Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 1229–1240 | Cite as

The Scientist’s Education and a Civic Conscience

Original Paper
  • 261 Downloads

Abstract

A civic science curriculum is advocated. We discuss practical mechanisms for (and highlight the possible benefits of) addressing the relationship between scientific knowledge and civic responsibility coextensively with rigorous scientific content. As a strategy, we suggest an in-course treatment of well known (and relevant) historical and contemporary controversies among scientists over science policy or the use of sciences. The scientific content of the course is used to understand the controversy and to inform the debate while allowing students to see the role of scientists in shaping public perceptions of science and the value of scientific inquiry, discoveries and technology in society. The examples of the activism of Linus Pauling, Alfred Nobel and Joseph Rotblat as scientists and engaged citizens are cited. We discuss the role of science professors in informing the social conscience of students and consider ways in which a treatment of the function of science in society may find, coherently, a meaningful space in a science curriculum at the college level. Strategies for helping students to recognize early the crucial contributions that science can make in informing public policy and global governance are discussed.

Keywords

Science education Curriculum Social responsibility 

References

  1. Beck, T. M., & Kauffman, G. B. (1994). Scientific methodology and ethics in university education. Journal of Chemical Education, 71, 922–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, G. I. (1998). The big bang: A history of explosives. Thrupp, Stroud, Gloucestershire: Sutton.Google Scholar
  3. Butcher, S. I. (2005). Origins of the Russell–Einstein Manifesto. Pugwash History Series, 1. http://www.pugwash.org/publication/phs/history9.pdf (accessed May 21, 2012).
  4. Chemistry and Policy. (2006). Chemistry and policy: A course intersection. http://serc.carleton.edu/sencer/chemistry_policy/index.html (accessed August 24, 2012).
  5. Coles, R. (1993). The call of service. Boston and New York: Hougton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  6. Coppola, B. P., & Smith, D. H. (1996). A case for ethics. Journal of Chemical Education, 73, 33–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davenport, D. A. (1996). Letters to F. J. Allen: An informal portrait of Linus Pauling. Journal of Chemical Education, 73, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, M. (1998). Thinking like an engineer. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Du Bois, W. E. B. (1989). The souls of black folk. New York: Bantam Classic (text reprinted from the 1953 Blue Heron edition). A copy is available at the University of Virginia (UVA) Library’s Electronic Text Center: http://etext.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/DubSoul.html (Chapter 5, p. 61.; accessed May 26, 2012).
  10. Epstein, M. S. (1998). Using bad science to teach good chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 75, 1399–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guardian. (2005) Sir Joseph Rotblat. The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2005/sep/02/obituaries.obituaries (accessed May 17, 2012).
  12. Hager, T. (1995). Force of nature: The life of Linus Pauling. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. Hager, T. (2008). The alchemy of air. New York: Harmony Books.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffmann, R. (2012). The material and spiritual rationales are inseparable. In J. Kovac & M. Weisberg (Eds.), Roald Hoffmann on the philosophy, art and science of chemistry (pp. 360–376). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kamb, B., & Pauling, L. C. (1959). The effects of strontium-90 on mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 45, 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kauffman, G. B., & Kauffman, L. M. (1996). An Interview with Linus Pauling. Journal of Chemical Education, 73, 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kovac, J. (1999). A weird insult from Norway: Linus Pauling as public intellectual. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 82(1–2), 91–106.Google Scholar
  18. Kovac, J. (2007). Moral rules, moral ideals and use-inspired research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kovac, J., & Coppola, B. P. (2000). Universities as moral communities. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 83(3–4), 765.Google Scholar
  20. Kovac, J., & Sherwood, D. W. (2001). Writing across the chemistry curriculum: An instructor’s handbook. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. McHale, J. L. (1994). Current events as subjects for term papers in an honors freshman chemistry class. Journal of Chemical Education, 71, 313–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Middlecamp, C. H., et al. (2006). Chemistry, society, and civic engagement (part 1): The SENCER project. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Newman, J. R. (1959). Four approaches to the problem of preventing a third world war. Scientific American, 200(2), 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nobel, A. (2012) http://www.nobelprize.org/alfred_nobel/will/will-full.html (accessed June 2, 2012).
  25. Nobel Prize. (2012) http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/ (accessed June 2, 2012).
  26. Oppenheimer, J. R. (1955). The open mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  27. Pauling, L. C. (1958). Genetic and somatic effects of carbon-14: This by-product of nuclear-weapon testing may do more genetic and somatic damage than has been supposed. Science, 128, 1183–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pontin, J. A., Aricó, E., Pitoscio Filho, J., Tiedemann, P. W., & Isuyama, F. G. C. (1993). Interactive chemistry teaching units developed with the help of the local chemical industry: Applying classroom principles to the real needs of local companies to help students develop skill in teamwork, communications, and problem solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 70, 223–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reiss, M. J. (1999). Teaching ethics in science. Studies in Science Education, 34, 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rotblat, J. (2002). Citizenship and science. Physics Education, 37(3), 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rotblat, J. (2005). The 50-year shadow. The New York Times. OP-Ed contribution, May 17, 2005. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/17/opinion/17Rotblat.html?_r=1 (accessed May 26, 2012).
  32. SENCER. (2012). SENCER: Science education for new civic engagements and responsibility. http://www.sencer.net/ (accessed August 26, 2012).
  33. Ståhle, N. K. (1962). Nobel, the man and his prize. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Gottwald Center for the SciencesUniversity of RichmondRichmondUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations