Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 147–157

A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed journals in different scientific disciplines

Original Paper


Scientific journals can promote ethical publication practices through policies on conflicts of interest. However, the prevalence of conflict of interest policies and the definition of conflict of interest appear to vary across scientific disciplines. This survey of high-impact, peer-reviewed journals in 12 different scientific disciplines was conducted to assess these variations. The survey identified published conflict of interest policies in 28 of 84 journals (33%). However, when representatives of 49 of the 84 journals (58%) completed a Web-based survey about journal conflict of interest policies, 39 (80%) reported having such a policy. Frequency of policies (including those not published) varied by discipline, from 100% among general medical journals to none among physics journals. Financial interests were most frequently addressed with relation to authors; policies for reviewers most often addressed non-financial conflicts. Twenty-two of the 39 journals with policies (56%) had policies about editors’ conflicts. The highest impact journals in each category were most likely to have a published policy, and the frequency of policies fell linearly with rank; for example, policies were published by 58% of journals ranked 1 in their category, 42% of journals ranked third, and 8% of journals ranked seventh (test for trend, p = 0.003). Having a conflict of interest policy was also associated with a self-reported history of problems with conflict of interest. The prevalence of published conflict of interest policies was higher than that reported in a 1997 study, an increase that might be attributable to heightened awareness of conflict of interest issues. However, many of the journals with policies do not make them readily available and many of those policies that were available lacked clear definitions of conflict of interest or details about how disclosures would be managed during peer review and publication.


Conflicts of interest Competing interests Publication Journals Ethics 


  1. 1.
    Anonymous. (2004). Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication. Retrieved August 14, 2005, from Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bird, S. J., & Spier, R. E. (2005). The complexity of competing and conflicting interests. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(4), 515–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anonymous. Council of Science Editors. Conflicts of Interest and the Peer Review Process (Editorial Policy) Retrieved Jan. 7, 2006, from
  4. 4.
    Blumenthal, D., Causino, N., Campbell, E., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences—an industry survey. New England Journal of Medicine, 334(6), 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rennie, D. (1997). Thyroid storm. JAMA, 277(15), 1238–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stelfox, H. T., Chua, G., O’Rourke, K., & Detsky, A. S. (1998). Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(2), 101–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyd, E. A., & Bero, L. A. (2000). Assessing faculty financial relationships with industry: A case study. JAMA, 284(17), 2209–2214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bekelman, J. E., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. JAMA, 289(4), 454–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hotzel, M. J. (2002). Industry scientists look for benefits, not risks. Nature, 419(6903), 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Worthy, K., Strohman, R. C., & Billings, P. R. (2002). Conflicts around a study of Mexican crops. Nature, 417(6892), 897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krimsky, S., & Rothenberg, L. S. (2001). Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: Editorial practices and author disclosures. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krimsky, S. (2001). Journal policies on conflict of interest: If this is the therapy, what’s the disease? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 70, 115–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fava, G.A. (2004). Conflict of interest in psychopharmacology: Can Dr. Jekyll still control Mr. Hyde? Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 73, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glaser, B. E., & Bero, L. A. (2005). Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: A systematic review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(4), 553–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levinsky, N. G. (2002). Nonfinancial conflict of interest. New England Journal of Medicine, 347(10), 759–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    World Association of Medical Editors. (2006). WAME Recommendations on Publication Ethics Policies for Medical Journals:, accessed July 2, 2006.
  17. 17.
    Smith, R. (1998). Beyond conflict of interest. BMJ, 317, 291–292.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Style Manual Committee (Ed.) (2006). Scientific Style and Format: The CSE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers (7th ed.): Council of Science Editors/Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iverson, C., Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P. B., Glass, R. M., Glitman, P., & Lantz, J. C., et al. (Eds.), (1998). American Medical Association Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saha, S., Saint, S., & Christakis, D. A. (2003). Impact factor: A valid measure of journal quality? Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91(1), 42–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical InformaticsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.JAMAChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations