Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 717–733 | Cite as

Social Media in Disaster Risk Reduction and Crisis Management

Original Paper


This paper reviews the actual and potential use of social media in emergency, disaster and crisis situations. This is a field that has generated intense interest. It is characterised by a burgeoning but small and very recent literature. In the emergencies field, social media (blogs, messaging, sites such as Facebook, wikis and so on) are used in seven different ways: listening to public debate, monitoring situations, extending emergency response and management, crowd-sourcing and collaborative development, creating social cohesion, furthering causes (including charitable donation) and enhancing research. Appreciation of the positive side of social media is balanced by their potential for negative developments, such as disseminating rumours, undermining authority and promoting terrorist acts. This leads to an examination of the ethics of social media usage in crisis situations. Despite some clearly identifiable risks, for example regarding the violation of privacy, it appears that public consensus on ethics will tend to override unscrupulous attempts to subvert the media. Moreover, social media are a robust means of exposing corruption and malpractice. In synthesis, the widespread adoption and use of social media by members of the public throughout the world heralds a new age in which it is imperative that emergency managers adapt their working practices to the challenge and potential of this development. At the same time, they must heed the ethical warnings and ensure that social media are not abused or misused when crises and emergencies occur.


Social media Disasters Emergency management Ethics Twitter Facebook 


  1. Alexander, D. E. (2008). Emergency command systems and major earthquake disasters. Journal of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, 10(3), 109–118.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, D. E. (in press [a]). Celebrity culture, entertainment values … and disaster. In G. Bankoff et al. (eds) Cultures and disasters: Understanding cultural frameworks in disaster risk reduction (forthcoming). Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, D. E. (in press [b]). Communicating earthquake risk to the public: The trial of the “L’Aquila Seven”. Natural Hazards.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, C. L., & McAdams, M. J. (2009). Blogs of information: How gender cues and individual motivations influence perceptions of credibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 435–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balana, C. D. (2012). Social media: Major tool in disaster response. Inquirer Technology, 15 June 2012, 5 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Barr, P. (2011). Staying connected. Social media put to work when disaster strikes. Modern Healthcare, 41(36), 33.Google Scholar
  7. Barton, A. H. (1970). Communities in disaster: A sociological analysis of collective stress situations. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  8. Bird, D., Ling, M., & Haynes, K. (2012). Flooding Facebook: The use of social media during the Queensland and Victorian floods. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 27(1), 27–33.Google Scholar
  9. Blanchard, H., Carvin, A., Whittaker, M. E., Fitzgerald, M., Harman, W., & Humphrey, B. (2010). The case for integrating crisis response with social media. White Paper. Washington, DC: American Red Cross.Google Scholar
  10. Boggs, B. C., & Edwards, M. L. (2010). Does what happens on Facebook stay on Facebook? Discovery, admissibility, ethics, and social media. Illinois Bar Journal, 98(7), 1–4.Google Scholar
  11. Brafman, O., & Beckstrom, R. A. (2006). The starfish and the spider: The unstoppable power of leaderless organizations. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011). Information credibility on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, 28 March-1 April 2011. Hydrerabad, India, International World Wide Web Conference Committee, pp 675–684.Google Scholar
  13. Cavanagh, C. J. (2012). Kony 2012 and the political economy of conflict representation. Nordic Africa Institute, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, 7 pp. Accessed August 26, 2013.
  14. Cheong, M., & Lee, V. C. S. (2010). Twitmographics: Learning the emergent properties of the Twitter community. In N. Memon & R. Alhajj (Eds.), From sociology to computing in social networks: Theory, foundations and applications (pp. 323–342). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheong, M., & Lee, V. C. S. (2011). A microblogging-based approach to terrorism informatics: Exploration and chronicling civilian sentiment and response to terrorism events via Twitter. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(1), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chung, I. J. (2011). Social amplification of risk in the Internet environment. Risk Analysis, 31(12), 1883–1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2010). Who interacts on the Web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Comupters in Human Behaviour, 26(2), 247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crawford, K. (2009). Following you: Disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 23(4), 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crowe, A. (2012). Disasters 2.0: The application of social media systems for modern emergency management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. CSS-ETH. (2013). Using ICT and social media in disasters: Opportunities & risks for governmentBackground document. 3RD Special Report. Zürich: Centre for Security Studies, ETH.Google Scholar
  21. Dearing, J. W., & Kazmierczak, J. (1993). Making iconoclasts credible: The Iben browning earthquake prediction. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 11(3), 391–403.Google Scholar
  22. Decamp, M. (2013). Physicians, social media, and conflict of interest. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(2), 299–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Denis-Remis, C., Lebraty, J.-F., & Philippe, H. (2013). The 2008 anti-French demonstrations in China: Learning from a social media crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 21(1), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dufty, N. (2012). Using social media to build community disaster resilience. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 27(1), 40–45.Google Scholar
  25. Eysenbach, G. (2008). Medicine 2.0: Social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3), e22, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2007). The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviours on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media and Society, 9(2), 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fritz, C. E. (1961). Disaster. In R. K. Merton & R. A. Nisbet (Eds.), Contemporary social problems (pp. 651–694). New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  28. Gao, H., Barbier, G., & Goolsby, R. (2011a). Harnessing the crowdsourcing power of social media for disaster relief. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 26(3), 10–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gao, H., Wang, X., Barbier, G., & Liu, H. (2011b). Promoting coordination for disaster relief: From crowdsourcing to coordination. In J. Salerno, S. J. Yang, D. Nau & S.-K. Chai (Eds.), Social computing, behavioural-cultural modelling, and prediction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6589 (pp. 197–204). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Goolsby, R. (2009). Lifting elephants: Twitter and blogging in global perspective. In J. Salerno, S. J. Yang, D. Nau & S.-K. Chai (Eds.), Social computing, behavioural-cultural modelling, and prediction. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6589 (pp. 2–7). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Goolsby, R. (2010). Social media as crisis platform: The future of community maps/crisis maps. Association for Computing Machinery Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 1(1), Article No. 7, 1–11.Google Scholar
  32. Grodzinsky, F. S., & Tavani, H. T. (2010). Applying the “contextual integrity” model of privacy to personal blogs in the blogosphere. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics, 3, 38–47.Google Scholar
  33. Hammon, L., & Hippner, H. (2012). Crowdsourcing. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 4(3), 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Helsloot, I., & Ruitenberg, A. (2004). Citizen response to disasters: A survey of literature and some practical implications. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 12(3), 98–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hjorth, L., & Kim, K.-H. Y. (2011). The mourning after: A case study of social media in the 3.11 earthquake disaster in Japan. Television and New Media, 12(6), 552–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hughes, A. L., & Palen, L. (2009). Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events. International Journal of Emergency Management, 6(3–4), 248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hughes, A. L., & Palen, L. (2012). The evolving role of the public information officer: An examination of social media in emergency management. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 9(1), Article 22.Google Scholar
  38. Jennex, M. (2012a). Managing crises and disasters with emerging technologies: Advancements. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jennex, M. E. (2012b). Social media-viable for crisis response? Experience from the great San Diego/Southwest blackout. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 4(2), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson, H., Lavesson, N., Zhao, H., & Wu, S. F. (2011). On the concept of trust in online social networks. In L. Salgarelli, G. Bianchi, & N. Blefari-Melazzi (Eds.), Trustworthy internet (pp. 143–157). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krimsky, S. (2007). Risk communication in the internet age: The rise of disorganized skepticism. Environmental Hazards, 7(2), 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lindsay, B. R. (2011). Social media and disasters: Current uses, future options, and policy considerations. CRS Report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  43. Lobb, A., Mock, N., & Hutchinson, P. L. (2012). Traditional and social media coverage and charitable giving following the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 27(4), 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mayer, J. (1969). Famine in Biafra. Post-Graduate Medicine, 45, 236–240.Google Scholar
  45. McKee, R. (2013). Ethical issues in using social media for health and health care research. Health Policy (early view).Google Scholar
  46. Müller, T. R. (2013). ‘The Ethiopian famine’ revisited: Band Aid and the antipolitics of celebrity humanitarian action. Disasters, 37(1), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Murthy, D. (2011a). New media and natural disasters: Blogs and the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. Information, Communication and Society, 1, 1–17.Google Scholar
  48. Murthy, D. (2011b). Twitter: Microphone for the masses? Media, Culture and Society, 33(5), 779–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 119–157.Google Scholar
  50. Palen, L., & Liu, S. B. (2007). Citizen communications in crisis: Anticipating a future of ICT-supported public participation. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2007 Proceedings: Emergency Action 28 April-3 May 2007, San Jose, California, pp. 728–736.Google Scholar
  51. Plotnick, L., White, C., & Plummer, M. (2009). The design of an online social network for emergency management: A one stop shop. In Proceedings of the 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco, California 69 August 2009, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  52. Quarantelli, E. L. (1989). The social science study of disasters and mass communication. In L. Walters, L. Wilkins, & T. Walters (Eds.), Bad tidings: Communication and catastrophe (pp. 1–19). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  53. Quarantelli, E. L. (1997). Problematical aspects of the information/communication revolution for disaster planning and research: Ten non-technical issues and questions. Disaster Prevention and Management, 6(2), 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Resch, B., Crowley, D. N., Breslin, J. G., Sohn, G., Burtner, R., Pike, W. A., et al. (2011). Crowdsourcing, citizen sensing and sensor web technologies for public and environmental health surveillance and crisis management: Trends, OGC standards and application examples. International Journal of Health Geographics, 10(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reuter, C., Marx, A., & Pipek, V. (2012). Crisis Management 2.0: Towards a systematization of social software use in crisis situations. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 4(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Singer, E., & Endreny, P. M. (1994). Reporting on risk: How the mass media portray accidents, diseases, disasters and other hazards. Risk: Health, Safety and Environment, 5(3), 261–270.Google Scholar
  57. Song, X., & Yan, X. (2012). Influencing factors of emergency information spreading in online social networks: A simulation approach. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 9(1), Article 30.Google Scholar
  58. Stirratt, A. A. (2011). Social media use in March 2011 Japanese crisis: Impact on emergency preparedness advocacy. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana: Master of Public Health Dissertation.Google Scholar
  59. Sutton, J., Palen, L., & Shklovski, I. (2008). Backchannels on the front lines: Emergent uses of social media in the 2007 southern California wildfires. In F. Fiedrich & B. Van de Walle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International ISCRAM Conference, Washington, DC, May 2008, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  60. Sykes, T. F., & Travis, E. A. (2012). Social media and disasters: Uses, options, considerations. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Taylor, M., Wells, G., Howell, G., & Raphael, B. (2012). A Facebook study from ‘Cyclone Yasi Update’: The role of social media as psychological first aid as a support to community resilience building. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 27(1), 20–26.Google Scholar
  62. Taylor, J. B., Zurcher, L. A., & Key, W. H. (1970). Tornado: A community responds to disaster. Seattle, Washington: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  63. Vieweg, S., Hughes, A. L., Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2010). Microblogging during two natural hazards events: What Twitter may contribute to situational awareness. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2010 Prodeedings: Crisis Informatics. 1015 April 2010, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 1079–1088.Google Scholar
  64. Vihalemm, T., Kiisel, M., & Harro-Loit, H. (2012). Citizens’ response patterns to warning messages. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 20(1), 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Westbrook, R., Karlgaard, T., White, C., & Knapic, J. (2012). A holistic approach to evaluating social media’s successful implementation into emergency management operations: Applied research in an action research study. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 4(3), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. White, C., & Plotnik, L. (2010). A framework to identify best practices: Social media and Web 2.0 technologies in the emergency domain. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 2(1), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yates, D., & Paquette, S. (2011). Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Risk and Disaster ReductionUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations