Positive Organizational Outcomes Associated with a Penchant for Openness
The tension between scientific openness versus secrecy has existed for centuries (Hull 1985). However, both academics and practitioners have recently argued that openness by private firms has many positive attributes. The purpose of this research effort is to review the extant literature on openness and to develop hypotheses regarding its impact on organizational outcomes. We then use a unique database to test the idea with 87 companies. Our findings are that openness is beneficial to the firm from a science, technological, and financial perspective and, perhaps, to the employees from an ethical viewpoint. The managerial and societal implications are also discussed.
KeywordsOpenness Technology Science
- Adams, J, & Clemmons, J. (2008). The NBER-Rensselaer scientific papers database: Form, nature, and function. NBER working paper 14575.Google Scholar
- Clozel, M. (2011). Between confidentiality and scientific exchange: The place of publication in drug discovery and pharmaceutical research. Science Translations Medicine, 3, 1–3.Google Scholar
- Gans, J., Murray, F. E. & Stern, S. (2011). Contracting over the disclosure of scientific knowledge: Intellectual property and academic publication. http://ssrn.com/abstract-1559871. Accessed 15 September 2012.
- Grilliches, Z. (1995). R&D and productivity: Econometric results and measurement issues, Technological Change. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Hall, B, Jaffe, A, & Trajtenberg, M. (2000) Market value and patent citations: A first look, NBER working paper 7741. Google Scholar
- Hawken, P. (1994). The ecology of commerce. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
- Jaffe, A. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence form firms’ patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984–999.Google Scholar
- Narin, F. (1999). Tech-line background paper, version of 19 August. Available on-line.Google Scholar
- Pulugurtha, S., & Sambhara, V. (2011). Pedestrian crash estimation models for signalized intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43, 439–446.Google Scholar
- Seymore, S. (2007). The “printed publication” bare after Klopfenstein: Has the Federal Circuit changed the way professors should talk about science? Akron Law Review, 40, 1–44.Google Scholar
- Thompson, S. P. (2006). Protect the tree, not just the orange: Strategic use of printed publications for intellectual property protection. Orange County Lawyer, 48, 22–30.Google Scholar