The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): A Discipline-Specific Approach to Assessing Moral Judgment
- 711 Downloads
To assess ethics pedagogy in science and engineering, we developed a new tool called the Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT). ESIT measures moral judgment in a manner similar to the Defining Issues Test, second edition, but is built around technical dilemmas in science and engineering. We used a quasi-experimental approach with pre- and post-tests, and we compared the results to those of a control group with no overt ethics instruction. Our findings are that several (but not all) stand-alone classes showed a significant improvement compared to the control group when the metric includes multiple stages of moral development. We also found that the written test had a higher response rate and sensitivity to pedagogy than the electronic version. We do not find significant differences on pre-test scores with respect to age, education level, gender or political leanings, but we do on whether subjects were native English speakers. We did not find significant differences on pre-test scores based on whether subjects had previous ethics instruction; this could suggest a lack of a long-term effect from the instruction.
KeywordsEngineering ethics Science ethics Assessment Moral judgment Ethics education
This research was funded in part by a grant from the College of Engineering Undergraduate Initiative at the Georgia Institute of Technology, and in part by a Focused Research Program grant from the Office of the Vice Provost for Research at the Georgia Institute of Technology. In addition, Dr. Swann was supported in part by NSF DMI-0348532. We would like to acknowledge Dr. Harry Sharp for his help with developing the scanning form for the test and converting tests to raw data and Mr. Andy Haleblian for his help in creating the electronic version of the ESIT.
- Drake, M., Griffin, P., Kirkman, R., & Swann, J. (2005). Engineering ethical curricula: assessment and comparison of two approaches. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 223–231.Google Scholar
- Harris, C. E., Davis, M., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (2005). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Harris, C. E., Davis, M., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (1996). Engineering ethics: what? why? how? and when?”. Journal of Engineering Education, 85, 93–96.Google Scholar
- Haws, D. R. (2001). Ethics instruction in engineering education: A (mini) meta-analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 90, 223–229.Google Scholar
- Herkert, J. R. (1999). ABET’s Engineering Criteria 2000 and engineering ethics: Where do we go from here? In International conference on ethics in engineering and computer science. http://www.onlineethics.org/cms/12053.aspx. Accessed 29 November 2008.
- Kohlberg, L. (1984). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages (pp. 7–169). San Fransisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Mappes, T. A., & Zembaty, J. S. (2002). Social ethics: Morality and social policy (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Narvaez, D., & Bock, T. (2002). Moral schemas and tacit judgement or how the defining issues test is supported by cognitive science. Journal of Moral Education, 31(3), 297–314.Google Scholar
- Narvaez, D., & Rest, J. (1995). The four components of acting morally. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.). Moral behavior and moral development: An introduction (pp. 385–400). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Rachels, J. (2002). The elements of moral philosophy (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Rest, J., & Narvaez, D. (Eds.). (1994). Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Rest, J., & Narvaez, D. (1998). DIT-2: Defining issues test. St. Paul, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Rest, J., Narvaes, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999a). Postconventional moral thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (1999b). New issues, new theory, new findings, Chap. 5. In Postconventional moral thinking: A Neo-Kohlbergian approach. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Schlaefli, A., Rest, J., & Thoma, S. J. (1985). Does moral education improve moral judgment? A meta-analysis of intervention studies using the defining issues test. Review of Educational Research, 55(3), 319–352.Google Scholar
- Self, D. J., & Ellison, E. M. (1998). Teaching engineering ethics: Assessment of its influence on moral reasoning skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(1), 29–34.Google Scholar