum disorders. Universal Access in the Information Society, 8, 123–135. Accessed March 19, 2012.
  44. Friedewald, M., & Raabe, O. (2011). Ubiquitous computing: An overview of technology impacts. Telematics and Informatics, 28, 55–65. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  45. Gaul, S., & Ziefle, M. (2009). Smart home technologies: Insights into generation-specific acceptance motives. In A. Holzinger & K. Miesenberger (Eds.), HCI and usability for e-inclusion (pp. 312-332). Berlin: Springer.
  46. Grönvall, E., & Kyng, M. (2012). On participatory design of home-based healthcare. Cognition, Technology & Work. Accessed April 10, 2013.
  47. Harrefors, C., Sävenstedt, S., Lindquist, A., Lindquist, B., & Axelsson, K. (2012). Professional caregivers’ perception on how persons with mild dementia might experience the usage of a digital photo diary. The Open Nursing Journal, 6, 20–29.
  48. Hersh, M., Johnson, M., Andersson, C., Campbell, D., Farquharson, A., Furner, S., et al. (2003). 9. In M. Hersh & M. Johnson (Eds.), The final product: Issues in the design and distribution of assistive technology devices (pp. 297–305). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  49. Hofmann, B. (2012). Ethical challenges with welfare technology: A review of the literature. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–18. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  50. Holzinger, A., Schaupp, K., & Eder-Halbedl, W. (2008). An investigation on acceptance of ubiquitous devices for the elderly in a geriatric hospital environment: Using the example of person tracking. In K. Miesenberger, J. Klaus, W. Zagler & A. Karshmer (Eds.), Computers helping people with special needs (pp. 22–29). Berlin: Springer.
  51. Kang, H. G., Mahoney, D. F., Hoenig, H., Hirth, V. A., Bonato, P., Hajjar, I., et al. (2010). In situ monitoring of health in older adults: Technologies and issues. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 58, 1579–1586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kaye, J. (2010). Technology and dementia: The way ahead. In M. D. Mulvenna & C. D. Nugent (Eds.), Supporting people with dementia using pervasive health technologies (pp. 221–234). London: Springer.
  53. Kleinberger, T., Becker, M., Ras, E., Holzinger, A., & Müller, P. (2007). Ambient intelligence in assisted living: Enable elderly people to handle future interfaces. In Universal access in human–computer interaction. Ambient interaction (pp. 103–112). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Kosta, E., Pitkanen, O., Niemela, M., & Kaasinen, E. (2008). Ethical-legal challenges in user-centric ami services. In 2008 3rd international conference on internet and web applications and services (ICIW 2008), New York, 2008 (pp. 19–24). IEEE.Google Scholar
  55. Kosta, E., Pitkänen, O., Niemelä, M., & Kaasinen, E. (2010). Mobile-centric ambient intelligence in health- and homecare-anticipating ethical and legal challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16, 303–323. Accessed March 19, 2012.
  56. Kumar, P., & Lee, H.-J. (2011). Security issues in healthcare applications using wireless medical sensor networks: A survey. Sensors, 12, 55–91. Accessed March 19, 2012.
  57. Landau, R., & Werner, S. (2012). Ethical aspects of using GPS for tracking people with dementia: Recommendations for practice. International Psychogeriatrics, 24, 358–366.
  58. Lauriks, S., Reinersmann, A., Roest, H. G., Meiland, F., Davies, R., Moelaert, F., Mulvenna, M. D., Nugent, C. D., & Dröes, R.-M. (2010). Review of ICT-based services for identified unmet needs in people with dementia. In M. D. Mulvenna & C. D. Nugent (Eds.), Supporting people with dementia using pervasive health technologies (pp. 37–61). London: Springer.
  59. Lauriks, S., Reinersmann, A., Van der Roest, H. G., Meiland, F. J. M., Davies, R. J., Moelaert, F., Mulvenna, M. D., Nugent, C. D., & Dröes, R. M. (2007). Review of ICT-based services for identified unmet needs in people with dementia. Ageing Research Reviews, 6, 223–246. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  60. Lorenzen-Huber, L., Boutain, M., Camp, L., Shankar, K., & Connelly, K. (2011). Privacy, technology, and aging: A proposed framework. Ageing International, 36, 232–252. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  61. Lynch, S. M., Brown, J. S., & Taylor, M. G. (2009). Demography of disability. In P. Uhlenberg (Ed.), International handbook of population aging (pp. 567–582). Dordrecht: Springer.
  62. Maguire, M., Nicolle, C., Marshall, R., Sims, R., Lawton, C., Peace, S., & Percival, J. (2011). A study of user needs for the `Techno Kitchen’. In HCI international 2011—Posters’ extended abstracts (pp. 66–71). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Maier, E., & Kempter, G. (2009). AAL in the wild—Lessons learned. In Universal access in human–computer interaction. intelligent and ubiquitous interaction environments (pp. 218-227). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  64. Mandell, A. M., & Green, R. C. (2011). Alzheimer’s disease. In The handbook of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias (pp. 3–92). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  65. Martin, S., Bengtsson, J. E., & Dröes, R.-M. (2010). Assistive technologies and issues relating to privacy, ethics and security. In M. D. Mulvenna & C. D. Nugent (Eds.), Supporting people with dementia using pervasive health technologies (pp. 63–76). London: Springer.
  66. McHugh, J., Newman, E., Smeaton, A. F., & Irving, K. (2012). Dem@Care: A proposed system for the home-based ambient monitoring and enablement of older adults with dementia. (Poster) In Irish Gerontological Society Conference, 14–15 September 2012, Cork, Ireland.
  67. McLean, A. (2011). Ethical frontiers of ICT and older users: Cultural, pragmatic and ethical issues. Ethics and Information Technology, 13, 313–326. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  68. Mepham, B. (2008). Bioethics—An introduction for the biosciences (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Merilahti, J., Pärkkä, J., & Korhonen, I. (2012). Estimating older people’s physical functioning with automated health monitoring technologies at home: Feature correlations and multivariate analysis. In M. Rautiainen, T. Korhonen, E. Mutafungwa, E. Ovaska, A. Katasonov, A. Evesti, H. Ailisto, A. Quigley, J. Häkkilä, N. Milic-Frayling & J. Riekki (Eds.), Grid and pervasive computing workshops (pp. 94–104). Berlin: Springer Berlin.
  70. Mordini, E., Wright, D., Wadhwa, K., Hert, P., Mantovani, E., Thestrup, J., Steendam, G., D’Amico, A., & Vater, I. (2009). Senior citizens and the ethics of e-inclusion. Ethics and Information Technology, 11, 203–220. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  71. Newell, A., Gregor, P., Morgan, M., Pullin, G., & Macaulay, C. (2011). User-sensitive inclusive design. Universal Access in the Information Society, 10, 235–243. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  72. Niemelä, M., Gonzalez Fuentetaja, R., Kaasinen, E., & Lorenzo Gallardo, J. (2007). Supporting independent living of the elderly with mobile-centric ambient intelligence: User evaluation of three scenarios. In B. Schiele, A. Dey, H. Gellersen, B. de Ruyter, M. Tscheligi, R. Wichert, E. Aarts & A. Buchmann (Eds.), Ambient intelligence (pp. 91–107). Berlin: Springer.
  73. Noury, N., Poujaud, J., Fleury, A., Nocua, R., Haddidi, T., & Rumeau, P. (2011). Smart sweet home… a pervasive environment for sensing our daily activity? In Activity recognition in pervasive intelligent environments (pp. 187–208). Amsterdam: Atlantis Press.Google Scholar
  74. O’Neill, S. A., Mason, S., Parente, G., Donnelly, M. P., Nugent, C. D., McClean, S., Scotney, B., & Craig, D. (2011a). Video reminders as cognitive prosthetics for people with dementia. Ageing International, 36, 267–282. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  75. O’Neill, S. A., Parente, G., Donnelly, M. P., Nugent, C. D., Beattie, M. P., McClean, S. I., Scotney, B. W., Mason, S. C., & Craig, D. (2011b). Assessing task compliance following mobile phone-based video reminders. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, 2011 annual international conference of the IEEE, 5295–5298.
  76. Oberzaucher, J., Werner, K., Mairböck, H. P., Beck, C., Panek, P., Hlauschek, W., & Zagler, W. L. (2009). A videophone prototype system evaluated by elderly users in the living lab schwechat. In HCI and usability for e-inclusion (pp. 345-352). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  77. Oost, E., & Reed, D. (2011). Towards a sociological understanding of robots as companions. In M. H. Lamers & F. J. Verbeek (Eds.), Human–robot personal relationships (pp. 11–18). Berlin: Springer.
  78. Oppenauer, C., Preschl, B., Kalteis, K., & Kryspin-Exner, I. (2007). Technology in old age from a psychological point of view. In A. Holzinger (Ed.), HCI and usability for medicine and health care (pp. 133–142). Berlin: Springer.
  79. Palm, E. (2012). A declaration of healthy dependence: The case of home care. Health Care Analysis, 1–20. Accessed April 10, 2013.
  80. Panek, P., & Zagler, W. L. (2008). A living lab for ambient assisted living in the municipality of Schwechat. In K. Miesenberger, J. Klaus, W. Zagler & A. Karshmer (Eds.), Computers helping people with special needs (pp. 1008–1015). Berlin: Springer.
  81. Piasek, P., Irving, K., & Smeaton, A. F. (2013). Case study in SenseCam use as an intervention technology for early-stage dementia. International Journal of Computers in Health Care, 1(4), 304–319.
  82. Picking, R., Robinet, A., McGinn, J., Grout, V., Casas, R., & Blasco, R. (2012). The Easyline+ project: Evaluation of a user interface developed to enhance independent living of elderly and disabled people. Universal Access in the Information Society, 11, 99–112. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  83. Plaza, I., Martin, L., Martin, S., & Medrano, C. (2011). Mobile applications in an aging society: Status and trends. Journal of Systems and Software, 84, 1977–1988. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  84. Portet, F., Vacher, M., Golanski, C., Roux, C., & Meillon, B. (2011). Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: Acceptability and objection aspects. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 127–144. Accessed March 19, 2012.
  85. Pulli, P., Hyry, J., Pouke, M., & Yamamoto, G. (2012). User interaction in smart ambient environment targeted for senior citizen. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 1–8. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  86. Rapoport, M. (2012). Being a body or having one: Automated domestic technologies and corporeality. AI & Society, 28, 209–218. Accessed March 19, 2012.
  87. Remmers, H. (2010). Environments for ageing, assistive technology and self-determination: Ethical perspectives. Informatics for Health & Social Care, 35, 200–210.
  88. Robinson, L., Brittain, K., Lindsay, S., Jackson, D., & Olivier, P. (2009). Keeping In Touch Everyday (KITE) project: Developing assistive technologies with people with dementia and their carers to promote independence. International Psychogeriatrics, 21, 494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Robinson, L., Hutchings, D., Corner, L., Finch, T., Hughes, J., Brittain, K., & Bond, J. (2007). Balancing rights and risks: Conflicting perspectives in the management of wandering in dementia. Health Risk & Society, 9, 389–406.
  90. Román, I., Calvillo, J., & Roa, L. M. (2009). Personalizing care: Integration of hospital and homecare. In K. Yogesan, L. Bos, P. Brett & M. C. Gibbons (Eds.), Handbook of digital homecare (pp. 33–52). Berlin: Springer.
  91. Romdhane, R., Mulin, E., Derreumeaux, A., Zouba, N., Piano, J., Lee, L., Leroi, I., Mallea, P., David, R., Thonnat, M., Bremond, F., & Robert, P. (2012). Automatic video monitoring system for assessment of Alzheimer’s disease symptoms. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 16, 213–218. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  92. Salces, F., Baskett, M., Llewellyn-Jones, D., & England, D. (2006). Ambient interfaces for elderly people at home. In Ambient intelligence in everyday life (pp. 256–284). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  93. Satava, R. M. (2003). Biomedical, ethical, and moral issues being forced by advanced medical technologies. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 147(3), 246–258.
  94. SBJ. (2011). Statistical handbook of Japan 2011. Statistics Bureau and the Director-General for Policy Planning of Japan.
  95. Scanaill, C., Carew, S., Barralon, P., Noury, N., Lyons, D., & Lyons, G. (2006). A review of approaches to mobility telemonitoring of the elderly in their living environment. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 34, 547–563. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  96. Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012). Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 27–40. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  97. Sixsmith, A., & Sixsmith, J. (2008). Ageing in place in the United Kingdom. Ageing International, 32, 219–235. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  98. Sorell, T., & Draper, H. (2012). Telecare, surveillance, and the welfare state. American Journal of Bioethics, 12, 36–44.
  99. Sparrow, R., & Sparrow, L. (2006). In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds and Machines, 16, 141–161. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  100. Spiekermann, S., & Pallas, F. (2006). Technology paternalism—Wider implications of ubiquitous computing. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science, 4, 6–18. Accessed March 19, 2012.
  101. Sponselee, A.-M., Schouten, B., Bouwhuis, D., & Willems, C. (2008). Smart home technology for the elderly: Perceptions of multidisciplinary stakeholders. In M. Mühlhäuser, A. Ferscha & E. Aitenbichler (Eds.), Constructing ambient intelligence (pp. 314–326). Berlin: Springer.
  102. Stapleton, L. (2008). Ethical decision making in technology development: A case study of participation in a large-scale information systems development project. AI & Society, 22, 405–429. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  103. Stip, E., & Rialle, V. (2005). Environmental cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: Ethical implications of “smart home” technology. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie, 50, 281–291.
  104. Toboso, M. (2011). Rethinking disability in Amartya Sen’s approach: ICT and equality of opportunity. Ethics and Information Technology, 13, 107–118. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  105. UN. (2006). World population prospects: The 2006 revision. United Nations.
  106. Vallor, S. (2011). Carebots and caregivers: Sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the twenty-first century. Philosophy & Technology, 24, 251–268. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  107. van Hoof, J., Kort, H. S. M., Rutten, P. G. S., & Duijnstee, M. S. H. (2011). Ageing-in-place with the use of ambient intelligence technology: Perspectives of older users. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80, 310–331. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  108. van Wynsberghe, A. (2012). Designing robots for care: Care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1-27. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  109. Viswanathan, H., Chen, B., & Pompili, D. (2012). Research challenges in computation, communication, and context awareness for ubiquitous healthcare. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 50, 92–99.
  110. Wallace, J., Mulvenna, M. D., Martin, S., Stephens, S., & Burns, W. (2010). ICT interface design for ageing people and people with dementia. In M. D. Mulvenna & C. D. Nugent (Eds.), Supporting people with dementia using pervasive health technologies (pp. 165–188). London: Springer.
  111. Walsh, K., & Callan, A. (2011). Perceptions, preferences, and acceptance of information and communication technologies in older-adult community care settings in Ireland: A case-study and ranked-care program analysis. Ageing International, 36, 102–122. Accessed April 11, 2013.
  112. Wherton, J. P., & Monk, A. F. (2008). Technological opportunities for supporting people with dementia who are living at home. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 571–586. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  113. Wright, D. (2011). A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Ethics and Information Technology, 13, 199–226. Accessed June 1, 2012.
  114. Wright, D., & Wadhwa, K. (2010). Mainstreaming the e-excluded in Europe: Strategies, good practices and some ethical issues. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 139–156. Accessed April 5, 2012.
  115. Zaad, L., & Ben Allouch, S. (2008). The influence of control on the acceptance of ambient intelligence by elderly people: An explorative study. In E. Aarts, J. L. Crowley, B. de Ruyter, H. Gerhäuser, A. Pflaum, J. Schmidt & R. Wichert (Eds.), Ambient Intelligence (pp. 58–74). Berlin: Springer.
  116. Zwijsen, S. A., Niemeijer, A. R., & Hertogh, C. M. P. M. (2010). Ethics of using assistive technology in the care for community-dwelling elderly people: An overview of the literature. Aging & Mental Health, 15(4), 419–427.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Novitzky
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Alan F. Smeaton
    • 2
  • Cynthia Chen
    • 4
  • Kate Irving
    • 3
  • Tim Jacquemard
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fiachra O’Brolcháin
    • 1
  • Dónal O’Mathúna
    • 3
  • Bert Gordijn
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of EthicsDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland
  2. 2.INSIGHT, School of ComputingDublin City UniversityGlasnevin, Dublin 9Ireland
  3. 3.School of Nursing and Human SciencesDublin City UniversityGlasnevin, Dublin 9Ireland
  4. 4.LondonUK

Personalised recommendations