Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 271–292 | Cite as

The Capacity for Ethical Decisions: The Relationship Between Working Memory and Ethical Decision Making

  • April Martin
  • Zhanna Bagdasarov
  • Shane Connelly
Original Paper

Abstract

Although various models of ethical decision making (EDM) have implicitly called upon constructs governed by working memory capacity (WMC), a study examining this relationship specifically has not been conducted. Using a sense making framework of EDM, we examined the relationship between WMC and various sensemaking processes contributing to EDM. Participants completed an online assessment comprised of a demographic survey, intelligence test, various EDM measures, and the Automated Operation Span task to determine WMC. Results indicated that WMC accounted for unique variance above and beyond ethics education, exposure to ethical issues, and intelligence in several sensemaking processes. Additionally, a marginally significant effect of WMC was also found with reference to EDM. Individual differences in WMC appear likely to play an important role in the ethical decision-making process, and future researchers may wish to consider their potential influences.

Keywords

Ethical decision-making Working memory capacity Sensemaking AOSPAN Individual differences 

References

  1. Angie, A. D., Connelly, S., Waples, E. P., & Kligyte, V. (2011). The influence of discrete emotions on judgment and decision-making: A meta-analytic review. Cognition and Emotion, 25(8), 1393–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., et al. (2007). Personality and ethical decision-making in research: The role of perceptions of self and others. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2, 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. Spence & J. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple component model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14(6), 575–589. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80045-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L. N., Johnson, J. F., Thiel, C. E., MacDougall, A. E., Devenport, L. D., et al. (2012). An investigation of case-based instructional strategies on learning, retention, and ethical decision-making. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(4), 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bagdasarov, Z., Thiel, C. E., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L., Devenport, L. D., et al. (2013). Case-based ethics instruction: The influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1305–1322. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9414-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bagozzi, R. P., Dholakia, U. M., & Basuroy, S. (2003). How effortful decisions get enacted: The motivating role of decision processes, desires, and anticipated emotions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(4), 273–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bagozzi, R. P., & Pieters, R. (1998). Goal-directed emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 12(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Becker, J. T., & Morris, R. G. (1999). Working memory(s). Brain and Cognition, 41, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99(2), 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caughron, J. J., Antes, A. L., Beeler, C. K., Thiel, C. E., Wang, X., & Mumford, M. D. (2011). Sensemaking strategies for ethical decision making. Ethics and Behavior, 21, 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christianson, S. A. (Ed.). (1992). The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. E. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 8, 331–335.Google Scholar
  17. Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183.Google Scholar
  18. Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 354–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(12), 547–552. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cowan, N. (1997). Attention and memory. An integrated framework (Oxford Psychology Series 26). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 1–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dougherty, M., Thomas, R., & Lange, N. (2010). Toward an integrative theory of hypothesis generation, probability judgment, and hypothesis testing. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 52, 299–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ford, R. C., & Richardson, W. D. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaudine, A., & Thorne, L. (2001). Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grimsley, G., Ruch, F. L., Warren, N. P., & Ford, J. S. (1985). Manual for the employee attitude survey, test of verbal reasoning. Glendale, CA: Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  28. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harkrider, L. N., MacDougall, A. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J. F., Thiel, C. E., Mumford, M. D., et al. (2013). Structuring case-based ethics trainings: How comparing cases and structured prompts influence training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 23(3), 179–198. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2013.774865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harkrider, L. N., Thiel, C. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Mumford, M. D., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., et al. (2012). Improving case-based ethics training with codes of conduct and forecasting content. Ethics and Behavior, 22, 258–280. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2012.661311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ilkowska, M., & Engle, R. (2010). Trait and state differences in working memory capacity. In A. Gruszka, G. Matthews, & B. Szymura (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (pp. 295–320). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1210-7_18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson, J. F., Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L. N., MacDougall, A., Connelly, S., Devenport, L. D., et al. (2013). The effects of note-taking and review processes on sensemaking and ethical decision making. Ethics and Behavior, 23(4), 299–323. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2013.774275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnson, J. F., Thiel, C. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L., Devenport, L. D., et al. (2012). Case-based ethics education: The impact of cause complexity and outcome favorability on ethicality. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(3), 63–77. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Effect of negative emotional content on working memory and long-term memory. Emotion, 3(4), 378–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2006). Amygdala activity is associated with the successful encoding of item, but not source, information for positive and negative stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 2564–2570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kligyte, V., Connelly, S., Thiel, C. E., & Devenport, L. D. (2013). The influence of anger, fear, and emotion regulation strategies on ethical decision-making. Human Performance, 26(4), 297–326. doi: 10.1080/08959285.2013.814655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stages in the development of moral thought and action. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  39. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development: Vol. 1. The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  40. Linnenbrink, E. A., Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of goals and affect in working memory functioning. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(2), 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mikels, J. A., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Beyer, J. A., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2008). Emotion and working memory: Evidence for domain-specific processes for affective maintenance. Emotion, 8(2), 256–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. doi: 10.1037/h0043158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., et al. (2008). Sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 18, 315–339. doi: 10.1080/10508420802487815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mumford, M. D., Devenport, L. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, M. S., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., et al. (2006). Validation of ethical decision-making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics and Behavior, 16(4), 319–345. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1604_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nairne, J. S. (2002). Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peacock, J., Harkrider, L. N., Bagdasarov, Z., Connelly, S., Johnson, J. F., Thiel, C. E., et al. (2013). Effects of alternative outcome scenarios and structured outcome evaluation on case-based ethics instruction. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1283–1303. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9402-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal-directed behaviours: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
  50. Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1997). Forward and backward serial recall. Intelligence, 25, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruch, F. L., & Ruch, W. W. (1980). Employee aptitude survey. Los Angeles, CA: Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  52. Schmeichel, B. J. (2007). Attention control, memory updating, and emotion regulation temporarily reduce the capacity for executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schmeichel, B. J., Volokhov, R. N., & Demaree, H. A. (2008). Working memory capacity and the self-regulation of emotional expression and experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1526–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schneider, W., & Chein, J. M. (2003). Controlled and automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science, 27, 525–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 4, 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stenmark, C., Antes, A. L., Wang, X., Caughron, J., Thiel, C. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Strategies in forecasting outcomes in ethical decision-making: Identifying and analyzing the causes of the problem. Ethics and Behavior, 20, 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., & Griffith, J. A. (2011). The influence of anger on ethical decision making: Comparison of a primary and secondary appraisal. Ethics and Behavior, 21(5), 380–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L., Devenport, L. D., Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J. F., et al. (2013). Case-based knowledge and ethics education: Improving learning and transfer through emotionally rich cases. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 265–286. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9318-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomas, R. P., Dougherty, M. R., Sprenger, A. M., & Harbison, J. I. (2008). Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment. Psychological Review, 115, 155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.Google Scholar
  62. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Werhane, P. H. (2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Woehr, D. J., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1994). Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Woiceshyn, J. (2011). A model for ethical decision making in business: Reasoning, intuition, and rational moral principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 311–323. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0910-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • April Martin
    • 1
  • Zhanna Bagdasarov
    • 1
  • Shane Connelly
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations