Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 279–290

On Enrolling More Female Students in Science and Engineering

Original Paper

Abstract

Many people hold this truth to be self-evident that universities should enroll more female students in science and engineering; the main question then being how. Typical arguments include possible benefits to women, possible benefits to the economy, and the unfairness of the current female under-representation. However, when clearly stated and scrutinized these arguments in fact lead to the conclusion that there should be more women in scientific disciplines in higher education in the sense that we should expect more women (which various kinds of discrimination may prevent), not that we should actively enroll more women. Outreach programs towards high school students may therefore be logically incompatible with the arguments supposed to justify them. They should purport to allow women to graduate in a field congruent with her abilities and desires, rather than try to draw as many of them to scientific disciplines as possible: one cannot try to ‘recruit’ as many female students as possible while claiming to help them choose more freely.

Keywords

Ethics Gender equity Higher education Philosophy Policy 

References

  1. 1.
    Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., Mauney, M., Hamrin, C. E., & Dietz, E. J. (1995). A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention. III. Gender differences in student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 151–163.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wulf, W. A. (1998). Diversity in engineering. The Bridge, 28(4), 8–13.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gosink, J. (2001). Women in engineering. Retrieved from http://www.alum.mit.edu/ne/whatmatters/200104/
  4. 4.
    Sullivan, J. F., Reamon, D., & Louie, B. (2003). Girls embrace technology: A summer internship for high school girls. Frontiers in Education Conference (Boulder, CO). Retrieved from http://www.fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2003/papers/1159.pdf
  5. 5.
    Women in Scholarship, Engineering, Science, and Technology (2007). Vision statement. Retrieved from http://www.wisest.ualberta.ca/aboutus.cfm
  6. 6.
    Cuny, J., & Aspray, W. (2000). Recruitment and retention of women graduate students in computer science and engineering: Results of a workshop organized by the Computing Research Association. Retrieved from http://www.cra.org/reports/r&rwomen.pdf
  7. 7.
    Lane, N. (1999). Increasing diversity in the engineering workforce. The Bridge, 29(2), 15–19.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moskal, B. M. (2000). Looking to the future: Women in science and engineering. Frontiers in Education Conference (Kansas City, MO). Retrieved from http://www.fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2000/papers/1516.pdf
  9. 9.
    Rockland, R. H., Kimmel, H., & Bloom, J. (2002). Engineering the future enhancement of pre-engineering programs though outreach. International Conference on Engineering Education (Manchester, UK). Retrieved from http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2002/Proceedings/Papers/Index/O065-O070/O068.pdf
  10. 10.
    Hermanussen, R. & Booy, C. (2002). Equal opportunity in higher technical education: Past, present and future. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18, 452–457.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grose, T. K. (2006). Trouble on the horizon. Prism, 16, 26–31.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baum, E. (1990). Recruiting and graduating women—The underrepresented student. IEEE Communications Magazine, 28, 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zywno, M. S., Gilbride, K. A., Hiscocks, P. D., Waalen, J. K., & Kennedy, D. C. (1999). Attracting women into engineering—A case study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42, 364–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brainard, S. G. & Carlin, L. (1998). A longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87, 369–375.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chubin, D. E., May, G. S., & Babco, E. L. (2005). Diversifying the engineering workforce. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 73–86.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heller, R. S. & Martin C. D. (1994). Attracting young minority women to engineering and science: Necessary characteristics for exemplary programs. IEEE Transactions on Education, 37, 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen, J. C., Owusu-Ofori, S., Pai, D., Toca-McDowell, E., Wang, S.-L., & Waters, C. K. (1996). A study of female academic performance in mechanical engineering. Frontiers in Education Conference (Salt Lake City, UT). Retrieved from http://www.fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie96/papers/276.pdf
  18. 18.
    Widnall, S. E. (1988). AAAS presidential lecture: Voices from the pipeline. Science, 241, 1740–1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lefevre, J. (2003). The value of diversity: A justification of affirmative action. Journal of Social Philosophy, 34, 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bouville, M. (2007) Is diversity good? Six possible conceptions of diversity and six possible answers. Science and Engineering Ethics, doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9032-7
  21. 21.
    American Society for Engineering Education (1999). ASEE statement on diversity. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/about/Diversity.cfm
  22. 22.
    Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices—Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morgan, C., Isaac, J. D., & Sansone, C. (2001). The role of interest in understanding the career choices of female and male college students. Sex Roles, 44, 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Appiah, K. A. (2005). The ethics of identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sher, G. (1999). Diversity. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 28, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dewandre, N. (2002). European strategies for promoting women in science. Science, 295, 278–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gates, E. (2006). A scientific point of view. Physics Today, 59(4), 64–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cohoon, J. M. (2002). Recruiting and retaining women in undergraduate computing majors. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34, 48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Anderson, L. & Northwood, D. (2002). Recruitment and retention programs to increase diversity in engineering. International Conference on Engineering Education (Manchester, UK). Retrieved from http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2002/Proceedings/Papers/Index/O065-O070/O069.pdf
  30. 30.
    Roberts, E. S., Kassianidou, M., & Irani, L. (2002). Encouraging women in computer science. SIGCSE Bulletin, 34, 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sasser, J., Lineberry, G. T., & Scheff, S. (2004). Recruiting and retaining women in engineering: A Kentucky collaboration. Frontiers in Education Conference (Savannah, GA). Retrieved from http://www.fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2004/papers/1023.pdf
  32. 32.
    Bouville, M. (2007). Should we enrol more female students in physics? Physics World, 20(4), 18.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hedges, L. V. & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kleinfeld, J. (1998). The myth that schools shortchange girls: Social science in the service of deception. Retrieved from http://www.uaf.edu/northern/schools/myth.html
  36. 36.
    Browne, K. R. (2005). Women in science: Biological factors should not be ignored. Cardozo Women’s Law Journal, 11, 509–528.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kaufman, A. S. & McLean, J. E. (1998). An investigation into the relationship between interests and intelligence. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lips, H. M. (2004). The gender gap in possible selves: Divergence of academic self-views among high school and university students. Sex Roles, 50, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., Colburne, K. A., Sen, M. G., & Eichstedt, J. A. (2001). Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Connellan, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Batki, A., & Ahluwalia, J. (2000). Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 23, 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Alexander, G. M. & Hines, M. (2002). Sex differences in response to children’s toys in nonhuman primates (cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hoop, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jacobs, J. E. & Eccles, J. S. (1985). Gender differences in math ability: The impact of media reports on parents. Educational Researcher, 14, 20–25.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Muller, C. B. & Pavone, M. L. (1997). Retaining undergraduate women in science, math, and engineering: A model program. Frontiers in Education Conference (Pittsburgh, PA). Retrieved from http://wwwfie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie97/papers/1267.pdf
  45. 45.
    Sullivan, J. F. (2006). A call for K–16 engineering education. The Bridge, 36(2), 17–24.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Berlin, I. (1958). Two concepts of liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Materials Research and EngineeringSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Institute of High Performance ComputingSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations