Teaching Engineering Ethics using BLOCKS Game
The aim of this study was to investigate the use of a newly developed design game called BLOCKS to stimulate awareness of ethical responsibilities amongst engineering students. The design game was played by seventeen teams of chemical engineering students, with each team having to arrange pieces of colored paper to produce two letters each. Before the end of the game, additional constraints were introduced to the teams such that they faced similar ambiguity in the technical facts that the engineers involved in the Challenger disaster had faced prior to the space shuttle launch. At this stage, the teams had to decide whether to continue with their original design or to develop alternative solutions. After the teams had made their decisions, a video of the Challenger explosion was shown followed by a post-game discussion. The students’ opinion on five Statements on ethics was tracked via a Five-Item Likert survey which was administered three times, before and after the ethical scenario was introduced, and after the video and post-game discussion. The results from this study indicated that the combination of the game and the real-life incident from the video had generally strengthened the students’ opinions of the Statements.
KeywordsEngineering ethics Design game Video Historical case-scenario
- ABET. (2009). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2010-11%20EAC%20Criteria%201-27-10.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2011.
- Bowyer, K. W. (2001). “Star Wars” revisited—a continuing case study in ethics and safety-critical software. 31th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, F1D-7.Google Scholar
- Bucciarelli, L. L. (1999). Design delta design: Seeing/seeing as. In Design thinking research symposium 4, Boston, pp. 23–25 April.Google Scholar
- Cannell, C. F., & Kahn, R. L. (1968). Interviewing. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 2: Research method. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Kroesen, O., & van der Zwaag, S. (2010). Teaching ethics to engineering students: From clean concepts to dirty tricks. In I. van de Poel & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering, philosophy of engineering and technology 2 (pp. 227–237). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lewis, S., van Hout, W., & Huang-Saad, A. (2010). 40th ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference.S3E−1.Google Scholar
- Pritchard, M. S. (1992). Teaching engineering ethics a case study approach. http://ethics.tamu.edu/pritchar/an-intro.htm. Accessed 3 August 2011.
- Schwarz, N., Hippler, H. J., & Noelle-Neumann, E. (1992). A cognitive model of response-order effects in survey measurement. In N. Schwarz, S. Sudman, & (Eds.), Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Smith, T. W. (2003). Developing comparable questions in cross-national surveys. In J. A. Harkness, F. J. R. Van de Vijver, & P. P. Mohler (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 69–92). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar