Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 391–403

But is it Unique to Nanotechnology?

Reframing Nanoethics
Original Paper

Abstract

Attempts have been made to establish nanoethics as a new sub-discipline of applied ethics. The nature of this sub-discipline is discussed and some issues that should be subsumed under nanoethics are proposed. A distinction is made between those issue that may ensue once nanotechnology applications become available and procedural issues that should be integrated into the decision structure of the development. A second distinction relates to the central value of the ethical issue. The conditions for the ethical debate differ depending on whether the value(s) in question is internal to the technological development (i.e. health and safety) or external to it (i.e. privacy, equity etc).

Keywords

Nanotechnology Applied ethics Novelty Risk assessment Public involvement 

References

  1. 1.
    Peterson, C. (2000). Taking technology to the molecular level. Computer, 33(1), 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ratner, M. A., & Ratner, D. (2003). Nanotechnology: A gentle introduction to the next big idea. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wood, S., Jones, R., & Geldart, A. (2006). The social and economic challenges of nanotechnology. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roco, M. C. (2003). Broader societal issues of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 5, 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mnyusiwalla, A., Daar, A. S., & Singer, P. (2003). ‘Mind the gap’: Science and ethics in nanotechnology. Nanotechnology, 14, R9–R13. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/14/3/201.
  6. 6.
    Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). What counts as a ‘social and ethical issue’ in nanotechnology? Hyle, International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 11, 5–18.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weil, V. (2003). Zeroing in on ethical issues in nanotechnology. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(11), 1976–1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nordmann, A. (2007). If and then: A critique of a speculative nanoethics. Nanoethics, 1, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dupuy, J.-P., & Grinbaum, A. (2004). Living with uncertainty: Toward an ongoing normative assessment of nanotechnology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8(1), S4–S25.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grunwald, A. (2005). Nanotechnology – A new field of ethical inquiry? Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sweirstra, T., & Rip, A. (2007). Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging technologies. Nanoethics, 1, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robison, W. L. (2004). Nano-ethics. In D. Baird, A. Nordmann, & J. Schummer (Eds.), Discovering the nanoscale (pp. 285–300). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Litton, P. (2007). ‘Nanoethics’? What’s new? Hastings Center Report, 37(1), 22–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keiper, A. (2007). Nanoethics as a discipline? The New Atlantis, 16, 55–67.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Royal Society, Royal Academy of Engineering (2004). Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London: Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bainbridge, W.-S. (2006). Ethical considerations in the advance of nanotechnology. In L. Foster (Ed.), Nanotechnology science, innovation and opportunities (pp. 233–243). Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nagel, D., & Smith, S. (2006). Nanotechnology-enabled sensors: Possibilities, realities and diverse applications. In L. Foster (Ed.), Nanotechnology science, innovation and opportunities (pp. 63–176). Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lavan, D. A., Lynn, D. M., & Langer, R. (2002). Moving smaller in drug discovery and delivery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 1, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hansson, S.-O. (2004). Great uncertainty about small things. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 8(2), S26–S35.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grunwald, A. (2000). Against over-estimating the role of ethics in technology development. Science and Engineering Ethics, 6, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Juvetson, S. (2006). Nanotechnology commercialization: Transcending Moore’s law with molecular electronics and nanotechnology. In L. Foster (Ed.), Nanotechnology science, innovation and opportunities (pp. 33–56). Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Small, B. H., & Jollands, N. (2006). Technology and ecological economics: Promethean technology, Pandorian potential. Ecological Economics, 56, 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gavelin, K., Wilson, R., & Doubleday, R. (2007). Democratic technologies? Final Report of the Nanotechnology Engagement Group (NEG). Involve, London, June 2007.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Godman, M., & Hansson, S.-O. (2007). Public advice on the development of nanobiotechnology. Final Report of Four European Convergence Seminars. NanoBio-RAISE, Royal Inst. of Technology, Stockholm, November 2007.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hansson, S.-O. (2007). Hypothetical retrospection. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10(2), 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rawls, J. ([1971] 1999). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Salamanca-Buentello, F., Persad, D. L., Court, E. B., Martin, D. K., Daar, A. S., & Singer, P. A. (2005). Nanotechnology and the developing world. PLoS Med, 2(5), e97. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020097.
  28. 28.
    Colvin, V. (2003). The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nature Biotechnology, 21, 1166–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reijenders, L. (2006). Cleaner nanotechnology and hazard reduction of manufactured nanoparticles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hoet, P. H.-M., Brüske-Hohnfeld, I., & Salata, O. O. V. (2004). Nanoparticles – known and unknown health risks. Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 2, 12. doi:10.1186/1477-3155-2-12.
  31. 31.
    Hansson, S.-O., & Hermansson, H. (2007). A three-party model tool for ethical risk analysis. Risk Management, 9(3), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and History of TechnologyRoyal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Philosophy DepartmentKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations