The Good Engineer: Giving Virtue its Due in Engineering Ethics

  • Charles E. HarrisJr.Email author
Original Paper


During the past few decades, engineering ethics has been oriented towards protecting the public from professional misconduct by engineers and from the harmful effects of technology. This “preventive ethics” project has been accomplished primarily by means of the promulgation of negative rules. However, some aspects of engineering professionalism, such as (1) sensitivity to risk (2) awareness of the social context of technology, (3) respect for nature, and (4) commitment to the public good, cannot be adequately accounted for in terms of rules, certainly not negative rules. Virtue ethics is a more appropriate vehicle for expressing these aspects of engineering professionalism. Some of the unique features of virtue ethics are the greater place it gives for discretion and judgment and also for inner motivation and commitment. Four of the many professional virtues that are important for engineers correspond to the four aspects of engineering professionalism listed above. Finally, the importance of the humanities and social sciences in promoting these virtues suggests that these disciplines are crucial in the professional education of engineers.


Professionalism Rules Technology Virtues 


  1. 1.
    Vaughan, D. (1996). The challenger launch decision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schaller, W. (1990). Are virtues no more than dispositions to obey moral rules? Philosophia, 20, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martin, M. (2000). Meaningful work. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aristotle. (1972). Nicomachean ethics (trans: Ostwald, M.). Indianapolis, IN: Library of Liberal Arts.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hursthouse, R. (2006). Virtue ethics. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab Center for the Study of Languages and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harris, C. E. Jr., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M. J. (2005). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kuhn, S. (1998). When worlds collide: engineering students encounter social aspects of production. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1, 457–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and civilization. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kulka, W. (1986). Measures and men (trans: Szreter, R.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heidigger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (trans: Lovitt, W.). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Borgmann, A. (1986). Technology and the character of everyday life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Callon, M., Law, J. (1994). Agency and the hybrid collectif. South Atlantic Quarterly, 94, 481–607.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pinch, T. J., Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacats: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feenberg, A. (2003). Democratic rationalization: Technology, power, and freedom. In R. C. Schariff & V. Dusek (Eds.), Philosophy of technology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winner, L. (1993). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science as Culture, 16, 427–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hursthouse, R. (2007). Environmental virtue ethics. In R. L. Walker & P. J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Working virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pritchard, M. S. (1992). Good works. Professional Ethics, 1, 155–177.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Florman, S. (1996). The introspective engineer. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wordsworth, W. (1933). In de Selincourt, E. (Ed.), The prelude. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentTexas A & M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations