Academic Integrity in a Mandatory Physics Lab: The Influence of Post-Graduate Aspirations and Grade Point Averages
Research on academic cheating by high school students and undergraduates suggests that many students will do whatever it takes, including violating ethical classroom standards, to not be left behind or to race to the top. This behavior may be exacerbated among pre-med and pre-health professional school students enrolled in laboratory classes because of the typical disconnect between these students, their instructors and the perceived legitimacy of the laboratory work. There is little research, however, that has investigated the relationship between high aspirations and academic conduct. This study fills this research gap by investigating the beliefs, perceptions and self-reported academic conduct of highly aspirational students and their peers in mandatory physics labs. The findings suggest that physics laboratory classes may face particular challenges with highly aspirational students and cheating, but the paper offers practical solutions for addressing them.
KeywordsAcademic integrity Cheating Physics labs Pre-medical students
- American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. (n.d.). Pharmacy school admissions requirements 2010–2011. http://www.aacp.org/resources/student/pharmacyforyou/admissions/Documents/PSAR1011_Table8.pdf . Accessed 5 February 2011.
- American Dental Education Association. (2007). ADEA’s official guide to dental schools 2007. http://www.dentalstudentbooks.com/dental_school_statistics.html. Accessed 5 February 2011.
- Anderson, M. S. (2011). Research misconduct and misbehavior. In T. B. Gallant (Ed.), Creating the ethical academy: A systems approach to understanding misconduct and empowering change in higher education (pp. 83–96). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Association of Schools and Colleges of Optometry. (2009). Schools and colleges of optometry: Admissions requirements 2009–2010. http://www.opted.org/files/public/Admission_Requirements_09-10.pdf. Accessed 5 February 2011.
- Berkowitz, A. D. (2004). The social norms approach: Theory, research, and annotated bibliography. http://www.alanberkowitz.com/articles/social_norms.pdf. Accessed 4 August 2011.
- Bertram Gallant, T. (2007). The complexity of integrity culture change: A case study of a liberal arts college. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 391–411.Google Scholar
- Callahan, D. (2004). The cheating culture. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Inc.Google Scholar
- Cassady, J. C. (2001). Self-reported GPA and SAT: a methodological note. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 7 (12). http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=12 . Accessed 1 August 2010.
- Chance, Z., Norton, M. I., Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2011). Temporal view of the costs and benefits of self-deception. PNAS early edition, 1–5 March 2011.Google Scholar
- Josephson Institute. (2010). The ethics of american youth: 2010. http://charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard/2010/installment02_report-card_honesty-integrity.html. Accessed 4 March 2011.
- McCabe, D. L. (2005a). Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 1(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
- McCabe, D. L. (2005b). It takes a village: Academic dishonesty. Liberal education, 91, 26–31.Google Scholar