Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 503–507

Haunted by the Ghost in the Machine. Commentary on “The Spirituality of Human Consciousness: A Catholic Evaluation of Some Current Neuro-scientific Interpretations”

Commentary

Abstract

Metaphysical and epistemological dualism informs much contemporary discussion of the relationships of science and religion, in particular in relation to the neurosciences and the religious understanding of the human person. This dualism is a foundational artifact of modern culture; however, contemporary scientific research and historical theological scholarship encourage a more holistic view wherein human personhood is most fittingly understood as an emergent phenomenon of, but not simply reducible to, evolutionary and developmental neurobiology.

Keywords

Dualism Descartes Kant Paleoanthropology Non-reductive physicalism 

References

  1. Burpo, T. (2010). Heaven is for real: A little boy’s astounding story of his trip to heaven and back. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
  2. Clergy Letter Project. (2004). http://theclergyletterproject.org/Christian_Clergy/ChrClergyLtr.htm. Accessed 18 July 2012.
  3. Crick, F. (1994). The astonishing hypothesis. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  4. Damasio, A. (2005). Descartes’ error—emotion, reason and the human brain. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  5. Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind—constructing the conscious brain. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  6. de Waal, F. (2007). Chimpanzee politics—power and sex among apes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  8. Descartes, R. (1996). Discourse on the method and meditations on first philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping Magisteria. Natural History, 106, 16–22.Google Scholar
  10. Gould, S. J. (1999). Rocks of ages. New York, NY: Ballentine Books.Google Scholar
  11. Griffin, D. R. (2000). Religion and scientific naturalism—overcoming the conflicts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  12. Institute for Creation Research (1972). http://www.icr.org. Accessed 18 July 2012.
  13. Jonas, H. (2001). The gnostic religion. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kant, I. (1999). Critique of practical reason. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kant, I. (2001). Critique of the power of judgment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kant, I. (2008). Critique of pure reason. New York, NY: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  17. McGoldrick, T. A. (2012). The Spirituality of Human Consciousness: A Catholic Evaluation of Some Current Neuro-scientific Interpretations. Science and Engineering Ethics 18, (this issue).Google Scholar
  18. Murphy, N. (2006). Bodies and souls, or spirited bodies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. NRSV. (2001). The New Oxford Annotated Bible, new revised standard version with the Apocrypha (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Plato. (1988). Phaedo. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pope John Paul II. (1996). Truth cannot contradict truth. L’Osservatore Romano, 30 October.Google Scholar
  22. Potts, R., & Sloan, C. (2010). What does it mean to be Human. Washington, DC: National Geographic.Google Scholar
  23. Ryle, G. (2002). The concept of mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Van Huyssteen, W. (2006). Alone in the World: Human uniqueness in science and theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Presbyterian Association on ScienceTechnology and the Christian FaithSummervilleUSA

Personalised recommendations