Forbidding Science: Some Beginning Reflections
- 178 Downloads
Growing powers to manipulate human bodies and minds, not merely to heal disease but to satisfy desires, control deviant behavior, and to change human nature, make urgent questions of whether and how to regulate their use, not merely to assure safety and efficacy but also to safeguard our humanity. Oversight in democratic societies rightly belongs to the polity, not merely to self-appointed experts, scientific or ethical. Yet the task of governing the uses of dangerous knowledge is daunting, and there is little evidence that we have the will or the wisdom to do it well.
KeywordsDangerous knowledge Freedom and dignity Regulating science and technology Citizen control versus expert control President’s Council on Bioethics
- Bacon, F. (1989). New Atlantis and the great instauration (revised ed.). Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson.Google Scholar
- Evans, J. H. (2002). Playing God: Human genetic engineering and the rationalization of public bioethical debate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Marchant, G. E., & Bird, S. J. (2009). Editor’s overview. Science and Engineering Ethics, this issue.Google Scholar
- Monod, J. (1972). Chance and necessity. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Moreno, J. D. (2005, Jan–Feb). The end of the great bioethics compromise, Hastings Center Report, 35(1), 14–15.Google Scholar
- National Academy of Sciences. (2002). Scientific and medical aspects of human reproductive cloning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- President’s Council on Bioethics (2004). Reproduction and responsibility: The regulation of new biotechnologies. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Also available online at www.bioethics.gov.
- Shattuck, R. (1996). Forbidden knowledge: From Prometheus to pornography. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar