Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 187–201 | Cite as

Nanotechnology — A new field of ethical inquiry?

Article

Abstract

Parallel to the public discussion on the benefits and risks of nanotechnology, a debate on the ethics of nanotechnology has begun. It has been postulated that a new “nano-ethics” is necessary. In this debate, the — positive as well as negative — visionary and speculative innovations which are brought into connection with nanotechnology stand in the foreground. In this contribution, an attempt is made to discover new ethical aspects of nanotechnology in a more systematic manner than has been the case. It turns out that there are hardly any completely new ethical aspects raised by nanotechnology. It is much rather primarily a case of gradual shifts of emphasis and of relevance in questions which, in principle, are already known and which give reason for ethical discussions on nanotechnology. In a certain manner, structurally novel ethical aspects arise through the important role played by visions in the public discourse. New questions are also posed by the fact that previously separate lines of ethical reflection converge in the field of nanotechnology. The proposal of an independent “nano-ethics”, however, seems exaggerated.

Keywords

Keywords ethics of technology nanotechnology risks equity privacy enhancement of human beings 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Paschen, H., Coenen, C., Fleischer, T., Grünwald, R., Oertel, D., Revermann, C. (2004) Nanotechnologi,. Springer, Berlin et al.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roco, M.C., Bainbridge, W.S. (2002) eds. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance. National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moor, J., Weckert, J. (2003) Nanoethics: Assessing the Nanoscale from an ethical point of view. Lecture, Technical University of Darmstadt, October 10, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robison, W.L. (2004) Nano-Ethics. Rochester Institute of Technology (manuscript).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mnyusiwalla, A. et al. (2003) Mind the Gap. Science and Ethics in Nanotechnology. Nanotechnology 14: R9-R13; www.iop.org/EJ.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poel, I. van de (2001) Investigating Ethical Issues in Engineering Design. Science and Engineering Ethics 7: 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grunwald, A. (2000) Against Over-Estimating the Role of Ethics in Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 6: 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grunwald, A. (2003) Methodical Reconstruction of Ethical Advises. In: G. Bechmann, I. Hronszky (eds.): Expertise and Its Interfaces. Edition Sigma, Berlin: 103–124.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weckert, J. (2002) Lilliputian Computer Ethics. Metaphilosophy 33: 366–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hermerén, G. (2004) Nano Ethics Primer. Conference “Mapping out nano risks”. Brussels March 1, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baumgartner, C. (2004) Ethische Aspekte nanotechnologischer Forschung und Entwicklung in der Medizin. Das Parlament B23–24: 39–46.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jonas, H. (1979) Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ETC-Group (2003) The Big Down. Atomtech: Technologies Converging at the Nanoscale. www.etcgroup.org.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harremoes, P., Gee, D., MacGarvin, M., Stirling, A., Keys, J., Wynne, B., Guedes Vaz, S. (2002) eds.: The Precautionary Principle in the 20 th century. Late Lessons from early warnings. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schomberg, R.v. (2004): The Normative Dimensions of the Precautionary Principle and its Relations to Science and Risk Management Decisions. In: Achen, T. (ed.): Microscopic Modification and Big Politics. Linkopeing Studies in Arts and Sciences, Vadstena (in press).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gethmann, C.F.; Mittelstraß, J. (1992): Umweltstandards. GAIA 1: 16–25.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kopfmueller, J., Brandl, V., Jörissen, J., Paetau, M., Banse, G., Coenen, R., Grunwald, A., (2001) Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet. Edition Sigma, Berlin.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fleischer, T. (2003) Technikgestaltung für mehr Nachhaltigkeit: Nanotechnologie. In: Coenen, R., Grunwald, A. (eds.): Nachhaltigkeitsprobleme in Deutschland. Analyse und Lösungsstrategien. Edition Sigma, Berlin: 356–373.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fleischer, T., Grunwald, A. (2002) Technikgestaltung für mehr Nachhaltigkeit — Anforderungen an die Technikfolgenabschätzung. In: Grunwald, A. (2002, ed.): Technikgestaltung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung. Edition Sigma, Von der Konzeption zur Umsetzung. Berlin: 95–146.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nanoforum (2004) ed. Nanotechnology. Benefits, Risks, Ethical, legal, and social Aspects of NANOTECHNOLOGY, www.nanoforum.org.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Altmann, J., Gubrud, A.A. (2002) Risks from military uses of nanotechnology — the need for Technology Assessment and Preventive Control. In: Rocco, M., Tomellini, R. (eds.): Nanotechnology — Revolutionary Opportunities and Societal Implications, European Commission, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Habermas, J. (2001) Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    MacDonald, C. (2004) Nanotech is Novel; the Ethical Issues Are Not. The Scientist 18: 3.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grunwald, A. (2004) Vision Assessment as a new element of the Technology Futures Analyses toolbox. EU-US Seminar: New Technology Foresight, Forecasting & Assessment Methods-Seville 13–14 May 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Opragen Publications 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS)Research Centre KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations