The Epistemic Integrity of Scientific Research
- First Online:
- 443 Downloads
We live in a world in which scientific expertise and its epistemic authority become more important. On the other hand, the financial interests in research, which could potentially corrupt science, are increasing. Due to these two tendencies, a concern for the integrity of scientific research becomes increasingly vital. This concern is, however, hollow if we do not have a clear account of research integrity. Therefore, it is important that we explicate this concept. Following Rudolf Carnap’s characterization of the task of explication, this means that we should develop a concept that is (1) similar to our common sense notion of research integrity, (2) exact, (3) fruitful, and (4) as simple as possible. Since existing concepts do not meet these four requirements, we develop a new concept in this article. We describe a concept of epistemic integrity that is based on the property of deceptiveness, and argue that this concept does meet Carnap’s four requirements of explication. To illustrate and support our claims we use several examples from scientific practice, mainly from biomedical research.
KeywordsEpistemic integrity Research integrity Scientific integrity Deception Biomedical research Explication
- Carnap, R. (1950). Logical foundation of probability. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Haack, S. (2007). The integrity of science: What it means, why it matters? In Conselho Nacional de Ética para as Ciências da Vida (Ed.), Ética e Investigação nas Ciências da Vida—Actas do 10° Seminário do CNECV (pp. 9–28). Lisbon: Presidência do Conselho de Ministros. http://www.as.miami.edu/phi/haack/PORTUGAL.pdf, accessed June 4, 2012.
- National Academy of Sciences. (1992). Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process (Vol. I). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- National Academy of Sciences. (2002). Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Office of Research Integrity. (2007). Research on research integrity. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RR-07-004.html, accessed October 25, 2011.
- Petrovečki, M., & Scheetz, M. D. (2001). Croatian Medical Journal introduces culture, control, and the study of research integrity. Croatian Medical Journal, 42(1), 7–13.Google Scholar
- Posner, R. A. (2007). The little book of plagiarism. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
- Resnik, D. B. (1998). The ethics of science: An introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Schott, G., Pachl, H., Limbach, U., Gundert-Remy, U., Lieb, K., & Ludwig, W. (2010). The financing of drug trials by pharmaceutical companies and its consequences: Part 2—A qualitative, systematic review of the literature on possible influences on authorship, access to trial data, and trial registration and publication. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 107(17), 295–301.Google Scholar
- Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53–74.Google Scholar
- Weber, E., De Vreese, L., & Van Bouwel, J. (forthcoming). How to study scientific explanation? http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/8769/1/Weber-HowTo_Study_Scientific_Explanation.pdf, accessed June 4, 2012.