Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 379–409 | Cite as

Challenges and Opportunities of Lifelog Technologies: A Literature Review and Critical Analysis

  • Tim Jacquemard
  • Peter Novitzky
  • Fiachra O’Brolcháin
  • Alan F. Smeaton
  • Bert Gordijn
Review Paper

Abstract

In a lifelog, data from various sources are combined to form a record from which one can retrieve information about oneself and the environment in which one is situated. It could be considered similar to an automated biography. Lifelog technology is still at an early stage of development. However, the history of lifelogs so far shows a clear academic, corporate and governmental interest. Therefore, a thorough inquiry into the ethical aspects of lifelogs could prove beneficial to the responsible development of this field. This article maps the main ethically relevant challenges and opportunities associated with the further development of lifelog technologies as discussed in the scholarly literature. By identifying challenges and opportunities in the current debate, we were able to identify other challenges and opportunities left unmentioned. Some of these challenges are partly explained by a blind spot in the current debate. Whilst the current debate focuses mainly on lifelogs held by individuals, lifelogs held by governmental institutions and corporations pose idiosyncratic ethical concerns as well. We have provided a brief taxonomy of lifelog technology to show the variety in uses for lifelogs. In addition, we provided a general approach to alleviate the ethical challenges identified in the critical analysis.

Keywords

Lifelog Sousveillance Surveillance Pervasive computing Identity Information communication technology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was partly supported by the Science Foundation Ireland under grant 07/CE/I1147.

References

  1. Aarts, E., & Marzano, S. (2003). The new everyday: Views on ambient intelligence. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allan, A., & Warden, P. (2011). Got an iPhone or 3G iPad? Apple is recording your moves. O’Reilly Radar. Available from: http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/04/apple-location-tracking.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2013.
  3. Allen, A. L. (2007). Dredging up the past: Lifelogging, memory, and surveillance. The University of Chicago Law Review, 75(1), 47–74.Google Scholar
  4. ANP. (2009). Minister: excuus aan slachtoffer identiteitsfraude. Nrc.nl. Available from: http://vorige.nrc.nl/binnenland/article2368828.ece/Minister_excuus_aan_slachtoffer_identiteitsfraude. Accessed 08 Jan 2013.
  5. Bailey, J., & Kerr, I. R. (2007). Seizing Control? The experience capture experiments of Ringley & Mann. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(2), 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bannon, L. (2006). Forgetting as a feature not a bug. CoDesign, 2(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bannon, L. (2011). Reimagining HCI: Toward a more human-centered perspective. Interactions, 18(4), 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, G., & Gemmell, J. (2007). A Digital Life. Scientific American. Available from: http://www.scienceandsociety.org/web/Library_files/A.Digital.Life.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2012.
  9. Bell, G., & Gemmell, J. (2009). Total recall: How the E-Memory revolution will change anything. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  10. Brin, D. (1998). The transparent society: Will technology force us to choose between privacy and freedom?. Cambridge: Perseus Books Group.Google Scholar
  11. Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, 176(1), 101–108.Google Scholar
  12. Byrne, D., Kelly, L., & Jones, G. J. F. (2010). Multiple multimodal mobile devices: Lessons learned from engineering lifelog solutions. In P. Alencar & D. Cowan (Eds.), Handbook of research on mobile software engineering: Design, implementation and emergent applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, B. X. (2011). Creepy bug gives some iPhones unwanted facetime. Wired.com. Available from: http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2011/04/creepy-iphone-bug/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29. Accessed 23 May 2012.
  14. Chen, Y., & Jones, G. J. F. (2012). What do people want from their lifelogs? In 6th Irish human computer interaction conference.Google Scholar
  15. Cheng, W. C., Golubchik, L., & Kay, D. G. (2004). Total recall: are privacy changes inevitable? In Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on continuous archival and retrieval of personal experiences, pp. 86–92.Google Scholar
  16. Clowes, R. W. (2012). Hybrid memory, cognitive technology and self. In The proceedings of the AISB and IACAP world congress 2012. Google Scholar
  17. Clowes, R. W. (2013). The cognitive integration of E-Memory. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(1), 107–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Curry, M. R. (2007). Being there then: Ubiquitous computing and the anxiety of reference. International Review of Information Ethics, 8(8), 13–19.Google Scholar
  19. DARPA. (2003). ‘Terrorism information awareness’ (TIA) program formerly known as ‘total information awareness’. Available from: http://www.iwar.org.uk/news-archive/tia/total-information-awareness.htm. Accessed 30 Jan 2012.
  20. DARPA. Advanced soldier sensor information systems and technology (ASSIST). Available from: http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/I2O/Programs/Advanced_Soldier_Sensor_Information_Systems_and_Technology_(ASSIST).aspx. Accessed 30 Jan 2012.
  21. DARPA/IPTO. (2003). BAA # 03-30 LifeLog proposer information pamphlet. Available from:http://realnews247.com/lifelog.htm. Accessed 30 Jan 2012.
  22. Del Giudice, K., & Gardner, M. (2009). The message of the pensieve: Realizing memories through the world wide web and virtual reality. Available from: http://web.mit.edu/comm-forum/mit6/papers/Delgiudice.pdf (unpublished).
  23. Diaz, J. (2008). Huge iPhone security flaw puts all private information at risk. Gizmodo. Available from: http://gizmodo.com/5042332/huge-security-iphone-flaw-puts-all-private-information-at-risk. Accessed 30 Jan 2012.
  24. Dib, L. (2008). Memory as concept in the design of digital recording devices. Altérités, 5(1), 38–53.Google Scholar
  25. Dib, L. (2012). The forgetting dis-ease: Making time matter. A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 23(3), 43–73.Google Scholar
  26. Dodge, M. (2007). Do we need an ethics of forgetting in a world of digital ‘memories for life’? In Position paper for designing for forgetting and exclusion conference. Google Scholar
  27. Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2005). The ethics of forgetting in an age of pervasive computing. CASA Working Papers 92. London: Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis.Google Scholar
  28. Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2007). Outlines of a world coming into existence’: Pervasive computing and the ethics of forgetting. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design, 34(3), 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fernandez, K. C., Levinson, C. A., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2012). Profiling: Predicting Social Anxiety From Facebook Profiles. Social Psychological and Personality Science.Google Scholar
  30. Fleming, N. (2013). I’m recording everything for the first living archive. NewScientist.com. Available from: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21829110.300-im-recording-everything-for-the-first-living-archive.html. Accessed 10 April 2013.
  31. Goggin, G. (2005). “Have fun and change the world”: Moblogging, mobile phone culture and the internet. Blogtalk. Available from: http://incsub.org/blogtalk/?page_id=119. Accessed on 01 Feb 2012.
  32. Golbeck, J., Robles C., & Turner K. (2011). Predicting personality with social media. In Conference on human factors in computing systemsProceedings, pp. 253–262.Google Scholar
  33. Hall, L., Johansson, P., & de Léon, D. (2013). Recomposing the Will: Distributed motivation and computer mediated extrospection. In: T. Vierkant, A. Clark, & J. Kiverstein, (Eds.) Decomposing the will, Philosophy of Mind Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Heersmink, R., Den Hoven, J., Van Eck, N. J., & Den Berg, J. (2011). Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Helfert, M., Walshe, R., & Gurrin, C. (2013). The impact of information quality on quality of life: An information quality oriented framework. IEICE Transactions, 96-B(2), 404–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jayaram, M. (2011). The business of privacy: from private anxiety to commercial sense? A broad overview of why privacy ought to matter to Indian businesses. NUJS Law Review, 4(4), 567–594.Google Scholar
  37. Kang, J., Shilton, K., Estrin, D., Burke, J. A., & Hansen, M. (2011). Self-surveillance privacy (pp. 1–43). UC Los Angeles: UCLA School of Law.Google Scholar
  38. Kelly, P., Marshall, S. J., Badland, H., Kerr, J., Oliver, M., Doherty, A. R., et al. (2013). An ethical framework for automated, wearable cameras in health behavior research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44(3), 314–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koops, E. J. (2011). Forgetting footprints, shunning shadows: A critical analysis of the ‘right to be forgotten’ in big data practice. SCRIPTED, 8(3), 229–256.Google Scholar
  40. Lemos, A. (2011). Locative media and surveillance at the boundaries of informational territories. In R. Firmino, F. Duarte, & C. Ultramari (Eds.), ICTs for mobile and ubiquitous urban infrastructures: Surveillance, locative media and global networks (pp. 129–149). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.Google Scholar
  41. Mann, S. (2002). Sousveillance. Wearcam.org. Available from: http://wearcam.org/sousveillance.htm. Accessed 05 April 2012.
  42. Mann, S. (2004a). “Sousveillance” inverse surveillance in multimedia imaging. In MULTIMEDIA ‘04 Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on multimedia, pp. 620–627.Google Scholar
  43. Mann, S. (2004b). Continuous lifelong capture of personal experience with EyeTap. In Proceedings of the the 1st ACM workshop on continuous archival and retrieval of personal experiences. New York, NY: ACM SIGMM.Google Scholar
  44. Mann, S. (2005a). Sousveillance and cyborglogs. A 30-year empirical voyage through ethical, legal and policy issues. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 14(6), 625–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mann, S. (2005b). Equiveillance: The equilibrium between Sur-veillance and Sous-veillance.Google Scholar
  46. Mann, S., Fung, J., & Lo, R. (2006). Cyborglogging with camera phones: Steps toward equiveillance. In Proceedings of the ACM multimedia 2006.Google Scholar
  47. Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2009). Delete: The virtue of forgetting in the digital Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 13(4), 357–364Google Scholar
  49. Memoto AB. (2013). Memoto automatic lifelogging camera. Available from: http://memoto.com/. Accessed 15 Jan 2013.
  50. Microsoft. (2011). Microsoft research sensecam. Available from: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/cambridge/projects/sensecam/. Accessed 30 Jan 2012.
  51. Moreno, J. (2004). DARPA on your mind. Cerebrum, 6(4), 92–100.Google Scholar
  52. Murata, K. (2011). The right to forget/be forgotten. In: CEPE 2011: Crossing Boundaries.Google Scholar
  53. Nack, F. (2005). You must remember this. IEEE Multimedia, 12(1), 4–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Hara, K. (2010a). Narcissus to a man: Lifelogging, technology and the normativity of truth. In E. Berry et al. (Eds.) Second Annual SenseCam symposium. Available at: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/21904/.
  55. O’Hara, K., & Hall, W. (2008). Trust on the Web: Some Web Science Research Challenges.Google Scholar
  56. O’Hara, K. (2010b). Arius in cyberspace: Digital companions and the limits of the person. In Y. Wilks (Ed.), Close engagements with artificial companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  57. O’Hara, Kieron. (2012). The technology of collective memory and the normativity of truth. In D. Goldberg, N. McCarthy, & D. Michelfelder (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  58. O’Hara, K., Morris, R., Shadbolt, N., Hitch, G. J., Hall, W., & Beagrie, N. (2006). Memories for Life: A review of the science and technology. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 3(8), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. O’Hara, K., Tuffield, M., & Shadbolt, N. (2009). Lifelogging: Privacy and empowerment with memories for life. Identity in the Information Society, 1(2), 2–3.Google Scholar
  60. Price, B. A. (2010a). Towards privacy preserving lifelogging. In Proceedings of the second annual SenseCam symposium.Google Scholar
  61. Price, B. A. (2010b). Challenges in eliciting privacy and usability requirements for lifelogging. In Conference’10.Google Scholar
  62. Rawassizadeh, R. (2011). Towards sharing life-log information with society. Behaviour & Information Technology, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  63. Rawassizadeh, R., & Min Tjoa, A. (2010). Securing shareable life-logs. In The second IEEE international conference on information privacy, security, risk and trust. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5590506.
  64. Schacter, D. L. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Boston & New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  65. Schlenoff, C., Weiss, B., & Potts Steves, M. (2011). Lessons learned in evaluating DARPA advanced military technologies. Tech Beat. Available from: http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=906654. Accessed 30 Jan 2012.
  66. Sellen, A. J., & Whittaker, S. (2010). Beyond total capture: A constructive critique of lifelogging. Communications of the ACM, 53(5), 71–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shachtman, N. (2004). Pentagon revives memory project. Wired.com. Available from: http://www.wired.com/politics/security/news/2004/09/64911. Accessed 30 Jan 2012.
  68. Smith, A., O’Hara, K., & Lewis, P. (2011). Visualising the past: Annotating a life with linked open data. In Web science conference 2011, June 14th17th 2011, Koblenz Germany.Google Scholar
  69. Sonvilla-Weiss, S. (2008). (IN)VISIBLE: Learning to act in the metaverse. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  70. Sweeney, L. (2004). Navigating computer science research through waves of privacy concerns: Discussions among computer scientists at Carnegie Mellon University. ACM Computers and Society, 34(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. TED. (2011). Hasan Elahi: FBI, here I am!. Available from: http://www.ted.com/talks/hasan_elahi.html. Accessed 23 May 2012.
  72. Thurm, S., & Kane, I. Y. (2010). Your apps are watching you. The Wall Street Journal. Available from: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704694004576020083703574602.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_tech. Accessed 23 May 2012.
  73. Turkle, S. (2008). Inner History. In S. Turkle (Ed.), The inner history of devices. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  74. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  75. Valentino Devries, J. (2011). IPhone stored location in test even if disabled. The Wall Street Journal. Available from: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704123204576283580249161342.html?mod=WSJ_article_comments#articleTabs%3Dcomments. Accessed 23 May 2012.
  76. Van Den Eede, Y. (2011). Technological remembering/forgetting: A Faustian bargain? Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 2(2), 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. van Dijck, J. (2005). From shoebox to performative agent: The computer as personal memory machine. New Media & Society, 7(3), 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. van Dijck, J. (2012). Mediated memories in the digital age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Weber, K. (2010). Mobile Devices and a New Understanding of Presence. In: Workshop paper from SISSI2010 at the 12th annual ACM international conference on ubiquitous computing, p. 101.Google Scholar
  80. Werkhoven, P. (2005). Experience machines: capturing and retrieving personal content. In P. A. Bruck, A. Buchholz, Z. Karssen, & A. Zerfass (Eds.), E-content technologies and perspectives for the European Market. New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Jacquemard
    • 1
  • Peter Novitzky
    • 1
  • Fiachra O’Brolcháin
    • 1
  • Alan F. Smeaton
    • 2
  • Bert Gordijn
    • 3
  1. 1.CLARITY: Centre for Sensor Web Technologies / Institute of EthicsDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland
  2. 2.CLARITY: Centre for Sensor Web Technologies / School of ComputingDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland
  3. 3.Institute of EthicsDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland

Personalised recommendations