Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 171–194 | Cite as

Acclimating International Graduate Students to Professional Engineering Ethics

  • Byron NewberryEmail author
  • Katherine Austin
  • William Lawson
  • Greta Gorsuch
  • Thomas Darwin
Original Paper


This article describes the education portion of an ongoing grant-sponsored education and research project designed to help graduate students in all engineering disciplines learn about the basic ethical principles, rules, and obligations associated with engineering practice in the United States. While the curriculum developed for this project is used for both domestic and international students, the educational materials were designed to be sensitive to the specific needs of international graduate students. In recent years, engineering programs in the United States have sought to develop a larger role for professional ethics education in the curriculum. Accreditation requirements, as well as pressures from the private sector, have helped facilitate this shift in focus. Almost half of all engineering graduate students in the U.S. are international students. Further, research indicates that the majority of these students will remain in the U.S. to work post-graduation. It is therefore in the interest of the profession that these students, coming from diverse backgrounds, receive some formal exposure to the professional and ethical expectations and norms of the engineering profession in the United States to help ensure that they have the knowledge and skills—non-technical as well as technical—required in today’s engineering profession. In becoming acculturated to professional norms in a host country, international students face challenges that domestic students do not encounter; such as cultural competency, language proficiency, and acculturation stress. Mitigating these challenges must be a consideration in the development of any effective education materials. The present article discusses the project rationale and describes the development of on-line instructional materials aimed at helping international engineering graduate students acclimate to professional engineering ethics standards in the United States. Finally, a brief data summary of students’ perceptions of the usefulness of the content and instructional interface is provided to demonstrate the initial effectiveness of the materials and to present a case for project sustainability.


Engineering ethics Instructional materials development International students Graduate students Online instruction 



This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under NSF Award No. 0629344, SES-Ethics and Values in Science, Engineering, and Technology.

The authors thank Brent Guinn, Monica Matzner, and Amy Pietan for their professional work in creating the online content modules, project database, web interface, and related production tasks. The authors thank the many graduate students who participated in the various studies necessary to review and refine the course content, as well as the leadership at each institution.


  1. Alberts, H. C., & Hazen, H. D. (2005). “There are always two voices”: International students’ intentions to stay in the United States or return to their home countries. International Migration, 43(3), 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York, NY: Freeman Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  4. Bashe, A., Anderson, S. K., Handelsman, M. M., & Klevansky, R. (2007). An acculturation model for ethics training: The ethics autobiography and beyond. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(1), 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, J. W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(6), 697–712.Google Scholar
  6. Bird, S. J., & Sieber, J. E. (2005). Teaching ethics in science and engineering: Effective online education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradburn, E. M., Nevill, S., & Cataldi, E. F. (2006). Where are they now? A description of 1992–93 Bachelor’s Degree recipients 10 years later (NCES 2007-159). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed 8 July 2009.
  8. Brumsen, M. (2005). Ethics in engineering in the Netherlands: The role of professional associations, universities, and law. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(3), 391–401.Google Scholar
  9. Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). (2009). Best practices in graduate education for the responsible conduct of research. Washington, DC: CGS.Google Scholar
  10. Crockett, L. J., Iturbide, M. I., Torres-Stone, R. A., McGinley, M., Raffaelli, M., & Carlo, G. (2007). Acculturative stress, social support, and coping: Relations to psychological adjustment among Mexican–American college students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(4), 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daniel, J. (1999). Computer-aided instruction on the world wide web: The third generation. Journal of Economic Education, Spring, 163–174.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, M. (2009). Is engineering a profession everywhere? Philosophia, 37, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Didier, C. (1999). Engineering ethics in France: A historical perspective. Technology in Society, 21(4), 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Didier, C. (2000). Engineering ethics at the Catholic University of Lille (France): Research and teaching in a European context. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Downey, G. L., Lucena, J. C., & Mitcham, C. (2007). Engineering ethics and identity: Emerging initiatives in comparative perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 463–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duggan, A., Hess, B., Morgan, D., Kim, S., & Wilson, K. (2001). Measuring students’ attitudes toward educational use of the Internet. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ericcson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal report as data [revised edition]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Federal Register. (2009). National Science Foundation: Responsible conduct of research. Federal Register, 74(37), 8818–8819.Google Scholar
  19. Finn, M. G. (2007). Stay rates of foreign doctorate recipients from U.S. universities 2005. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education.Google Scholar
  20. Goldston, D. B., Molock, S. D., Whitbeck, L. B., Murakami, J. L., Zayas, L. H., & Hall, G. C. N. (2008). Cultural considerations in adolescent suicide prevention and psychosocial treatment. American Psychologist, 63(1), 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gorman, M., Hertz, M., Louis, G., Magpili, L., Mauss, M., Mehalik, M., et al. (2000). Integrating ethics & engineering: A graduate option in systems engineering, ethics, and technology studies. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(4), 461–469.Google Scholar
  22. Gorsuch, G. J. (2003). The educational cultures of international teaching assistants and U.S. universities. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 7, 1–29.Google Scholar
  23. Hamilton, J. (2000). The engineering profession. Accessed 24 August 2009.
  24. Hart, H., & Moore, C. (2007). Developing curriculum in research ethics for engineers: Gathering the data. In 2007 ASEE annual conference and exposition, conference proceedings.Google Scholar
  25. Haws, D. R. (2001). Ethics instruction in engineering education: A (Mini) meta-analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(2), 223–229.Google Scholar
  26. Herkert, J. R. (2000). Engineering ethics education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herkert, J. R. (2002). Continuing and emerging issues in engineering ethics education. The Bridge, 32(3), 8–13.Google Scholar
  28. Hillman, D., Willis, D., & Gunawardena, C. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8, 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoffer, T. B., Hess, M., Welch, Jr., V., & Williams, K. (2007). Doctorate recipients from United States Universities: Summary report 2006. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  30. Hoole, S. R. H., & Hoole, D. (2005). Asian values and the human rights basis of professional ethics. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(3), 402–414.Google Scholar
  31. Hovey, J. D., Kim, S. E., & Seligman, L. D. (2006). The influences of cultural values, ethnic identity, and language use on the mental health of Korean American college students. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 140(5), 499–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hubbard, L. (2000). Technology-based math curriculums. The Journal, 28(3), 80–84.Google Scholar
  33. Huntley, H. S. (1993). Adult international students: Problems of adjustment. Report No. HE 026 329, ERIC document reproduction service No. ED 355 886.Google Scholar
  34. Iino, H. (2005). Introductory and engineering ethics education for engineering students in Japan. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(3), 378–383.Google Scholar
  35. Iseda, T. (2008). How should we foster the professional integrity of engineers in Japan? Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jiali, Y. (2005). Acculturative stress and use of the Internet among East Asian international students in the United States. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnston, S., McGregor, H., & Taylor, E. (2000). Practice-focused ethics in Australian engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kalichman, M. (2005). Use and abuse of the Internet for teaching research ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 341–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lawson, W. D. (2004). Professionalism: The golden years. American Society of Civil Engineers. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130(1), 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lucena, J., Mitcham, C., Leydens, J., Munakata-Marr, J., Straker, J., & Simoes, M. (2007). Theory and practice of humanitarian ethics in graduate engineering education. In 2007 ASEE annual conference and exposition, conference proceedings.Google Scholar
  41. Luegenbiehl, H. C. (2003a). Themes for an international code of engineering ethics. In Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE/WFEO international colloquium. Accessed 17 January 2008.
  42. Luegenbiehl, H. C. (2003b). Teaching engineering ethics across national borders. In 2003 ASEE annual conference and exposition, conference proceedings.Google Scholar
  43. Luegenbiehl, H. C. (2004). Ethical autonomy and engineering in a cross-cultural context. Techne, 8(1), 57–78.Google Scholar
  44. Lynch, W. T. (1997). Teaching engineering ethics in the United States. Technology and Society Magazine, 16(4), 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maki, R. H., Maki, W. S., Patterson, M., & Whittaker, P. D. (2000). Evaluation of a web-based introductory psychology course: Learning and satisfaction in on-line versus lecture courses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 230–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  47. National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2008). Ethics education and scientific and engineering research: What’s been learned? What should be done? Summary of a workshop at the National Academies Keck Center, August 25–26, 2008, Accessed 19 June 2009.
  48. National Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES). (2003, March). Report of the engineering licensure qualifications task force. NCEES, Clemson, SC. Accessed 8 July 2009.
  49. National Science Foundation (NSF). (1995). Restructuring engineering education: A focus on change. NSF 95-65.Google Scholar
  50. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2008a). Ethics Education in Science and Engineering (EESE). Program solicitation 08-530. Accessed 8 July 2009.
  51. National Science Foundation (NSF). (2008b). Graduate students and postdoctorates in science and engineering: Fall 2006 detailed statistical tables. NSF 08-306.Google Scholar
  52. Navarro, P., & Shoemaker, J. (1999). Economics in cyberspace: A comparison study (33 pp). University of California, Irvine: Graduate School of Management.Google Scholar
  53. Newberry, B. (2004). The dilemma of ethics in engineering education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Poyrazli, S., Kavanaugh, P. R., Baker, A., & Al-Timimi, N. (2004). Social support and demographic correlates of acculturative stress in international students. Journal of College Counseling, 7(1), 73–82.Google Scholar
  55. Rahman, O., & Rollock, D. (2004). Acculturation, competence, and mental health among South Asian students in the United States. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 32(3), 130–142.Google Scholar
  56. Riley, K., Davis, M., Jackson, A. C., & Maciukenas, J. (2009). “Ethics in the details”: Communicating engineering ethics via micro-insertion. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 52(1), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schonfeld, T. L. (2005). Reflections on teaching healthcare ethics on the web. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schrag, B. (2005). Teaching research ethics: Can web-based instruction satisfy appropriate pedagogical objectives? Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shuman, L. J., Besterfield, M., & McGourty, J. (2005). The ABET “Professional skills”—Can they be taught? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 41–45.Google Scholar
  60. Sieber, J. E. (2005). Misconceptions and realities about teaching online. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith, J. H., & Barrington, P. A. (1997). Conduct and ethics in engineering practice related to the North American free trade agreement. Final Report to the National Science Foundation, NSF Grant Number SBR-941-3323, Murdough Center for Engineering Professionalism, Texas Tech University, Accessed 23 June 2009.
  62. Spack, R. (1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language. Written Communication, 14(1), 3–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stephan, K. D. (1999). A survey of ethics-related instruction in U.S. engineering programs. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(4), 459–464.Google Scholar
  64. Sugihara, K. (2002). How to start engineering ethics education in Japan. In Proceedings of the international conference on engineering education. Google Scholar
  65. Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. L., Cooper, S., Ahern, T., Shaw, S. M., et al. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76, 93–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tomlinson-Clark, S. (2001). Education and identity within a psychological and sociocultural context. In N. K. Shimahara, I. Z. Holowinsky, & S. Tomlinson-Clark (Eds.), Ethnicity, race, and nationality in education: A global perspective. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  67. Walker, R. L. (2007). Acculturation and acculturative stress as indictors for suicide risk among African Americans. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77(3), 386–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weil, V. (1984). The rise of engineering ethics. Technology in Society, 6(4), 341–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wilton, L., & Constantine, M. G. (2003). Length of residence, cultural adjustment difficulties, and psychological distress symptoms in Asian and Latin American international college students. Journal of College Counseling, 6(2), 177–186.Google Scholar
  70. Yoon, E., & Portman, T. A. A. (2004). Critical issues of literature on counseling international students. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 32(1), 33–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Byron Newberry
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katherine Austin
    • 2
  • William Lawson
    • 3
  • Greta Gorsuch
    • 4
  • Thomas Darwin
    • 5
  1. 1.Mechanical EngineeringBaylor UniversityWacoUSA
  2. 2.Information Technology Division & Department of PsychologyTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  3. 3.Civil EngineeringTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  4. 4.Applied Linguistics and Second Language StudiesTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  5. 5.Division of Diversity & Community EngagementUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations