Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 717–730 | Cite as

Integrating ethics into technical courses: Micro-insertion

  • Michael DavisEmail author


Perhaps the most common reason science and engineering faculty give for not including “ethics” (that is, research ethics, engineering ethics, or some discussion of professional responsibility) in their technical classes is that “there is no room”. This article 1) describes a technique (“micro-insertion”) that introduces ethics (and related topics) into technical courses in small enough units not to push out technical material, 2) explains where this technique might fit into the larger undertaking of integrating ethics into the technical (scientific or engineering) curriculum, and 3) concludes with some quantified evidence (collected over more than a decade) suggesting success. Integrating ethics into science and engineering courses is largely a matter of providing context for what is already being taught, context that also makes the material already being taught seem “more relevant”.


ethics curriculum technical pervasive profession 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Davis, Michael. (1993) “Ethics Across the Curriculum: Teaching Professional Responsibility in Technical Courses”, Teaching Philosophy 16 (September): 205–235.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Acharya, Muchund, Davis, Michael, and Weil, Vivian. (1995) “Integrating Ethics into an Undergraduate Research Experience”, Journal of Engineering Education 84 (April): 129–132.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davis, Michael. (1997) “Developing and Using Cases to Teach Practical Ethics”, Teaching Philosophy 20 (December): 353–385.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, Michael. (2004) “Five Kinds of Ethics Across the Curriculum: An Introduction to Four Experiments with One Kind”, Teaching Ethics 4 (Spring): 1–14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis, Michael. (2002) Profession, Code, and Ethics. Ashgate, Aldershot, England.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, Michael. (1997) “Is There a Profession of Engineering?” Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (October): 407–428.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, Michael. (1998) Thinking like an Engineer: Essays in the Ethics of a Profession. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rest, James. (1985) “The Major Components of Morality” in Morality in Moral Development, and Moral Behavior, Kurtines, W. and Gewirtz, J. eds. Wiley, New York, pp, 24–38.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bebeau, Muriel. (1993) “Designing an Outcome-Based Ethics Curriculum on Moral Reasoning: Strategies and Evidence of Effectiveness”, Journal of Moral Education 22 (1993): 313–326.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bebeau, M., Rest, J., Narvaez, D. (1999) Beyond the Promise: A Perspective for Research in Moral Education, Educational Researcher 28, 4: 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Whitbeck, Caroline. (1995) “Teaching Ethics to Scientists and Engineers: Moral Agents and Moral Problems”, Science and Engineering Ethics. 1:3: 299–308.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Institute of Medicine, National Research Council of National Academies. (2002) Integrity in Scientific Research, National Academies Press: Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ethics Bowl, Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moran, Michael J. and Shapiro, Howard N. (1992) Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, 2nd edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Problem 10.21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Study of Ethics in the ProfessionsIllinois Institute of Technology, 205 HUBChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations