Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 1439–1450

Teaching Science, Technology, and Society to Engineering Students: A Sixteen Year Journey

Article

Abstract

The course Science, Technology, and Society is taken by about 500 engineering students each year at Bilkent University, Ankara. Aiming to complement the highly technical engineering programs, it deals with the ethical, social, cultural, political, economic, legal, environment and sustainability, health and safety, reliability dimensions of science, technology, and engineering in a multidisciplinary fashion. The teaching philosophy and experiences of the instructor are reviewed. Community research projects have been an important feature of the course. Analysis of teaching style based on a multi-dimensional model is given. Results of outcome measurements performed for ABET assessment are provided. Challenges and solutions related to teaching a large class are discussed.

Keywords

Science, technology, and society education STS education Engineering ethics education Teaching large classes ABET Accreditation Community research 

References

  1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (2011). Accessed September 2011. http://www.abet.org.
  2. Akcay, H., & Yager, R. E. (2010). The impact of a science/technology/society teaching approach on student learning in five domains. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 602–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Association for Evaluation and Accreditation of Engineering Programs (2011). Accessed September 2011. http://www.mudek.org.tr.
  4. Bird, S., & Sieber, J. E. (2005). Teaching ethics in science and engineering: Effective online education—Introduction. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (Wiley).Google Scholar
  6. Brugge, D., & Kole, A. (2003). A case study of community-based participatory research ethics: The healthy public housing initiative. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bucciarelli, L. L. (2008). Ethics and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 327–338.Google Scholar
  10. Conlon, E., & Zandvoort, H. (2011). Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: Beyond the individualistic approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Core Requirements (2011). IB Organization, Geneva. Accessed March 2011. http://www.ibo.org/recognition/resources/documents/CoreElementsBrief1.3.pdf.
  12. Cruz, J. A., & Frey, W. J. (2003). An effective strategy for integrating ethics across the curriculum in engineering: An ABET 2000 challenge. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 543–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, M. (2006). Integrating ethics into technical courses: Micro-insertion. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 717–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, M. (2007). Perils of using Hurricane Katrina to teach engineering ethics. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 26, 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Easton, T. (2008). Taking sides: Clashing views in science, technology, and society (8th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Evan, W. M., & Manion, M. (2002). Minding the machines: Preventing technological disasters. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. Jr. (1999). Where's the learning in service-learning? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (Wiley).Google Scholar
  18. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78, 674–681. Also see 2002 Preface. Accessed March 2011. http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/LS-1988.pdf.
  19. Gibbs, G., & Jenkins, A. (Eds.). (1992). Teaching large classes in higher education: How to maintain quality with reduced resources. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  20. Hansen, T. B. (2005). Grassroots science—An ISYP ideal? ISYP Journal on Science and World Affairs, 1, 61–72.Google Scholar
  21. Heppner, F. (2007). Teaching the large college class: A guidebook for instructors with multitudes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (Wiley).Google Scholar
  22. Herkert, J. R. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herkert, J. R. (2005). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hjorth, L. S., Eichler, B. A., Khan, A. S., & Morello, J. A. (2003). Technology and society: A bridge to the 21st century, (2nd ed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  25. Hughes, G. (2000). Marginalization of socioscientific material in science-technology-society science curricula: Some implications for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 426–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Humanitarian Engineering (2011). Colorado School of Mines. Accessed September 2011. http://humanitarian.mines.edu.
  27. Kaya, O., Yager, R., & Dogan, A. (2009). Changes in attitudes towards science-technology-society of pre-service science teachers. Research in Science Education, 39, 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kline, R. R. (2010). Engineering case studies: Bridging micro and macro ethics. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 29, 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. E. (2008). Learning styles of science and engineering students in problem and project based education. In Proceedings of SEFI 2008 Annual Conference. Brussels: European Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
  30. Kumar D. D., & Chubin D. E. (Eds.). (2000). Science, technology, and society: A sourcebook on research and practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. La main à la pâte. (2011). Wikipedia, French edition. Accessed March 2011. http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_main_àla_pate.
  32. Lee, M. -K., & Erdogan, I. (2007). The effect of science-technology-society teaching on students’ attitudes toward science and certain aspects of creativity. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1315–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, Y. C. (2010). Science-technology-society or technology-society-science? Insights from an ancient technology. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 1927–1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Living Knowledge (2011). The International Science Shop Network. Accessed March 2011. http://www.scienceshops.org.
  35. Loui, M. C. (2005). Educational technologies and the teaching of ethics in science and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 435–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Luegenbiehl, H. C. (2007). Disasters as object lessons in ethics: Hurricane Katrina. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 26, 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGinn, R. E. (1991). Science, technology, and society. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  38. McGinnis, J. R., & Simmons, P. (1999). Teachers’ perspectives of teaching science-technology-society in local cultures: A sociocultural analysis. Science Education, 83, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Newberry, B. (2004). The dilemma of ethics in engineering education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ozaktas, H. M. (1996). Science, technology, and society readings. Ankara: Bilkent University. Accessed March 2011. http://www.ee.bilkent.edu.tr/~ge301/scitechsoc.read.pdf.
  41. Ozaktas, H. (Oct 18–20, 2006). Integrating ethics education across the curriculum. In Second National Applied Ethics Congress, (pp. 125–127). Ankara: METU (in Turkish, invited).Google Scholar
  42. Ozaktas, H. M. (May 2008). Thoughts on science, technology, society and ethics education. Turkish Academy of Sciences Bulletin, ( pp. 3–5). (in Turkish, invited).Google Scholar
  43. Ozaktas, H. M. (2011). Science, technology, and society. Ankara: Bilkent University. Accessed March 2011. http://www.ee.bilkent.edu.tr/~ge301.
  44. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (Wiley).Google Scholar
  45. Stanley, C. A., & Porter, M. E. (Eds.). (2002). Engaging large classes: Strategies and techniques for college faculty. Boston: Anker Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. Stanton, T. K., Giles, D. E., & Cruz, N. I. (1999). Service-learning: A movements pioneers reflect on its origins, practice, and future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (Wiley).Google Scholar
  47. The Loka Institute (2011). Accessed March 2011. http://www.loka.org.
  48. The Washington Accord (2011). International Engineering Alliance. Accessed September 2011. http://www.washingtonaccord.org/Washington-Accord.
  49. van de Poel, I. R., Zandvoort, H., & Brumsen, M. (2001). Ethics and engineering courses at Delft university of technology: Contents, educational setup and experiences. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109, 121–136.Google Scholar
  51. Yager, R. E. (1990). The science/technology/society movement in the United States: Its origins, evolution, and rationale. Social Education, 54, 198–201.Google Scholar
  52. Yalvac, B., Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Kahyaoglu, E. (2007). Turkish pre-service science teachers’ views on science-technology-society issues. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zandvoort, H., Van de Poel, I., & Brumsen, M. (2000). Ethics in the engineering curricula: Topics, trends and challenges for the future. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zandvoort, H. (2008). Preparing engineers for social responsibility. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zandvoort, H., van Hasselt, G. J., & Bonnet, J. A. B. A. F. (2008). A joint venture model for teaching required courses in ‘ethics and engineering’ to engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringBilkent UniversityBilkent, AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations