Surgical patents and patients — The ethical dilemmas
- 63 Downloads
Abstract
It is obvious that every inventor should be rewarded for the intellectual effort, and at the same time be encouraged to successively improve his or her discovery and to work on subsequent innovations. Patents also ensure that patent owners are officially protected against intellectual piracy, but protection of intellectual property may be difficult to accomplish. Nevertheless, it all comes down to this basic question: Does a contradiction exist between medical ethics and the “Medical and Surgical Procedure Patents” system? It may well turn out that medical-procedure patents can have a negative influence on the standard of medical care. Medical-method patents may also interfere with the physician-patient relationship. At present, physicians do not question the usefulness of patent protection for medicines, biotechnology, equipment and devices, but they strongly oppose it for surgical procedures.
Keywords
patents medical procedure patents medical process patentsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Twardowska - Pozorska, A., Twardowski, T. (2000) Biotechnologia: trudne patenty. Rzecznik Patentowy 3:13–20.Google Scholar
- 2.Rovner, J. (1996) Congress moves to restrict medical-procedure patents. Lancet 348: 1025.Google Scholar
- 3.American Medical Association. (1998) Ethical issues in the patenting of medical procedures. Code Med Ethics Rep. 67: 59–70.Google Scholar
- 4.Packer, S. (1999) Ethics and Medical Patents. Archives of Ophthalmology 117(6): 824–826.Google Scholar
- 5.McNamee, D. (1995) UK report on intellectual property. Lancet 345(8953): 847–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Melzer, D. (1998) Patent protection for medical technologies: why some and not others? Lancet 351(9101): 518–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Jones, J.W., McCullough, L.B., Richman, B.W. (2003) Ethics of Patenting Surgical Procedures. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 37(1): 235–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E.G., Anderson, M.S., Causino, N., Louis, K.S. (1997) Withholding research results in academic life science: evidence from a national survey of faculty. JAMA 277: 1224–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Packer, S. (1999) Ethics and Medical Patents. Archives of Ophthalmology. 117(6):824–826.Google Scholar
- 10.Stavos M. (1996) Biotechnology and the utilitarian argument for patients. Soc Philosophy Policy 13: 113–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Mayor, S. (2000). First UK patents for cloning issued to creators of Dolly the sheep. BMJ. 320(7230): 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Moore F.D. (1999) John Collins Warren and His Act of Conscience: A Brief Narrative of the Trial and Triumph of a Great Surgeon [Retrospections in Surgery] Annals of Surgery. 229(2): 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Prawo Własności Przemysłowej za zmianami wchodz\(\dot z\)cymi w życie 1.01.2004. Urzad Patentowy RP. Kantor Wydawniczy Zakamycze.2003.Google Scholar