Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 1455–1468

Student-Inspired Activities for the Teaching and Learning of Engineering Ethics

Original Paper


Ethics teaching in engineering can be problematic because of student perceptions of its subjective, ambiguous and philosophical content. The use of discipline-specific case studies has helped to address such perceptions, as has practical decision making and problem solving approaches based on some ethical frameworks. However, a need exists for a wider range of creative methods in ethics education to help complement the variety of activities and learning experiences within the engineering curriculum. In this work, a novel approach is presented in which first-year undergraduate students are responsible for proposing ethics education activities of relevance to their peers and discipline area. The students are prepared for the task through a short introduction on engineering ethics, whereby generic frameworks for moral and professional conduct are discussed, and discipline and student-relevance contexts provided. The approach has been used in four departments of engineering at Imperial College London, and has led to the generation of many creative ideas for wider student engagement in ethics awareness, reflection and understanding. The paper presents information on the premise of the introductory sessions for supporting the design task, and an evaluation of the student experience of the course and task work. Examples of proposals are given to demonstrate the value of such an approach to teachers, and ultimately to the learning experiences of the students themselves.


Ethics activities Student engagement in learning design 


  1. Adams, A., & Williams, S. (2006). Customer-driven development for rapid production of assessment learning objects. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 4(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  2. Bourn, D. & Neal, I. (2008). The global engineer: Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers. Report for the DFID Development Awareness Fund project on: “Promoting Development Awareness through dialogue and partnership exploration: UK Engineering Higher Education”.Google Scholar
  3. De Graaf, E., & Ravesteijn, W. (2001). Training complete engineers: Global enterprise and engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fleischmann, S. T. (2004). Essential ethics–embedding ethics into an engineering curriculum. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Giles, A., Martin, S. C., Bryce, D., & Hendry, G. D. (2004). Students as partners in evaluation: Student and teacher perspectives. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 681–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Newberry, B. (2004). The dilemma of ethics in engineering education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Perlman, B., & Varma, R. (2001). Teaching engineering ethics. In Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Symposium. See: Accessed March 2011.
  9. Pritchard, J., & Baillie, C. (2006). How can engineering education contribute to a sustainable future. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2006, 555–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Quinn, M. J. (2006). Case-based analysis: A practical tool for teaching computer ethics. ACM SIGCSE′06, Houston Texas, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Shallcross, D. C., & Parkinson, M. J. (2006). Teaching ethics to chemical engineers: some class room scenarios. Trans IChemE, Part D, Education for Chemical Engineers, 1, 49–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations