Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 7–10

Underrepresentation in the Real World



  1. 1.
    Bouville, M. (2008). Is diversity good? Six possible conceptions of diversity and six possible answers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouville, M. (2008). On enrolling more female students in science and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    AAAS-NACME. (2004). Standing our ground: A guidebook for STEM educators in the post-Michigan era. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, October 2004. and
  4. 4.
    National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering. (2008). Confronting the “New American Dilemma”: Underrepresented minorities in engineering: A data-based look at diversity. White Plains, NY: NACME, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jackson, S. A. (2003). The Quiet Crisis. Building Engineering and Science Talent.
  6. 6.
    Carnevale, A. P. (2008). College for all? Change, January/February 2008. Accessed January 18, 2008.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (2000). The shape of the river: Long term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glazer, S. (2005). Gender and learning: Are there innate differences between the sexes? Congressional Quarterly, 15, 445–468.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sandler, B. R., & Hall, R. M. (1986). The campus climate revisited: Chilly for women faculty, administrators, and graduate students. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges, Project on the status of women.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frehill, L. M. (1997). Education and occupational sex segregation: The decision to major in engineering. The Sociological Quarterly, 38, 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosser, S. V. (2004). The science glass ceiling: Academic women scientists and the struggle to succeed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science, Engineering. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stewart, A. J., Malley, J. E., & LaVague-Manty, D. (Eds.). (2007). Transforming science and engineering: Advancing academic women. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bird, S. J., Didion, C. J., Niewoehner, E. S., & Fillmore, M. D. (1993). Mentoring means future scientists: A guide to developing mentoring programs based on the AWIS Mentoring Project. Washington, DC: The Association for Women in Science.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Malley, J., & Stewart, A. J. (2006). The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Diversity: Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.American Association for the Advancement of ScienceWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations