Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 235–256

Understanding moral responsibility in the design of trailers

Article

Abstract

This paper starts from the presupposition that moral codes often do not suffice to make agents understand their moral responsibility. We will illustrate this statement with a concrete example of engineers who design a truck’s trailer and who do not think traffic safety is part of their responsibility. This opinion clashes with a common supposition that designers in fact should do all that is in their power to ensure safety in traffic. In our opinion this shows the need for a moral philosophy that helps engineers to interpret their responsibility and think more critically about it. For this purpose we will explore the moral philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre, which is particularly interesting because he locates the beginning of moral thinking in the daily practice of a profession. This is consistent with the history of moral codes, for codes are also the product of moral reflection by professionals. We will use MacIntyre’s philosophy to (1) explain what is wrong with the designers’ understanding of their responsibility and (2) show a possible way to bring their reflection to a more self-critical level. We will also inspect MacIntyre’s proposal critically.

Keywords

engineering design safety practices MacIntyre moral responsibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    www.krone.de.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Central Bureau of Statistics and SWOV, www.swov.nl.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    see www.dodehoek.nl and European Directive 2003/97/EG accessible http://europa.eu.int/eurlex/en/index.html.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, M. (1998) Thinking Like an Engineer: Studies in the Ethics of a Profession, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Didier, C. (2000) Engineering ethics at the Catholic university of Lille (France): research and teaching in a European context. European Journal of Engineering Education 25(4): 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    See http://www.bouwenmetstaal.nl/.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacIntyre, A.C. (1981), After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. van Gorp, Ethical issues in engineering design. This thesis will appear July 2005. The trailer case described in this article is one of four cases from this thesis.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    See www.cur.nl.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    www.ieee.org.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    www.abet.org.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    www.onlineethics.org.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    www.lockheedmartin.com, www.bp.com, www.whirlpool.com, www.dow.com.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frazer, E. and Lacey, N. (1994) MacIntyre, Feminism and the concept of practice. in: Horton, J. and Mendus S. eds. After MacIntyre; Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Polity Press, Cambridge and Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taylor, Ch. (1994) Justice after virtue in: Horton, J. and Mendus S. eds. After MacIntyre; Critical Perspectives on the Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Polity Press, Cambridge and Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    MacIntyre, A.C. (1994) in: Horton, J. and Mendus S. eds. After MacIntyre; critical perspectives on the work of Alasdair. Polity Press, Cambridge Oxford p.286–290Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williams, B. (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    MacIntyre, A.C. (1990) Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopedia, Geneology and Tradition. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    MacIntyre, A.C. (1999) Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Subdepartment History, Philosophy and Technology Studies, Department of Technology ManagementEindhoven University of Technology, IPO 2.35Eindhoventhe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations