Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 197–220 | Cite as

Improving Epistemological Beliefs and Moral Judgment Through an STS-Based Science Ethics Education Program

  • Hyemin HanEmail author
  • Changwoo JeongEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This study develops a Science–Technology–Society (STS)-based science ethics education program for high school students majoring in or planning to major in science and engineering. Our education program includes the fields of philosophy, history, sociology and ethics of science and technology, and other STS-related theories. We expected our STS-based science ethics education program to promote students’ epistemological beliefs and moral judgment development. These psychological constructs are needed to properly solve complicated moral and social dilemmas in the fields of science and engineering. We applied this program to a group of Korean high school science students gifted in science and engineering. To measure the effects of this program, we used an essay-based qualitative measurement. The results indicate that there was significant development in both epistemological beliefs and moral judgment. In closing, we briefly discuss the need to develop epistemological beliefs and moral judgment using an STS-based science ethics education program.

Keywords

Science–Technology–Society (STS) Science ethics education Epistemological beliefs Moral judgment Moral development 

References

  1. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bebeau, M. J. (1994). Influencing the moral dimensions of dental practice. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 121–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self voice and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendixen, L. D., Schraw, G., & Dunkle, M. E. (1998). Epistemic beliefs and moral reasoning. The Journal of Psychology, 132, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bird, A. (1998). Philosophy of science. London: UCL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blatt, M., & Kohlberg, L. (1975). The effect of classroom moral discussion upon children’s level of moral judgment. Journal of Moral Education, 4, 129–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brownlee, J., Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2001). Changing epistemological beliefs in pre-service teacher education students. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experiment and quasi-experimental designs for research. Dallas, TX: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (1992). A Power primer. Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 112(1), 155–159.Google Scholar
  12. Colby, A., & Kohlberg, L. (1987). The measurement of moral judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., Lieberman, M., Fischer, K., & Saltzstein, H. D. (1983). A longitudinal study of moral judgment. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48, 1–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Craik, F. I. M., Moroz, T. M., Moscovitch, M., Stuss, D. T., Winocur, G., Tulving, E., et al. (1999). In search of the self: A positron emission tomography study. Psychological Science, 10(26), 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darrigol, O. (2007). For a history of knowledge. In K. Gavroglu & J. Renn (Eds.), Positioning the history of science (pp. 33–34). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  17. Doorn, N., & Kroesen, J. O. (2011). Using and developing role plays in teaching aimed at preparing for social responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9335-6.
  18. Duckett, L. J., & Ryden, M. B. (1994). Education for ethical nursing practice. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 51–69). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Elm, D. R., & Weber, J. (1994). Measuring moral judgment: The moral judgment interview or the defining issues test? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(5), 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic field notes (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gould, J. E. (2002). Concise handbook of experimental methods for the behavioral and biological sciences. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC.Google Scholar
  22. Greene, J. A., Torney-Purta, J., & Azevedo, R. (2010). Empirical evidence regarding relations among a model of epistemic and ontological cognition, academic performance, and educational level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 234–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grinnell, F. (2012). Research integrity and everyday practice of science. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9376-5.
  24. Han, H. (2006). A survey of effects of STS education on the university students’ moral development and epistemological beliefs: Using DIT and EBI. Journal of Ethics Education Studies, 9, 201–218.Google Scholar
  25. Han, H., & Jeong, W. (2009). Using STS theories and issues for moral education. Journal of Moral & Ethics Education, 29, 367–386.Google Scholar
  26. Herkert, J. R. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hofer, B. K. (2006). Beliefs about knowledge and knowing: Integrating domain specificity and domain generality: A response to Muis, Bendixen, and Haerle (2006). Educational Psychology Review, 18, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jeong, C. (2003). A cross-cultural study of the relationships between epistemological beliefs and moral judgment as a psychological foundation for moral education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Athens: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, S. C., Baxter, L. C., Wilder, L. S., Piper, J. G., Heiserman, J. E., & Prigatano, G. P. (2002). Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain, 125, 1808–1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelley, W. M., Macrae, C. N., Wyland, C. L., Caglar, S., Inati, S., & Heatherton, T. F. (2002). Finding the Self? An Event-Related fMRI Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(5), 785–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. King, P., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  35. Kirschenbaum, H. (2000). From values clarification to character education: A personal journey. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education & Development, 39(1), 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kitayama, S., & Tompson, S. (2010). Envisioning the future of cultural neuroscience. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klaczynsk, P. A. (2000). Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization: A two-process approach to adolescent cognition. Child Development, 71(5), 1347–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kohlberg, L. (1975). Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development revisited. In B. Baltes & W. Schaie (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Research and theory (pp. 179–204). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  40. Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  41. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lapsley, D. K. (1996). Moral psychology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  44. Latour, B. (2005). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Logino, H. (2011). The social dimensions of scientific knowledge. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved Sept 11, 2012, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/scientific-knowledge-social/.
  46. Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. May, D. R., & Luth, M. T. (2012). The effectiveness of ethics education: A quasi-experimental field study. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9349-0.
  48. Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain generality and domain specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ozaktas, H. M. (2011). Teaching science, technology, and society to engineering students: A sixteen year journey. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9329-4.
  50. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in college years. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rest, J. R. (1994). Background: Theory and research. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  53. Rest, J. R., Deemer, D., Barnett, R., Spickelmier, J., & Volker, J. (1986). Life experiences and developmental pathways. In J. R. Rest (Ed.), Moral development: Advances in research and theory (pp. 28–58). New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
  54. Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999). Postconventional moral thinking: A neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Rest, J. R., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S. J., & Bebeau, M. J. (2000). A neo-Kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education, 29, 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rich, J., & DeVittis, J. (1994). Theories of moral development (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.Google Scholar
  57. Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: Introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schommer-Aikins, M., & Hutter, R. (2002). Epistemological beliefs and thinking about everyday controversial issues. The Journal of Psychology, 136, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Scott, D., & Morrison, M. (2006). Key ideas in educational research. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
  60. Self, D. J., & Baldwin, D. C., Jr. (1994). Moral reasoning in medicine. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 147–162). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  61. Self, D. J., Olivarez, M., & Baldwin, D. C., Jr. (1994). Moral reasoning in veterinary medicine. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 163–171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  62. Sprigge, T. L. S. (1964). Definition of a moral judgment. Philosophy, 39(15), 301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Swanson, H. L., & Hill, G. (1993). Meta cognitive aspects of moral reasoning and behavior. Adolescence, 28(111), 711–735.Google Scholar
  64. Tsai, C. (1999). The progression toward constructivist epistemological views of science: A case study of the STS instruction of Taiwanese high school female students. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1201–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walker, L. J. (1988). The development of moral reasoning. Annals of Child Development, 5, 33–78.Google Scholar
  66. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. NeuroImage, 34, 1310–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stanford University School of EducationStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ethics EducationSeoul National UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations