Translating Neuroethics: Reflections from Muslim Ethics
- 346 Downloads
Muslim ethics is cautiously engaging developments in neuroscience. In their encounters with developments in neuroscience such as brain death and functional magnetic resonance imaging procedures, Muslim ethicists might be on the cusp of spirited debates. Science and religion perform different kinds of work and ought not to be conflated. Cultural translation is central to negotiating the complex life worlds of religious communities, Muslims included. Cultural translation involves lived encounters with modernity and its byproduct, modern science. Serious ethical debate requires more than just a mere instrumental encounter with science. A robust Muslim approach to neuroethics might require an emulsion of religion and neuroscience, thought and body, and body and soul. Yet one must anticipate that Muslim debates in neuroethics will be inflected with Muslim values, symbols and the discrete faith perspectives of this tradition with meanings that are specific to people who share this worldview and their concerns.
KeywordsNeuroethics Muslim ethics Islam Islamic law Islamic ethics Neuroscience
I would like to thank the co-editor-in-chief of this journal, Stephanie J. Bird for inviting me to contribute to this special issue and for the feedback and comments she and her guest editors Michael Kalichman and Dena Plemmons provided. All remaining errors are mine.
- Al-Azmeh, A. (1988). Islamic legal theory and the appropriation of reality. In A. al-Azmeh (Ed.), Islamic law: Social and historical contexts (pp. 251–265). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Al-Delaimy, W. K. (2012). Ethical concepts and future challenges of neuroimaging: An Islamic perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9386-3.
- Brooke, J. H. (2010). Science and secularization. In P. Harrison (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to science and religion. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Damasio, A. R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Orlando, Fla: Harcourt.Google Scholar
- French, H. W. (2011). E. O. Wilson’s theory of everything. The Atlantic, November. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/11/e-o-wilson-rsquo-s-theory-of-everything/8686/
- Gazzaniga, M. S. (2005). The ethical brain. New York: Dana Press.Google Scholar
- Ghalib, M. A. K. (1989). Divān-i Ghālib. Lahore: Ferozsons.Google Scholar
- Hamdy, S. (2012). Our bodies belong to God: Organ transplants, Islam, and the struggle for human dignity in Egypt. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Cambridge, UK: Islamic Texts Society.Google Scholar
- Moosa, E. (1999). Languages of change in Islamic law: Redefining death in modernity. Islamic Studies, 38(3), 305–342.Google Scholar
- Moosa, E. (2005). Ghazali and the poetics of imagination. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- Moosa, E. (2009). Genetically modified foods and Muslim ethics. In C. G. Brunk & H. Coward (Eds.), Acceptable genes? Religious traditions and genetically modified foods (pp. 135–157). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Moosa, E. (2002). Interface of science and jurisprudence: Dissonant gazes at the body in modern Muslim ethics. In T. Peters, M. Iqbal, & S. N. Haq (Eds.), God, life, and the cosmos: Christian and Islamic perspectives. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Moosa, E. (2012). Muslim ethics and biotechnology. In J. W. Haag, G. R. Peterson, & M. L. Spezio (Eds.), The Routledge companion to religion and science (pp. 455–465). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Moreno, J. (2002). Gaging ethics. In S. Marcus (Ed.), Neuroethics: Mapping the Field Conference Proceedings, May 13–14, 2002, San Francisco, California, (pp. 34–60). New York: Dana Press.Google Scholar
- Pinker, S. (1999). The blank slate, the noble savage, and the ghost in the machine, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, delivered at Yale University April 20 and 21, 1999. http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/documents/pinker00.pdf.
- Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
- Ramachandran, V. S. (2011). The tell-tale brain: A neuroscientist’s quest for what makes us human. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
- Sewell, W. H., Jr. (2005). The concept(s) of culture. In G. M. Spiegel (Ed.), Practicing history: New directions in historical writing after the linguistic turn (pp. 76–95). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham, London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
- Wolpe, P. R. (2009). Religious responses to neuroscientific questions. In J. Illes (Ed.), Neuroethics defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy (pp. 289–296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Yousif, A. F. (2001). ‘Islamic science’: Controversies, influence and future possibilities for scientific education in Brunei Darussalam. Religious Studies and Theology, 20(1), 81–108.Google Scholar