Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 219–235 | Cite as

Academic Integrity in a Mandatory Physics Lab: The Influence of Post-Graduate Aspirations and Grade Point Averages

  • Tricia Bertram GallantEmail author
  • Michael G. Anderson
  • Christine Killoran


Research on academic cheating by high school students and undergraduates suggests that many students will do whatever it takes, including violating ethical classroom standards, to not be left behind or to race to the top. This behavior may be exacerbated among pre-med and pre-health professional school students enrolled in laboratory classes because of the typical disconnect between these students, their instructors and the perceived legitimacy of the laboratory work. There is little research, however, that has investigated the relationship between high aspirations and academic conduct. This study fills this research gap by investigating the beliefs, perceptions and self-reported academic conduct of highly aspirational students and their peers in mandatory physics labs. The findings suggest that physics laboratory classes may face particular challenges with highly aspirational students and cheating, but the paper offers practical solutions for addressing them.


Academic integrity Cheating Physics labs Pre-medical students 


  1. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. (n.d.). Pharmacy school admissions requirements 20102011. . Accessed 5 February 2011.
  2. American Dental Education Association. (2007). ADEA’s official guide to dental schools 2007. Accessed 5 February 2011.
  3. Anderson, M. S. (2011). Research misconduct and misbehavior. In T. B. Gallant (Ed.), Creating the ethical academy: A systems approach to understanding misconduct and empowering change in higher education (pp. 83–96). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Association of Schools and Colleges of Optometry. (2009). Schools and colleges of optometry: Admissions requirements 20092010. Accessed 5 February 2011.
  5. Balduf, M. (2009). Underachievement among college students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(2), 274–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkowitz, A. D. (2004). The social norms approach: Theory, research, and annotated bibliography. Accessed 4 August 2011.
  7. Bertram Gallant, T. (2007). The complexity of integrity culture change: A case study of a liberal arts college. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 391–411.Google Scholar
  8. Callahan, D. (2004). The cheating culture. Orlando, FL: Harcourt, Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Cassady, J. C. (2001). Self-reported GPA and SAT: a methodological note. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 7 (12). . Accessed 1 August 2010.
  10. Chance, Z., Norton, M. I., Gino, F., & Ariely, D. (2011). Temporal view of the costs and benefits of self-deception. PNAS early edition, 1–5 March 2011.Google Scholar
  11. Conrad, P. (1986). The myth of cut-throats among premedical students: On the role of stereotypes in justifying failure and success. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 27, 150–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, S. F., Drinan, P., & Bertram Gallant, T. (2009). Cheating in school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Del Carlo, D. I., & Bodner, G. M. (2003). Students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty in the chemistry classroom laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dobbins, G. H., Farh, J. L., & Werbel, J. D. (1993). The influence of self-monitoring and inflation of grade-point averages for research and selection purposes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: Moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hard, S. F., Conway, J. M., & Moran, A. C. (2006). Faculty and college student beliefs about the frequency of student academic misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), 1058–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harding, T. S., Carpenter, D. D., Finelli, C. J., & Passow, H. J. (2004). Does academic dishonesty relate to unethical behavior in professional practice? An exploratory study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Josephson Institute. (2010). The ethics of american youth: 2010. Accessed 4 March 2011.
  21. Kortemeyer, G. (2007). The challenge of teaching introductory physics to premedical students. Physics Teacher, 45(9), 552–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCabe, D. L. (2005a). Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 1(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  23. McCabe, D. L. (2005b). It takes a village: Academic dishonesty. Liberal education, 91, 26–31.Google Scholar
  24. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Milham, J. (1974). Two components of need for approval score and their relationship to cheating following success and failure. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 378–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murdock, T. B., Hale, N. M., & Weber, M. J. (2001). Predictors of cheating among early adolescents: Academic and social motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 76, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sims, R. L. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thompson, E. R., & Phua, F. T. T. (2005). Reliability among senior managers of the Marlowe-Crowne short-form social desirability scale. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(4), 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tricia Bertram Gallant
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael G. Anderson
    • 2
  • Christine Killoran
    • 3
  1. 1.Academic Integrity OfficeUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Physics DepartmentUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  3. 3.Undergraduate AdmissionsUniversity of San DiegoSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations