Do we Need a Special Ethics for Research?
- 334 Downloads
Research is subject to more stringent ethical requirements than most other human activities, and a procedure that is otherwise allowed may be forbidden in research. Hence, risk-taking is more restricted in scientific research than in most non-research contexts, and privacy is better protected in scientific questionnaires than in marketing surveys. Potential arguments for this difference are scrutinized. The case in its favour appears to be weak. A stronger case can be made in favour of a difference in the opposite direction: If perilous or otherwise problematic activities have to be performed it is usually better to perform them in a research context where they are properly evaluated so that guidance is obtained for the future. However, retreating from current ethical demands on research is not a desirable direction to go. Instead, research ethics can serve to inspire the introduction of more stringent ethical principles in other social sectors.
KeywordsResearch ethics Boundary problem Applied ethics Professional ethics Clinical trials Military ethics Data mining Privacy Risk
- Beyer, F. R., & Ker, K. (2009). Street lighting for preventing road traffic injuries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab004728.html.
- Campbell, M. K., Snowdon, C., Francis, D., Elbourne, D., McDonald, A. M., Knight, R., Entwistle, V., Garcia, J., Roberts, I., & Grant, A. (2007). Recruitment to randomised trials: Strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technology Assessment, 11(48), 1–105.Google Scholar
- Elvik, R. (1999). Assessing the validity of evaluation research by means of meta-analysis. TØI report 430/1999. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics, Norwegian Centre for Transport Research.Google Scholar
- Grant, A. M., Altman, D. G., Babiker, A. B., Campbell, M. K., Clemens, F. J., Darbyshire, J. H., Elbourne, D. R., McLeer, S. K., Parmar, M. K. B., Pocock, S. J., Spiegelhalter, D. J., Sydes, M. R., Walker, A. F., & Wallace, S. A. (2005). Issues in data monitoring and interim analysis of trials. Health Technology Assessment, 9(7), 1–238.Google Scholar
- Hansson, S. O. (1998). Setting the limit. Occupational health standards and the limits of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hansson, S. O. (2009). Ethics beyond application. In T. Takala, P. Herissone-Kelly, & S. Holm (Eds.), Cutting through the surface: Philosophical approaches to bioethics (pp. 19–28). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
- Hays, C. L. (2004). What they know about you. New York Times, November 14, 2004.Google Scholar
- Highfield, R. (2008). Scientists get death threats over Large Hadron Collider. The Daily Telegraph (UK), September 5.Google Scholar
- Lag (2003:460) om etikprövning av forskning som avser människor [Act on ethical review of research involving human subjects]. Law adopted by the Swedish Parliament, promulgated June 5, 2003. http://www.riksdagen.se/webbnav/index.aspx?nid=3911&bet=2003:460.
- Mooney, C. (2005). The republican war on science. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Moreno, J. D. (2001). Undue risk. Secret state experiments on humans. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Svensson, S., & Hansson, S. O. (2007). Protecting people in research—a comparison between biomedical and traffic research. Science and Engineering Ethic, 13, 99–115.Google Scholar