Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 433–437

Neuroscience May Supersede Ethics and Law

Original Paper

Abstract

Advances in technology now make it possible to monitor the activity of the human brain in action, however crudely. As this emerging science continues to offer correlations between neural activity and mental functions, mind and brain may eventually prove to be one. If so, such a full comprehension of the electrochemical bases of mind may render current concepts of ethics, law, and even free will irrelevant.

Keywords

Functional MRI Magnetoencephalography Crime Law Free will 

References

  1. Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D., Strong, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. (2005). Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intrinsic romantic love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2000). The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport, 11, 3829–3834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., DuBeau, M., Mazziotta, J., & Lenza, G. (2005). Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: A relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. In J. T. Cacioppo & G. Bernston (Eds.), Social neuroscience (pp. 143–152). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  4. Engelman, D. (July/August 2011). The brain on trial. Atlantic Magazine.Google Scholar
  5. Frampton, M. (2008) Embodiments of Will: Anatomical and physiological theories of voluntary animal motion from Greek antiquity to the Latin middle ages, 400 B.C.-A.D. 1300. (pp.180–323). Saarbrüken: VDM Varlag.Google Scholar
  6. Gusnard, D., Akbudak, E., Shulman, G., & Raichle, M. (2001). Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 4259–4264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harper, D. (2010). Online Etmology Dictionary.Google Scholar
  8. Haynes, J., & Rees, G. (2006). Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hughes, V. (2010). Science in court. Nature, 464, 340–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lewis, J. (1990). Premenstrual syndrome as a criminal defense. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lutz, A., Brefczynski-Lewis, J., Johnstone, T., & Davidson, R.J. (2008). Regulation of neural circuitry of emotion by compassion meditation: Effects of meditative expertise. PLoS ONE, E1897.Google Scholar
  12. Miller, K., Smith, S., Jezzard, P., Wiggins, G., & Wiggins, C. J. (2007). Signal and noise characteristics of SSFP FMRI: A comparison with GRE at multiple field strengths. Neuroimage, 37, 1227–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. National Research Council. (2008). Emerging cognitive neuroscience and related technologies (p. 61). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  14. Okada, Y. (1983). Neurogenesis of evoked magnetic fields. In S. H. Williamson, G. L. Romani, L. Kaufman, & I. Modena (Eds.), Biomagnetism: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 399–408). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  15. Phan, K., Magalhaes, A., Ziemlewicz, T., Fitzgerald, D., Green, C., & Smith, W. (2005). Neural correlates of telling lies: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla. Academic Radiology, 2, 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Porter, R. (2002). Madness—a brief history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Preston, S., & de Waal, F. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 25, 1–20.Google Scholar
  18. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Stephan, K., Dolan, R., & Frith, C. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439, 466–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Roskies, A., Brown, T., & Murphy, E. (2008). Brain images as legal evidence. Episteme, 5, 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wild, J. (2005). Brain imaging ready to detect terrorists, say neuroscientists. Nature, 437, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Winston, J., Strange, B., O’Doherty, J., & Dolan, R. (2005). Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. In J. T. Cacioppo & G. Bernston (Eds.), Social neuroscience (pp. 199–210). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations