Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 169–187 | Cite as

Building a Better WarBot: Ethical Issues in the Design of Unmanned Systems for Military Applications

  • Robert SparrowEmail author
Original Paper


Unmanned systems in military applications will often play a role in determining the success or failure of combat missions and thus in determining who lives and dies in times of war. Designers of UMS must therefore consider ethical, as well as operational, requirements and limits when developing UMS. I group the ethical issues involved in UMS design under two broad headings, Building Safe Systems and Designing for the Law of Armed Conflict, and identify and discuss a number of issues under each of these headings. As well as identifying issues, I offer some analysis of their implications and how they might be addressed.


Robotics Ethics Unmanned systems War Ethics of robotics Military ethics Design ethics 


  1. Adams, T. K. (2001). Future warfare and the decline of human decision-making. Parameters: US Army War College Quarterly (Winter, 2001–2002), 57–71.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous. (2007, February 7). Defense sector accused of muscling in on robots. Professional Engineering, 20(3), 8.Google Scholar
  3. Arkin, R. C. (2007). Governing lethal behaviour: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture. Technical Report GIT-GVU-07-11 for US Army. Mobile Robot Laboratory, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology. Retrieved October 25, 2007, from
  4. Asaro, P. M. (2007). Robots and responsibility from a legal prospective. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Roma, Italy.Google Scholar
  5. Baard, E. (2003). Make robots not war: Some scientists refuse to get paid for killer ideas. Village Voice (Greenwich Village, New York, N.Y.) (September), 39–44.Google Scholar
  6. Barry, C. L., & Zimet, E. (2001). UCAVs—Technological, policy, and operational challenges. Defense Horizons (3). Retrieved November 19, 2008, from
  7. Bender, B. (2005). Attacking Iraq, from a Nev. Computer. Boston Globe, April 3, A6.Google Scholar
  8. Blackmore, T. (2005). Dead slow: Unmanned aerial vehicles loitering in battlespace. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25(3), 195–214. doi: 10.1177/0270467605276097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boland, R. (2007). Developing reasoning robots for today and tomorrow. Signal, 61(6), 43–46.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, A. (2007). Global Hawk UAV supports border Ops in Iraq. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 166(11), 56.Google Scholar
  11. Canning, J. S. (2005). A definitive work on factors impacting the arming of unmanned vehicles. Washington, DC: Dahlgren Division Naval Surface Warfare Centre.Google Scholar
  12. Canning, J. S. (2006). A concept of operations for armed autonomous systems. In 3rd Annual Disruptive Technology Conference, September 6–7, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Card, J. (2007). Killer machines. Foreign Policy (May/June), 92.Google Scholar
  14. Chapman, Col. R. E. (2002). Unmanned combat aerial vehicles: Dawn of a new age? Aerospace Power Journal, 16(2), 60–73.Google Scholar
  15. Cummings, M. L. (2004). Creating moral buffers in weapon control interface design. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 23(3), 28–33, 41. doi: 10.1109/MTAS.2004.1337888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cummings, M. L. (2006). Automation and accountability in decision support system interface design. Journal of Technology Studies, 32(1), 23–31.Google Scholar
  17. Dalton, J. G. (2006). Future navies—present issues. Naval War College Review, 59, 17–39.Google Scholar
  18. Donnelly, S. B. (2005, December 4). Long-distance warriors. Time Magazine.Google Scholar
  19. Dunlap, C. J. Jr. (1999, Autumn). Technology: Recomplicating moral life for the nation’s defenders. Parameters: US Army War College Quarterly, 24–53.Google Scholar
  20. Excell, J. (2007, January 29). Unmanned aircraft: Out of the shadows. The Engineer, 18.Google Scholar
  21. Featherstone, S. (2007). The coming robot army. Harper’s Magazine, 43–52.Google Scholar
  22. Fielding, M. (2006). Robotics in future land warfare. Australian Army Journal, 3(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  23. Fitzsimonds, J. R., & Mahnken, T. G. (2007). Military officer attitudes toward UAV adoption: Exploring institutional impediments to innovation. Joint Force Quarterly, 46, 96–103.Google Scholar
  24. Fulghum, D. A. (2003). Predator’s progress. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 158(9), 48–50.Google Scholar
  25. Foster, Lt Col. J. (2006, Spring). Ricochets and replies: First rule of modern warfare. Air and Space Power Journal. Retrieved November 19, 2008, from
  26. Graham, S. (2006). America’s robot army. New Statesman (London, England), 135(4796), 12–15.Google Scholar
  27. Gulam, H., & Lee, S. W. (2006). Uninhabited combat aerial vehicles and the law of armed conflict. Australian Army Journal, 3(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
  28. Hambling, D. (2007, January 23). Military builds robotic insects. Wired Magazine. Retrieved from
  29. Hanley, C. J. (2007, July 16). Robot-aircraft attack squadron bound for Iraq. Aviation. Retrieved November 19, 2008, from
  30. Hockmuth, C. M. (2007, February). UAVs—The next generation. Air Force Magazine, 70–74.Google Scholar
  31. Kainikara, S. (2002). UCAVs probable lynchpins of future air warfare. Asia-Pacific Defence Reporter, 28(6), 42–45.Google Scholar
  32. Kaplan, R. D. (2006, August). Hunting the Taliban in Las Vegas. Atlantic Monthly, 4.Google Scholar
  33. Kenyon, H. S. (2006). Israel deploys robot guardians. Signal, 60(7), 41–44.Google Scholar
  34. Kenyon, H. S. (2007). Airborne testbed opens new possibilities. Signal, 61(9), 47–49.Google Scholar
  35. Klein, J. J. (2003, July 22). The problematic Nexus: Where unmanned combat air vehicles and the law of armed conflict meet. Air and Space Power Journal Chronicles Online. Retrieved March 27, 2007, from
  36. Kochan, A. (2005). Automation in the sky. The Industrial Robot, 32(6), 468–471. doi: 10.1108/01439910510629181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lazarski, A. J. (2002). Legal implications of the uninhabited combat aerial vehicle. Air and Space Power Journal, 16(2), 74–83.Google Scholar
  38. Legien, W., Andersson, C.-J., & Hansen, G. (2006). UUV and USV: Which ‘unmanned’ for what task? Naval Forces, 27(3), 44–51.Google Scholar
  39. Lerner, P. (2006). Robots go to war. Popular Science, 268(1).Google Scholar
  40. McMains, J. W. (2004). The Marine Corps robotics revolution. The Marine Corps Gazette, 88(1), 34–37.Google Scholar
  41. Marino, D., & Tamburrini, G. (2006). Learning robots and human responsibility. International Review of Information Ethics, 6, 47–51.Google Scholar
  42. Marks, P. (2006). Armchair warfare. New Scientist, 192(2575), 24. doi: 10.1016/S0262-4079(06)60832-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Masey, J. P. (2006). Towards an unmanned navy: The growing world of UAV, UCAV, USV and UUV. Naval Forces, 27(6), 23–31.Google Scholar
  44. Mitcham, C. (1989). The spectrum of ethical issues associated with the military support of science and technology. In C. Mitcham & P. Siekevitz (Eds.), Ethical issues associated with scientific and technological research for the military, Vol. 577 of Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  45. Mustin, J. (2002). Future employment of unmanned aerial vehicles. Air and Space Power Journal, 16(2), 86–97.Google Scholar
  46. Office of the Secretary of Defense. (2005a). Joint Robotics Program Master Plan FY2005: Out front in harm’s way. Washington DC: Office of the Undersecretary of Defense (AT&L) Defense Systems/Land Warfare and Munitions.Google Scholar
  47. Office of the Secretary of Defense. (2005b). Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap: 2005–2030. Washington DC: Department of Defense, United States Government.Google Scholar
  48. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense. (2006). Development and utilisation of robotics and unmanned ground vehicles: Report to congress. Washington DC: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, Portfolio Systems Acquisition, Land Warfare and Munitions, Joint Ground Robotics Enterprise.Google Scholar
  49. Peterson, G. I. (2005). Unmanned vehicles: Changing the way to look at the battlespace. Naval Forces, 26(4), 29–38.Google Scholar
  50. Royal Australian Air Force. (2004). AAP 1003—Operations Law for RAAF Commanders (2nd ed.). Canberra: Air Power Development Centre.Google Scholar
  51. Scarborough, R. (2005, May 8). Special Report: Unmanned Warfare. Washington Times.Google Scholar
  52. Schmitt, M. N. (2005). Precision attack and international humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross, 87(859), 445–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shachtman, N. (2005a). Attack of the drones. Wired Magazine, 13(6). Retrieved August 25, 2005 from
  54. Shachtman, N. (2005b, May 27). Drone school, a ground’s-eye view. Wired Magazine. Retrieved September 17, 2007, from
  55. Sherman, J. (2005). The drone wars. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 61(5), 28–37. doi: 10.2968/061005011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shurtleff, D. K. (2002). The effects of technology on our Humanity. Parameters: US Army War College Quarterly (Summer), 100–112.Google Scholar
  57. Sparrow, R. (2007). Killer robots. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(1), 62–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00346.x.Google Scholar
  58. Sullivan, J. M. (2006). Evolution or revolution? The rise of UAVs. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 25(3), 43–49. doi: 10.1109/MTAS.2006.1700021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Szafranski, Col. R. (2005). The first rule of modern warfare: Never bring a knife to a gunfight. Air and Space Power Journal, 19(4), 19–26.Google Scholar
  60. Thorton, Jr., Captain, R. L. (2005). The case for robots in the SBCTs (Now). Infantry, 94(1), 33–41.Google Scholar
  61. Ulin, D. L. (2005, January 30). When robots do the killing. Los Angeles Times.Google Scholar
  62. Veruggio, G. (2006). EURON roboethics roadmap. Genoa: European Robotics Research Network.Google Scholar
  63. Veruggio, G., & Operto, F. (2006). Roboethics: Social and ethical implications of robotics. Springer Handbook of Robotics (pp. 1499–1524). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  64. Wall, R. (2006). Reality check. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 165(5), 33.Google Scholar
  65. Wise, J. (2007). No pilot, no problem. Popular Mechanics, 184(4), 64.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of ArtsMonash UniversityClaytonVICAustralia

Personalised recommendations