Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 543–554 | Cite as

Duplicate publication and ‘paper inflation’ in the fractals literature

  • Ronald N. Kostoff
  • Dustin Johnson
  • J. Antonio Del Rio
  • Louis A. Bloomfield
  • Michael F. Shlesinger
  • Guido Malpohl
  • Hector D. Cortes
Article

Abstract

The similarity of documents in a large database of published Fractals articles was examined for redundancy. Three different text matching techniques were used on published Abstracts to identify redundancy candidates, and predictions were verified by reading full text versions of the redundancy candidate articles. A small fraction of the total articles in the database was judged to be redundant. This was viewed as a lower limit, because it excluded cases where the concepts remained the same, but the text was altered substantially.

Far more pervasive than redundant publications were publications that did not violate the letter of redundancy but rather violated the spirit of redundancy. There appeared to be widespread publication maximization strategies. Studies that resulted in one comprehensive paper decades ago now result in multiple papers that focus on one major problem, but are differentiated by parameter ranges, or other stratifying variables. This ‘paper inflation’ is due in large part to the increasing use of metrics (publications, patents, citations, etc) to evaluate research performance, and the researchers’ motivation to maximize the metrics.

Keywords

Text Mining Redundant Publications Text Matching Paper Inflation Document Plagiarism Concept Matching Fractals Greedy String Tiling CopyFind Data Compression 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Braumoeller BF, Gaines BJ. (Dec 2001) Actions Do Speak Louder Than Words: Deterring Plagiarism with the Use of Plagiarism-Detection Software. PS-Political Science & Politics 34 (4): 835–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Monostori K, Finkel R, Zaslavsky A, Hodasz G, Pataki M. (2002) Comparison of Overlap Detection Techniques. Computational Science-ICCS 2002, Pt I, Proceedings Lecture Notes In Computer Science 2329: 51–60.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cook DE, Mellor L, Frost G, Creutzburg R. (2002) Knowledge Management and the Control of Duplication. Engineering and Deployment of Cooperative Information Systems, Proceedings Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2480: 396–402.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoad TC, Zobel J. (Feb 1 2003) Methods for Identifying Versioned and Plagiarized Documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 (3): 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilbert FJ, Denison AR. (Jul 2003) Research Misconduct. Clinical Radiology 58 (7): 499–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pecorari D. (Dec 2003) Good and Original: Plagiarism and Patchwriting in Academic Second-Language Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12 (4): 317–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen X, Francia B, Li M, Mckinnon B, Seker A. (Jul 2004) Shared Information and Program Plagiarism Detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 50 (7): 1545–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bao JP, Shen JY, Liu XD, Liu HY, Zhang XD. (2004) Finding Plagiarism Based on Common Semantic Sequence Model. Advances in Web-Age Information Management: Proceedings Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3129: 640–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doherty M. (Nov 1996) Misconduct of Redundant Publication. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 55 (11): 783–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jefferson T. (Apr 1998) Redundant Publication in Biomedical Sciences: Scientific Misconduct or Necessity? Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2): 135–140.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schein M, Paladugu R. (Jun 2001) Redundant Surgical Publications: Tip of the Iceberg? Surgery 129 (6): 655–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bailey BJ. (Mar 2002) Duplicate Publication in the Field of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 126 (3): 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Von Elm E, Poglia G, Walder B, Tramer MR. (Feb 25 2004) Different Patterns of Duplicate Publication — An Analysis of Articles Used in Systematic Reviews. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association 291 (8): 974–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mojon-Azzi SM, Jiang XY, Wagner U, Mojon DS. (May 2004) Redundant Publications in Scientific Ophthalmologic Journals — the Tip of the Iceberg?. Ophthalmology 111 (5): 863–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gwilym SE, Swan MC, Giele H. (Jul 2004) One in 13 ‘Original’ Articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are Duplicate or Fragmented Publications. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-British Volume 86b (5): 743–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maderlechner G, Suda P, Bruckner T. (Nov 1997) Classification of Documents by Form and Content. Pattern Recognition Letters 18 (11–13): 1225–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Atlam ES, Fuketa M, Morita K, Aoe J. (Nov 2003) Documents Similarity Measurment Using Field Association Terms. Information Processing & Management 39 (6): 809–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dobrynin V, Patterson D, Rooney N. (2004) Contextual Document Clustering. Advances in Information Retrieval, Proceedings Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2997: 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shin K, Han SY, Gelbukh A. (2004) Advanced Clustering Technique for Medical Data Using Semantic Information. Micai 2004: Advances in Artificial Intelligence Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2972: 322–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li WY, Ng WK, Lim EP. (2004) Spectral Analysis of Text Collection for Similarity-Based Clustering. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Proceedings Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3056: 389–393.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bansal N, Blum A, Chawla S. (Jul–Sep 2004) Correlation Clustering. Machine Learning 56 (1–3): 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salton G, Buckley C (Aug 30 1991) Text Matching for Information-Retrieval. Science 253 (5023): 1012–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hui SC, Fong ACM. (2004) Document Retrieval from a Citation Database Using Conceptual Clustering and Co-Word Analysis. Online Information Review 28 (1): 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leuski A, Allan J. (Jun 2004) Interactive Information Retrieval Using Clustering and Spatial Proximity. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 14 (2–3): 259–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muresan G, Harper DJ. (Aug 2004) Topic Modeling for Mediated Access to Very Large Document Collections. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55 (10): 892–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chang Y, Kim M, Ounis I. (2004) Construction of Query Concepts in a Document Space Based on Data Mining Technques. Flexible Query Answering Systems, Proceedings Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3055: 137–149.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kostoff, RN, Shlesinger M, and Malpohl G. (March 2004) Fractals roadmaps using bibliometrics and database tomography. Fractals. 12:1. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kostoff RN, Eberhart HJ, and Toothman DR. (1997) Database Tomography for information retrieval. Journal of Information Science 23: 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kostoff RN. (May 2000) The underpublishing of science and technology results. The Scientist. 14:9. 6–6. 1.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kostoff RN, Johnson D, Del Rio JA, Bloomfield LA, Shlesinger MF, and Malpohl G. (2005) Duplicate publication and ‘paper inflation’ in the fractals literature. DTIC Technical Report Number ADA440622 (http://www.dtic.mil/). Defense Technical Information Center. Fort Belvoir, VA.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Benedetto D, Caglioti E, Loreto V. (Jan 28 2002) Language trees and zipping. Physical Review Letters 88 (4) 048702: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald N. Kostoff
    • 4
  • Dustin Johnson
    • 4
  • J. Antonio Del Rio
    • 1
  • Louis A. Bloomfield
    • 2
  • Michael F. Shlesinger
    • 4
  • Guido Malpohl
    • 3
  • Hector D. Cortes
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro de Investigación en Energía UNAMTemixco, MorMéxico
  2. 2.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  3. 3.University of KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany
  4. 4.Office of Naval ResearchArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations