Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 539–542 | Cite as

The Limits of the Buddhist Embrace of Science

Commentary on “Compassion, Ethics, and Neuroscience: Neuroethics through Buddhist Eyes”
  • Francisca Cho
Commentary

Abstract

The readiness of Buddhists to dialogue with and embrace modern science has caused some to worry that this encounter will deform Buddhist traditions for the sake of acceptance by the West. But their strong tradition of epistemological skepticism and intellectual pluralism makes it unlikely that Buddhists will embrace scientific positivism. Given the tensions between religion and science in contemporary western society, it is perhaps this feature of Buddhism that can make the most fruitful contribution in its dialogue with science.

Keywords

Dialogue Adaptation Epistemology Positivism Pluralism 

References

  1. Churchland, Patricia. (2002). Brain-wise: Studies in neurophilosophy. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  2. D’Aquili, Eugene. (1986). Myth, ritual, and the archetypal hypothesis. Zygon, 21(2), 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hammerstorm, E. (2010). Buddhists discuss science in modern China (18951949). PhD Dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  4. Ives, C. (2006). Not buying into words and letters: Zen, ideology, and prophetic critique. Journal of Buddhist Ethics http://blogs.dickinson.edu/buddhistethics/category/volume-13-2006/ Accessed February 13, 2012.
  5. Lama, D. (2005). The universe in a single atom. New York: Morgan Road Books.Google Scholar
  6. Lopez, Donald. (2008). Buddhism and science: A guide for the perplexed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Newberg, Andrew., & d’Aquili, Eugene. (2001). Why God won’t go away: Brain science and the biology of beliefs. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  8. Tsomo, K. L. (2012). Compassion, ethics, and neuroscience: Neuroethics through Buddhist eyes. Science and Engineering Ethics 18, this issue.Google Scholar
  9. Victoria, Daizen. (2006). Zen at war. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  10. Wallace, B. Allen. (2000). The taboo of subjectivity: Toward a new science of consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Wallace, B. Allen. (2007). Contemplative science: Where Buddhism and neuroscience converge. New York: Columbian University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Yee, A. (2009). Tibetan monks and nuns turn their minds toward science. New York Times, June 30 Section D, 3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations